cs.CVMar 13, 2026

MIBench: Evaluating LMMs on Multimodal Interaction

Authors: Yu Miao, Zequn Yang, Yake Wei, Ziheng Chen, Haotian Ni, Haodong Duan, Kai Chen, Di Hu

Organizations: Gaoling School of Artificial Intelligence, Renmin University of China, Beijing, China · Beijing Key Laboratory of Research on Large Models and Intelligent Governance, Beijing, China · Beihang University, Beijing, China · Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Shanghai, China

Abstract

In different multimodal scenarios, it needs to integrate and utilize information across modalities in a specific way based on the demands of the task. Different integration ways between modalities are referred to as "multimodal interaction". How well a model handles various multimodal interactions largely characterizes its multimodal ability. In this paper, we introduce MIBench, a comprehensive benchmark designed to evaluate the multimodal interaction capabilities of Large Multimodal Models (LMMs), which formulates each instance as a (con_v , con_t, task) triplet with contexts from vision and text, necessitating that LMMs employ correct forms of multimodal interaction to effectively complete the task. MIBench assesses models from three key aspects: the ability to source information from vision-centric or text-centric cues, and the ability to generate new information from their joint synergy. Each interaction capability is evaluated hierarchically across three cognitive levels: Recognition, Understanding, and Reasoning. MIBench comprises over 10,000 vision-text context pairs spanning 32 distinct tasks. Evaluation of state-of-the-art LMMs show that: (1) LMMs' ability on multimodal interaction remains constrained, despite the scaling of model parameters and training data; (2) they are easily distracted by textual modalities when processing vision information; (3) they mostly possess a basic capacity for multimodal synergy; and (4) natively trained multimodal models show noticeable deficits in fundamental interaction ability. We expect that these observations can serve as a reference for developing LMMs with more enhanced multimodal ability in the future.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. Evaluating Cross-Modal Reasoning Ability and Problem Characteristics with Multimodal Item Response Theory

    Mar 3, 2026Shunki Uebayashi, Kento Masui, Kyohei Atarashi +5Multimodal Model EvaluationMultimodal Reasoning

  2. What We are Missing in Multimodal LLM Evaluation?

    Jun 24, 2026Po-han Li, Shenghui Chen, Sandeep Chinchali +1Spatiotemporal ReasoningMultimodal Large Language Models

  3. M3^3Exam: Benchmarking Multimodal Memory for Realistic User-Agent Interactions

    Jun 5, 2026Zhengjun Huang, Wenxuan Liu, Zhoujin Tian +6Multimodal GroundingEfficient Multimodal Inference