One-Eval: An Agentic System for Automated and Traceable LLM Evaluation
Organizations: Peking University · Beijing Institute of Technology · Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications · Zhongguancun Academy
Abstract
Reliable evaluation is essential for developing and deploying large language models, yet in practice it often requires substantial manual effort: practitioners must identify appropriate benchmarks, reproduce heterogeneous evaluation codebases, configure dataset schema mappings, and interpret aggregated metrics. To address these challenges, we present One-Eval, an agentic evaluation system that converts natural-language evaluation requests into executable, traceable, and customizable evaluation workflows. One-Eval integrates (i) NL2Bench for intent structuring and personalized benchmark planning, (ii) BenchResolve for benchmark resolution, automatic dataset acquisition, and schema normalization to ensure executability, and (iii) Metrics & Reporting for task-aware metric selection and decision-oriented reporting beyond scalar scores. The system further incorporates human-in-the-loop checkpoints for review, editing, and rollback, while preserving sample evidence trails for debugging and auditability. Experiments show that One-Eval can execute end-to-end evaluations from diverse natural-language requests with minimal user effort, supporting more efficient and reproducible evaluation in industrial settings. Our framework is publicly available at https://github.com/OpenDCAI/One-Eval.
Figures & tables
| Metric | Count | Rate |
|---|---|---|
| Plan Executable Rate | 99/100 | 99% |
| Auto-Complete Rate | 85/100 | 85% |
| Full Plan Rate | 84/100 | 84% |
| Avg. Tokens | 10,652 | |
| Framework | Custom | Automate | Rec. Bench | Rec. Metric |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| One-Eval (ours) | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ | ✓ |
| lm-eval-harness | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| OpenCompass | ✓ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
| HELM | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ | ✗ |
Appendix figures & tables9 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
| Category | Featured Metric | Diagnostic Utility & Mechanism |
| Math Reasoning | math_verify | Hybrid Equivalence : Combines strict text matching with mathematical equivalence checks to reduce false negatives in varying output formats. |
| symbolic_match | Algebraic Validation : Uses symbolic simplification libraries to verify correctness regardless of variable ordering or simplification state. | |
| Code Generation | soft_code_execution | Static Analysis : Performs syntax parsing and complexity checks (e.g., cyclomatic complexity) without requiring a sandboxed runtime. |
| code_similarity | Reference Proxy : Computes BLEU-based similarity against ground truth when executable test cases are unavailable. | |
| Behavioral | format_compliance | Instruction Adherence : Quantifies the rate of successful structural parsing (e.g., JSON/Markdown), critical for downstream system integration. |
| extraction_rate | Answer Stability : Measures the model’s ability to isolate the final answer from its own reasoning chain (Chain-of-Thought). |
Automated Evaluation
Automated evaluation develops metrics, benchmarks, and AI judges to assess model outputs and system behavior at scale.
See all 396 papers