GP-VM\timesSMA: Benchmarking General-Purpose Vision Models and Specialized Architectures for 2D Medical Image Segmentation

Despite rapid advances in MIS, fair and reproducible comparisons of segmentation models remain challenging due to heterogeneous datasets, inconsistent evaluation protocols, and rapidly evolving architectures. In particular, comparisons often implicitly assume that model rankings are invariant to data partitioning, preprocessing, metric aggregation, uncertainty estimation, and computational constraints. The lack of extensible and unified evaluation frameworks further limits systematic investigation of new models, datasets, and training paradigms. We present MEDSEGBENCHMARKER (MSB), a configuration-driven framework for controlled benchmarking of 2D MIS. It integrates duplicate and near-duplicate image detection, group-aware data splitting, YAML study specifications, resumable training, hyperparameter optimization, cross-validation, and checkpoint-based evaluation. Rather than retaining only aggregate performance measures, MSB exports sample- and class-level pixel counts and predictions together with the evaluation context. These elementary artifacts enable post-hoc analyses without repeated inference. We demonstrate MSB in a case study involving three heterogeneous 2D datasets and multiple MIS and general-purpose vision models evaluated at 256- and 512-pixel input resolutions. Reaggregation of identical predictions changes the top-ranked architecture in three of six dataset-resolution settings, despite high rank correlations between aggregation strategies. Increasing input resolution produces model- and dataset-dependent performance gains and losses that must be considered alongside empirically measured inference complexity. These results show that seemingly minor choices in evaluation and experimental setup can affect benchmark conclusions. MSB, available at GitHub, provides a practical and extensible basis for making benchmark conditions and evaluation choices explicit and reproducible.

Few-shot medical image segmentation (FS-MIS) aims to segment novel regions of interest (ROIs) from a few annotated support examples. Despite rapid progress, existing FS-MIS solutions span diverse paradigms but are evaluated under inconsistent settings, leaving their relative effectiveness unclear. We introduce FAME, a unified benchmark for evaluating FS-MIS solutions, covering specialists, SAM-based methods, CLIP-based methods, and MLLM-based methods. FAME contains 14,958 test samples across 7 anatomical sites, 9 imaging modalities, and 14 ROI categories, and evaluates models under zero-shot and ten-shot settings with additional assessment of target-absence recognition and generalization under covariate and semantic shifts. Our evaluation reveals several findings. First, effective few-shot segmentation depends on how models exploit support examples: direct visual adaptation generally outperforms prompt-based strategies. Second, increasing support examples improves performance only when models can effectively utilize them. Third, semantic transfer remains substantially more challenging than imaging-domain adaptation, and strong localization ability does not necessarily imply reliable target-absence recognition. We hope FAME provides a comprehensive understanding of current FS-MIS solutions and facilitates the development of more effective and reliable few-shot medical segmentation methods.

The Segment Anything Model with Concepts (SAM3) heralds a new paradigm for open-vocabulary segmentation through natural language interaction, offering significant potential for medical image analysis. However, effectively adapting such a powerful vision-language model to the diverse and nuanced domain of medical imaging remains a key challenge. Naive fine-tuning is parameter-inefficient, while standard Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) methods introduce prohibitive computational overhead, limiting their clinical applicability. To address this, we propose Dual-Adaptive SAM3 (DA-SAM3), a novel framework that achieves both high segmentation accuracy and extreme parameter efficiency via a dual-adaptive specialization mechanism. Our first adaptation is task-aware: a Dynamic Expert Router (DER) that sparsely activates the most relevant experts by jointly reasoning about the visual input and the textual concept prompt, mimicking a clinical consultation process. Our second adaptation is parameter-aware: a Decomposed Parameterized Experts (DPE) design that represents each expert as a shared frozen base (inherited from the pretrained SAM3) and a lightweight trainable low-rank delta, reducing MoE parameter overhead by over 80%. Extensive experiments on multiple public medical segmentation benchmarks demonstrate that Dual-Adaptive SAM3 not only matches or exceeds the accuracy of fully fine-tuned SAM3 and standard MoE baselines, but also achieves a notable 5% gain over current state-of-the-art methods, with interpretable results validating its effectiveness. The code is available at: https://github.com/Reconsider80/DA-SAM3.