Text-to-video (T2V) generation models have made rapid progress in producing visually high-quality and temporally coherent videos. However, existing benchmarks primarily focus on perceptual quality, text-video alignment, or physical plausibility, leaving a critical aspect of action understanding largely unexplored: object state change (OSC) explicitly specified in the text prompt. OSC refers to the transformation of an object's state induced by an action, such as peeling a potato or slicing a lemon. In this paper, we introduce OSCBench, a benchmark specifically designed to assess OSC performance in T2V models. OSCBench is constructed from instructional cooking data and systematically organizes action-object interactions into regular, novel, and compositional scenarios to probe both in-distribution performance and generalization. We evaluate six representative open-source and proprietary T2V models using both human user study and multimodal large language model (MLLM)-based automatic evaluation. Our results show that, despite strong performance on semantic and scene alignment, current T2V models consistently struggle with accurate and temporally consistent object state changes, especially in novel and compositional settings. These findings position OSC as a key bottleneck in text-to-video generation and establish OSCBench as a diagnostic benchmark for advancing state-aware video generation models.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Overview of OSCBench evaluation. (a) Representative failure cases from regular, novel, and compositional object state change scenarios. In the regular case, the red box marks an implausible state change of the lemon during slicing. In the novel case, the model misinterprets the instructed action, resulting in a wrong object transformation. In the compositional case, the yellow box indicates an incomplete state change where the pear remains unpeeled. (b) Human-evaluated multi-dimensional performance of T2V models on OSCBench.
Figure 2: Overview of the OSCBench construction and evaluation pipeline. We build unified action and object categories from instructional cooking data via a human-in-the-loop process, and construct regular, novel, and compositional OSC scenarios as text prompts for video generation. The generated videos are evaluated by humans and MLLMs across multiple criteria, and we analyze their correlations to assess automatic evaluation reliability.
Semantic Adherence
Object State Change
Scene Alignment
Perceptual Quality
Model
Subject
Object
Action
Accuracy
Consistency
Realism
Aesthetics
Open-source models
Open-Sora-2.0 ( Peng et al., 2025 )
0.860
0.734
0.518
0.380
0.428
0.740
0.416
0.540
HunyuanVideo ( Kong et al., 2024 )
0.868
0.826
0.494
0.402
0.510
0.834
0.526
0.688
HunyuanVideo-1.5 ( Team, 2025 )
0.914
0.902
0.656
0.524
0.608
0.876
0.618
0.730
Wan-2.2 ( Wan et al., 2025 )
0.904
0.842
0.616
0.560
0.668
0.894
0.702
0.818
Table 1: Human evaluation results of different T2V models across multiple evaluation dimensions.
Semantic Adherence
Object State Change
Scene Alignment
Perceptual Quality
Model
Subject
Object
Action
Accuracy
Consistency
Realism
Aesthetics
Open-source models
Open-Sora-2.0 ( Peng et al., 2025 )
0.910
0.722
0.616
0.512
0.658
0.892
0.634
0.712
HunyuanVideo ( Kong et al., 2024 )
0.898
0.764
0.562
0.466
0.730
0.948
0.752
0.782
HunyuanVideo-1.5 ( Team, 2025 )
0.982
0.788
0.642
0.546
0.708
0.936
0.736
0.778
Wan-2.2 ( Wan et al., 2025 )
0.950
0.774
0.570
0.518
0.710
0.974
0.768
0.798
Table 2: GPT-5.2–based evaluation results of T2V models on OSCBench across multiple evaluation dimensions.
Figure 3: Overall performance comparison of T2V models based on aggregated evaluation scores from human evaluator and MLLM-based evaluators (Qwen3-VL-30B and GPT-5.2).
Metrics
Semantic Adherence
Object State Change
Scene Alignment
Perceptual Quality
Subject
Object
Action
Accuracy
Consistency
Realism
Aesthetics
τ
ρ
τ
ρ
τ
ρ
τ
ρ
τ
ρ
τ
ρ
τ
ρ
τ
ρ
ViCLIP
0.106
0.132
0.195
0.245
0.288
0.386
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Qwen3-VL-30B
0.406
0.413
0.412
0.429
0.542
0.624
0.426
0.503
0.289
0.341
0.145
0.149
0.269
0.297
0.407
0.426
GPT-5-mini
0.433
0.439
0.428
0.441
0.478
0.543
0.342
0.392
0.243
0.259
0.200
0.206
0.303
0.338
0.514
0.541
GPT-5.2 (w/o CoT)
0.295
0.318
0.409
0.444
0.623
0.703
0.415
0.493
0.303
0.343
0.425
0.447
0.323
0.355
0.393
0.411
Table 3: Correlation between human and MLLM-based automatic evaluations in terms of Kendall’s τ and Spearman’s ρ . The last row reports the mean inter-human correlation for reference.
Figure 4: Sampled video frames generated by different T2V models. State change consistency or noticeable artifacts are highlighted in boxes.
Models
Object State Change Scenario
Regular
Novel
Compositional
Open-source models
Open-Sora-2.0 ( Peng et al., 2025 )
0.410
0.389
0.416
HunyuanVideo ( Kong et al., 2024 )
0.472
0.405
0.437
HunyuanVideo-1.5 ( Team, 2025 )
0.572
0.559
0.556
Wan-2.2 ( Wan et al., 2025 )
0.635
0.531
0.594
Table 4: Human-evaluated object state change scores of T2V models across regular, novel, and compositional scenarios, averaged over accuracy and consistency.
Figure 5: Object state change performance across action categories by human evaluation. Scores are averaged over accuracy and consistency.
Appendix figures & tables12 assets
Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.
Appendix
Benchmarks
#Prompt
SA
PQ
PC
OSC
VBench ( Huang et al., 2024 )
1362
✓
✓
EvalCrafter ( Liu et al., 2024 )
700
✓
✓
T2V-CompBench ( Sun et al., 2025 )
1400
✓
VideoPhy ( Bansal et al., 2024 )
688
✓
✓
PhyGenBench ( Meng et al., 2024 )
160
✓
✓
PhyWorldBench ( Gu et al., 2025 )
1050
✓
✓
Appendix
Table 5: Number of prompts and evaluation dimensions in different T2V generation benchmarks. We abbreviate semantic adherence (SA), perceptual quality (PQ), physical commonsense (PC), and object state change (OSC).
Models
Resolution
Frames
FPS
Duration (s)
Open-Sora-2.0
768 × 768
129
25
5
HunyuanVideo
1280 × 720
129
25
5
HunyuanVideo-1.5
1280 × 720
121
24
5
Wan-2.2
1280 × 720
81
16
5
Kling-2.5-Turbo
1920 × 1080
121
24
5
Veo-3.1-Fast
1280 × 720
144
24
6
Appendix
Table 6: Generation settings of T2V models in terms of resolution, total frames, FPS, and duration.
Figure 6: Data abstraction results and word cloud in OSCBench.
Suppose you are an expert in judging and evaluating the quality of AI-generated videos. Such videos may exhibit anomalies such as unnatural object appearance or disappearance, physically implausible state changes, and temporal inconsistencies across frames. They may also contain visual artifacts or unnatural textures. You are given 20 frames evenly sampled from a 5-second AI-generated video.
Video Prompt:
“A chef with a white apron is slicing leek at a street food stand.”
Your Task:
Analyze these frames chronologically and evaluate the video using the following criteria.
{Criteria}
Appendix
Table 7: Prompt for MLLM to generate the evidence and score for each sampled video. Criteria are the same as those used in the human-evaluation interface.
Semantic Adherence
Object State Change
Scene Alignment
Perceptual Quality
Model
Subject
Object
Action
Accuracy
Consistency
Realism
Aesthetics
Open-source models
Open-Sora-2.0 ( Peng et al., 2025 )
0.978
0.932
0.718
0.656
0.722
0.980
0.796
0.816
HunyuanVideo ( Kong et al., 2024 )
0.966
0.954
0.682
0.648
0.752
0.988
0.846
0.858
HunyuanVideo-1.5 ( Team, 2025 )
0.986
0.958
0.780
0.756
0.808
0.990
0.864
0.864
Wan-2.2 ( Wan et al., 2025 )
0.992
0.952
0.738
0.712
0.820
0.992
0.882
0.910
Appendix
Table 8: Qwan3-VL-30B-based evaluation results of different T2V models across multiple evaluation dimensions.
Semantic Adherence
Object State Change
Scene Alignment
Perceptual Quality
Model
Subject
Object
Action
Accuracy
Consistency
Realism
Aesthetics
Open-source models
Open-Sora-2.0 ( Peng et al., 2025 )
0.918
0.838
0.712
0.794
0.814
0.930
0.722
0.774
HunyuanVideo ( Kong et al., 2024 )
0.960
0.942
0.792
0.718
0.956
0.996
0.908
0.900
HunyuanVideo-1.5 ( Team, 2025 )
0.934
0.914
0.794
0.582
0.788
0.962
0.834
0.788
Wan-2.2 ( Wan et al., 2025 )
0.946
0.944
0.750
0.744
0.970
0.966
0.930
0.946
Appendix
Table 9: GPT-5-mini-based evaluation results of different T2V models across multiple evaluation dimensions.
Figure 7: Example of human and MLLM evaluation on a generated video. Original human evaluation scores averaged over three evaluators are provided for reference. The evidence is generated by GPT-5.2 when scoring with CoT.
Figure 8: Task instructions and evaluation criteria in the human evaluation interface.
Figure 9: Sampled videos of different models in regular OSC scenario.
Figure 10: Sampled videos of different models in novel OSC scenario.
Figure 11: Sampled videos of different models in compositional OSC scenario.
Figure 12: Sampled videos of different models with minimal OSC prompt.
Modern video generators can synthesize convincing scenes while rendering a few characters incorrectly, omitting requested text, or changing it across frames. Measuring these failures is harder than applying OCR independently to each frame: when a scene contains multiple text targets and multiple noisy OCR regions, the evaluator must first determine which observation belongs to which intended text. We introduce TextVBench, a benchmark and evaluation framework that formulates visual-text evaluation as a multi-target, multi-instance spatiotemporal correspondence problem. TextVBench contains two complementary tracks: TextVBench-T2V measures the creation and maintenance of prompt-specified text, while TextVBench-Ref2V measures preservation of text from reference images. Both tracks use target-conditioned candidate selection rather than unconstrained VLM transcription, support one target mapping to multiple OCR regions, and separate frame-level spatial fidelity from cross-frame temporal fidelity. A length-weighted harmonic score summarizes these factors, while extra-text diagnostics expose failure modes hidden by a single OCR score. The benchmark is organized around controlled text, layout, carrier, and motion attributes so that aggregate scores can be traced back to specific capability limits. Across the evaluated model runs, MiniMax-H3 reaches a T2V TextVScore of 68.32, while the strongest Ref2V score is 56.51; attribute slices reveal a pronounced drop as the number of simultaneous reference text regions increases.
Ruiqiang Zhang, Hengyi Wang, Chang Liu +3
Anhui Province Key Laboratory of Digital Security, University of Science and Technology of China
Recent video generation models can produce highly realistic videos from natural language instructions, with visual quality approaching cinematic standards. Existing evaluation benchmarks, however, predominantly assess visual quality, aesthetic appeal and physical plausibility, while paying limited attention to text, an essential medium for conveying information in everyday scenes. A generated video may appear visually compelling and feature lifelike subjects, yet still render the text within the scene incorrectly. To address this overlooked dimension, we introduce VTR-Bench, a systematic benchmark for evaluating the Visual Text Rendering capabilities of video generation models. VTR-Bench situates text within concrete application scenarios, such as advertisements and scientific videos, with 300 carefully constructed prompts spanning five scenario categories. We develop an automated evaluation pipeline with human alignments that separately assesses text fidelity through carrier-specific transcription and scene and motion requirements through a prompt-specific chain of query. Beyond evaluation, we introduce a Keyframe-Guided Agentic Framework in which a Director agent coordinates image and video generation with visual evaluation, guiding iterative refinement and candidate selection through visual feedback. Experiments on 11 state-of-the-art models reveal widespread difficulties in accurately rendering scene text, with the best-performing model recording an overall word error rate (WER) of 0.250. We further analyze text rendering failures to characterize the challenges faced by current video generation models. These findings highlight visual text rendering as a key challenge for video generation and demonstrate a practical path toward improvement. Code is available at https://github.com/hardenyu21/VTR-Bench.
Yu Huang, Jungang Li, Zhiyuan Wang +8
Department of Data Science, City University of Hong Kong · The Hong Kong University of Science and Technology (Guangzhou) · Westlake University +3
Existing text-to-video retrieval benchmarks often permit matching from static appearance, making it difficult to determine whether models capture state changes and final outcomes. We introduce GenState-AI, a benchmark comprising 956 AI-generated videos and 195 verified state-change queries across Toy, Cartoon, Home, and Manipulation domains. Its construction uses prompt-controlled variants that target either conflicting temporal/state outcomes or semantic substitutions. Following human verification, all valid videos contribute to subset-level retrieval pools, while complete query-specific triplets support diagnostic hard-negative ordering. We evaluate VCF-Lik, Qwen3-VL, and LanguageBind using both standard Recall@K and triplet-based consistency metrics. Qwen3-VL (8B) achieves the best macro-average R@1 and triplet consistency, while LanguageBind obtains the highest semantic discrimination accuracy. However, stronger retrieval does not consistently yield correct hard-negative ordering, and Qwen3-VL and LanguageBind remain weak on Manipulation triplets, where VCF-Lik performs substantially better. GenState-AI therefore provides a controlled diagnostic testbed for distinguishing global retrieval quality from fine-grained temporal and semantic grounding in AI-generated videos.