Team LEYA in 10th ABAW Competition: Multimodal Ambivalence/Hesitancy Recognition Approach
Organizations: St. Petersburg Federal Research Center of the Russian Academy of Sciences, St. Petersburg, Russia · HSE University, St. Petersburg, Russia
Abstract
Ambivalence/hesitancy recognition in unconstrained videos is a challenging problem due to the subtle, multimodal, and context-dependent nature of this behavioral state. In this paper, a multimodal approach for video-level ambivalence/hesitancy recognition is presented for the 10th ABAW Competition. The proposed approach integrates four complementary modalities: scene, face, audio, and text. Scene dynamics are captured with a VideoMAE-based model, facial information is encoded through emotional frame-level embeddings aggregated by statistical pooling, acoustic representations are extracted with EmotionWav2Vec2.0 and processed by a Mamba-based temporal encoder, and linguistic cues are modeled using fine-tuned transformer-based text models. The resulting unimodal embeddings are further combined using multimodal fusion models, including prototype-augmented variants. Experiments on the BAH corpus demonstrate clear gains of multimodal fusion over all unimodal baselines. The best unimodal configuration achieved an average MF1 of 70.02%, whereas the best multimodal fusion model reached 83.25%. The highest final test performance, 71.43%, was obtained by an ensemble of five prototype-augmented fusion models. The obtained results highlight the importance of complementary multimodal cues and robust fusion strategies for ambivalence/hesitancy recognition.
Figures & tables
| ID | Model Configuration | BAH sub-corpus | |||||
| Modality | Features | Classifier | Devel. / Valid. (MF1, %) | Test (MF1, %) | Average (MF1, %) | Final test (MF1, %) | |
| 1 | Face | EmotionEfficientNetB0 + Statistical Features | MLP | 65.29 | 60.05 | 62.67 | – |
| 2 | Scene | VideoMAE | Linear Layer | 61.71 | 62.21 | 61.96 | – |
| 3 | Audio | EmotionWav2Vec2.0 + Mamba | Linear Layer | 67.20 | 70.87 | 69.03 | – |
| 4 | Text | TF-IDF | Logistic Regression | 68.30 | 67.75 | 68.03 | – |
| 5 | Text | TF-IDF | CatBoost | 65.56 | 72.02 | 68.79 | – |