Causal Tracing of Audio-Text Fusion in Large Audio Language Models

Large audio-language models (LALMs) convey acoustic evidence to language decoders through native audio tokens, yet the internal roles of these tokens remain poorly understood. Using temporal audio grounding as a diagnostic setting, we examine how language-model fine-tuning affects the layerwise semantics, decoder accessibility, and temporal output alignment of native audio-token states through four complementary analyses: query-conditioned token semantics, calibrated token readout, temporal-window probes, and residual-delta erasure during generation. Alongside substantial improvements in temporal localization, semantic analysis of Qwen2.5-Omni shows that latent evidence for queried events is already present before fine-tuning and that the audio tokens most strongly aligned with the queried event appear at similar temporal positions before and after fine-tuning. After fine-tuning, event-related information in audio tokens becomes more accessible to the decoder, especially in early and middle layers, and a cross-checkpoint control shows that this improvement arises primarily from decoder adaptation. Temporal probes show that the base checkpoint already contains recoverable information about annotated windows and that fine-tuning mainly improves alignment with each checkpoint's own predicted temporal support. Residual-delta erasure further shows that removing audio-token updates within predicted windows harms timestamp generation more than removing the same number of randomly selected updates. The same broad improvements in decoder readability and prediction alignment also appear in Qwen2-Audio. Together, these results support a semantics-to-readout account in which grounding fine-tuning helps the decoder read existing event evidence and connect it more reliably to temporal outputs.

Large Audio Language Models (LALMs) achieve strong performance on a variety of audio understanding tasks but continue to struggle with temporal reasoning, a fundamental capability central to human auditory perception. Understanding the causes of these failures remains challenging as existing benchmarks report performance gaps without probing underlying mechanisms. To address this, we introduce a benchmark with 1,657 questions across three foundational tasks designed specifically for mechanistic analysis. Examining model outputs across varying input settings (behavioral analysis) reveals that models often under-utilize audio when textual cues are available. We also provide the first causal mechanistic analysis of temporal reasoning failures in LALMs. Comparing attention upweighting against scaling, we find that redistributing attention across audio tokens is more effective than increasing audio attention. Targeting task-relevant tokens yields further gains. These findings suggest that modality imbalance alone cannot explain failures. Attention scaling at bottleneck layers improves accuracy from 55.9% to 59.1% without fine-tuning, demonstrating a promising direction for future work.

While Audio Large Language Models (Audio LLMs) excel at multimodal understanding, they suffer from text dominance, a bias where models blindly favor text over acoustic evidence, causing hallucinations. However, the internal mechanisms underlying how these models behave when audio and textual inputs contradict each other remain unexplored. In this work, we present the first mechanistic analysis of this phenomenon by tracing the propagation of internal representations across layers. Our investigation reveals three key findings: (i) text dominance is systematically and empirically across models; (ii) while text and audio rely on functionally distinct pathways, they ultimately converge into a shared semantic space in late layers; and (iii) the text pathway does not erase audio information, but rather actively suppresses intact audio representations. Building on these insights, we leverage back-patching, a training-free intervention that routes late-layer audio activations back into earlier layers. This amplifies the audio representations, enabling them to overcome textual suppression. Our evaluation shows that back-patching consistently reduces text dominance, paving the way for mechanistic multimodal alignment under conflict.