Speaker Verification with Speech-Aware LLMs: Evaluation and Augmentation
Authors: Thomas Thebaud, Yuzhe Wang, Laureano Moro-Velazquez, Jesus Villalba-Lopez, Najim Dehak
Organizations: Electrical and Computer Engineering Department, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA · Human Language Technology Center of Excellence, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USA
Speech-aware large language models (LLMs) can accept speech inputs, yet their training objectives largely emphasize linguistic content or specific fields such as emotions or the speaker's gender, leaving it unclear whether they encode speaker identity. First, we propose a model-agnostic scoring protocol that produces continuous verification scores for both API-only and open-weight models, using confidence scores or log-likelihood ratios from the Yes/No token probabilities. Using this protocol, we benchmark recent speech-aware LLMs and observe weak speaker discrimination (EERs above 20% on VoxCeleb1). Second, we introduce a lightweight augmentation that equips an LLM with ASV capability by injecting frozen ECAPA-TDNN speaker embeddings through a learned projection and training only LoRA adapters. On TinyLLaMA-1.1B, the resulting ECAPA-LLM achieves 1.03% EER on VoxCeleb1-E, approaching a dedicated speaker verification system while preserving a natural-language interface.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Schematic of the pipeline to train and test a speaker-aware LLM.
Model
EER %↓
Failure
Gender
Gender
Accent
Accent
Vox1-O
Vox1-E
Vox1-H
Rate %↓
Accuracy %↑
Predicted %↑
Accuracy %↑
Predicted %↑
Qwen-2.5-7B [ 6 ]
37.01
34.83
45.43
0.68
97.98
99.82
75.45
76.76
Kimi-audio-7B [ 35 ]
43.58
43.02
43.93
16.12
-
0
-
0
Gemini3-flash [ 26 ]
45.13
45.64
44.26
0.38
92.16
99.75
84.99
85.72
Gemini2.5-flash-lite [ 26 ]
36.15
37.09
47.55
16.56
91.40
99.91
83.32
83.90
GPT4.0-audio [ 3 ]
22.62
21.88
38.91
0.05
97.32
99.42
82.65
82.90
Table 1: Speaker-awareness evaluation of a set of Speech-aware LLMs using confidence scoring. EER (%) is shown for each split of Voxceleb1-test, as well as the confidence score failure rate, accuracy and failure rate for gender and accent prediction. Accuracies are left empty for Kimi as those fields were never predicted. Note that in case of failure to provide a score for a trial, the trial is ignored in the computation of the EER.
Model
Vox1-O
Vox1-E
Vox1-H
ECAPA-TDNN [ 13 ]
0.89
0.45
0.96
SA-Ministral3
14.76
15.88
21.04
SA-TinyLLaMA
1.87
1.03
2.20
SA-TinyLLaMA F
5.48
4.21
6.60
SA-TinyLLaMA XS
3.57
2.21
3.44
SA-TinyLLaMA XSF
27.01
27.82
28.55
Table 2: EER (%) results on the splits of VoxCeleb1 for our proposed speaker-augmented LLMs, evaluated using log-likelihood based scoring. The ECAPA-TDNN system is shown as a comparison, evaluated using cosine scoring.
As audio-first agents become increasingly common in physical AI, conversational robots, and screenless wearables, audio large language models (audio-LLMs) must integrate speaker-specific understanding to support user authorization, personalization, and context-aware interaction. This requires modeling who is speaking, how the voice sounds, and how recording conditions affect speaker cues. Conventional speaker verification systems provide strong scalar scores but little linguistic evidence, while current audio-LLMs and speaker-aware language models have limited ability to organize speaker information beyond binary labels or descriptive profiles. We present SpeakerLLM, a speaker-specialized audio-LLM framework that unifies single-utterance speaker profiling, recording-condition understanding, utterance-pair speaker comparison, and evidence-organized verification reasoning within a natural-language interface. We construct verification-reasoning targets and a decision-composition policy that separate profile-level evidence from the final same-or-different decision and organize recording condition, profile evidence, and the decision into a structured trace. At its core, SpeakerLLM uses a hierarchical speaker tokenizer designed to capture multiple granularities of speaker evidence. Utterance-level speaker embeddings summarize identity and profile-level cues, whereas frame-level speaker features preserve fine-grained acoustic descriptors. Experiments show that SpeakerLLM-Base improves speaker-profile and recording-condition understanding over general audio-LLMs, while SpeakerLLM-VR preserves strong generated-verdict accuracy and produces decision traces grounded in the supervised verification reasoning schema. We will release the metadata-enriched supervision dataset and target-construction code for reproducibility.
KiHyun Nam, Jungwoo Heo, Siu Bae +2
Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) · University of Seoul
Recent advances in text-to-speech and voice cloning make high-quality spoofing inexpensive and scalable, threatening voice authentication systems, especially automatic speaker verification (ASV). Existing defenses mainly address this threat through binary countermeasures (CMs) for deepfake detection or spoofing-aware speaker verification (SASV), where current systems are dominated by modular ASV-CM fusion and cascaded pipelines. Although large audio language models (LALMs) have shown promise on related audio tasks, including CM and ASV, their use for SASV remains unexplored, despite their capacity to produce natural-language rationales for auditing and robustness beyond discriminative predictions. This work systematically evaluates LALMs for SASV against conventional pipelines under zero-shot prompting, supervised adaptation, reasoning-oriented training, and reinforcement-learning-based optimization. Our results show that pretrained LALMs are near chance in the zero-shot setting, confirming that they are not natively suited to SASV, but that task-specific adaptation closes this gap. We further find that competitive SASV performance can be achieved through several distinct routes. These findings position LALMs as a promising and auditable foundation for unified SASV, while clarifying where conventional cascade systems still lead.
Audio large language models (ALLMs) can understand speech content, yet their ability to use speaker identity for verification remains limited. We propose TS-SP (Two-Stage Speaker Preservation), a parameter-efficient framework for learning speaker-preserving representations and making them accessible to an ALLM's language-model component. We instantiate and evaluate TS-SP on Qwen2.5-Omni-7B. First, we adapt the audio encoder with speaker identity supervision. We then freeze the adapted encoder and train the language model to compare speakers. Both stages use low-rank adaptation (LoRA), keeping the pretrained base weights fixed. On Vox1-O, TS-SP reduces the equal error rate (EER) from 7.01% for the Paired Loss Adaptation Baseline to 4.37%. EER remains within 4.31--4.79% under unseen prompts. Cross-domain evaluation on CN-Celeb yields a similar EER to the baseline, but lower accuracy at the native decision threshold. These findings support two-stage adaptation for improving speaker verification on the evaluated backbone.
Junjie Li, Zheng Liang, Zhe Li +2
Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China · Speech, Language, and Cognition Laboratory, The University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR, China · National University of Singapore