Flexible Cutoff Learning: Optimizing Machine Learning Potentials After Training
Organizations: Institute for Numerical Simulation, University of Bonn · Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing SCAI · Institute for Numerical Simulation, University of Bonn, Friedrich-Hirzebruch-Allee 7, 53115 Bonn, Germany · Fraunhofer Institute for Algorithms and Scientific Computing SCAI, Schloss Birlinghoven 1, 53757 Sankt Augustin, Germany
Abstract
We introduce Flexible Cutoff Learning (FCL), a method for training machine learning interatomic potentials (MLIPs) whose cutoff radii can be adjusted after training. Unlike conventional MLIPs that fix the cutoff radius during training, FCL models are trained by randomly sampling cutoff radii independently for each atom. The resulting model can then be deployed with different per-atom cutoff radii depending on the application, enabling application-specific optimization of the accuracy-cost tradeoff. Using a differentiable cost model, these per-atom cutoffs can be optimized for specific target systems after training. We demonstrate FCL with a modified MACE architecture trained on the MAD dataset. For a subset featuring molecular crystals, optimized per-atom cutoffs reduce computational cost by more than 60% while increasing force errors by less than 1%. These results show that FCL enables training of a single general-purpose MLIP that can be adapted to diverse applications through post-training cutoff optimization, eliminating the need for retraining.
Figures & tables
| Model | / | Reference | |
| MACE-MP-0 | 6.0 | 2 | [ 8 ] |
| MACE-OFF23-S | 4.5 | 2 | [ 9 ] |
| MACE-OFF23-M/L | 5.0 | 2 | [ 9 ] |
| MACE-OFF24-M | 6.0 | 2 | [ 9 ] |
| SevenNet-Omni | 6.0 | 2 | [ 14 ] |
| UMA | 6.0 | 2 | [ 10 ] |
Appendix figures & tables6 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
| Parameter | Value |
|---|---|
| Cutoff radius ( ) | variable |
| Bessel functions | 10 |
| Polynomial cutoff order | 5 |
| Correlation order | 1 |
| Maximum angular momentum ( ) | 1 |
| Interaction layers | 2 |
| r_max | avg_num_neighbors |
|---|---|
| 4.0 | 19.3 |
| 5.0 | 38.2 |
| 6.0 | 65.4 |
| 7.0 | 104.1 |
| Element | Fraction |
|---|---|
| H | |
| C | |
| N | |
| O | |
| F | |
| Na |
Machine Learning Interatomic Potentials
Machine learning interatomic potentials predict atomic energies and forces for fast simulations of molecules and materials.
See all 91 papers