Organizations: Fudan University, Shanghai, China · University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom · Shanghai Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Shanghai, China
Real-world MRI reconstruction systems face the open-world challenge: test data from unseen imaging centers, anatomical structures, or acquisition protocols can differ drastically from training data, causing severe performance degradation. Existing methods struggle with this challenge. To address this, we propose BiasRecon, a bias-calibrated adaptation framework grounded in the minimal intervention principle: preserve what transfers, calibrate what does not. Concretely, BiasRecon formulates open-world adaptation as an alternating optimization framework that jointly optimizes three components: (1) frequency-guided prior calibration that introduces layer-wise calibration variables to selectively modulate frequency-specific features of the pre-trained score network via self-supervised k-space signals, (2) score-based denoising that leverages the calibrated generative prior for high-fidelity image reconstruction, and (3) adaptive regularization that employs Stein's Unbiased Risk Estimator to dynamically balance the prior-measurement trade-off, matching test-time noise characteristics without requiring ground truth. By intervening minimally and precisely through this alternating scheme, BiasRecon achieves robust adaptation with fewer than 100 tunable parameters. Extensive experiments across four datasets demonstrate state-of-the-art performance on open-world reconstruction tasks.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Transferability analysis. (a) Open-world distribution shifts from anatomy, center, and modality changes. Models trained on FastMRI knee (inside dashed box) are tested on three OOD scenarios. (b) t-SNE visualization of features from bottom (deeper) and top (shallow) layers across different domains. (c) Frequency decomposition analysis of low-frequency and high-frequency components across different domains.
Figure 2: Overview of BiasRecon framework. The top panel illustrates the alternating optimization process of BiasRecon. The framework consists of three key components: a) Frequency-guided Prior Calibration, which adaptively adjusts feature distributions through parameter-efficient modulation; b) Score-based reverse sampling process as the foundation; and c) Regularization Parameter Adaptation, which dynamically balances measurement consistency and prior constraints.
Figure 3
Method
FastMRI Knee (In-Distribution)
FastMRI-Brain (Cross-Anatomy)
PSNR ↑
SSIM ↑
LPIPS ↓
PSNR ↑
SSIM ↑
LPIPS ↓
Zero-filling
19.83±1.52
0.691±0.025
0.329±0.031
23.72±1.83
0.785±0.028
0.236±0.022
Conventional CS method
TV
26.04±1.63
0.771±0.023
0.313±0.025
28.14±1.86
0.817±0.027
0.187±0.024
Internal deep image prior
ConvDecoder
29.97±2.15
0.745±0.029
0.257±0.027
31.27±2.73
0.876±0.022
0.141±0.022
Table 1: Open-world MRI reconstruction performance under 8 × acceleration with Gaussian 1D sampling.
Figure 5: Qualitative comparison of MRI reconstruction results under 8 × Gaussian 1D undersampling.
Method
Metric
Gaussian 1D
Uniform 1D
4 ×
8 ×
4 ×
8 ×
TV
PSNR
33.65 ± 1.29
28.14 ± 1.86
28.59 ± 1.69
25.71 ± 1.61
SSIM
0.868 ± 0.017
0.817 ± 0.027
0.801 ± 0.031
0.725 ± 0.043
LPIPS
0.136 ± 0.017
0.187 ± 0.024
0.174 ± 0.028
0.254 ± 0.043
ConvDecoder
PSNR
33.19 ± 2.41
31.27 ± 2.73
31.94 ± 2.35
26.27 ± 2.86
SSIM
0.892 ± 0.020
0.876 ± 0.022
0.860 ± 0.034
0.728 ± 0.070
Table 2: Robustness against different sampling patterns and acceleration factors on open-world FastMRI-brain dataset. Comparison includes both Gaussian 1D and Uniform 1D sampling at 4 × and 8 × acceleration rates.
Method
PSNR ↑
SSIM ↑
LPIPS ↓
Baseline
30.23±3.57
0.844±0.035
0.187±0.028
w/o RPA
31.28±3.22(↑1.05)
0.855±0.035(↑.011)
0.183±0.029(↓.004)
w/o FPC
32.51±4.04(↑2.28)
0.853±0.058(↑.009)
0.157±0.065(↓.030)
Ours (FPC + RPA)
33.17±3.11(↑2.94)
0.866±0.041(↑.022)
0.138±0.027(↓.049)
Table 3: Ablation study on Cross-Center shift under 4 × Gaussian 1D acceleration. FPC: Frequency-guided Prior Calibration; RPA: Regularization Parameter Adaptation.
Department of Mathematics, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32611, USA. · Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA 30303, USA.