Benchmarking the Energy Cost of Assurance in Neuromorphic Edge Robotics
Organizations: Department of Computing, Imperial College London, London, United Kingdom
Abstract
Deploying trustworthy artificial intelligence on edge robotics imposes a difficult trade-off between high-assurance robustness and energy sustainability. Traditional defense mechanisms against adversarial attacks typically incur significant computational overhead, threatening the viability of power-constrained platforms in environments such as cislunar space. This paper quantifies the energy cost of assurance in event-driven neuromorphic systems. We benchmark the Hierarchical Temporal Defense (HTD) framework on the BrainChip Akida AKD1000 processor against a suite of adversarial temporal attacks. We demonstrate that unlike traditional deep learning defenses which often degrade efficiency significantly with increased robustness, the event-driven nature of the proposed architecture achieves a superior trade-off. The system reduces gradient-based adversarial success rates from 82.1% to 18.7% and temporal jitter success rates from 75.8% to 25.1%, while maintaining an energy consumption of approximately 45 microjoules per inference. We report a counter-intuitive reduction in dynamic power consumption in the fully defended configuration, attributed to volatility-gated plasticity mechanisms that induce higher network sparsity. These results provide empirical evidence that neuromorphic sparsity enables sustainable and high-assurance edge autonomy.
Figures & tables
| Configuration | Clean F1 | ASR (PGD) | ASR (Jitter) | Latency (ms) | Energy ( J) | Norm. Activity |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 1.00 | |||||
| + Input Assurance | 1.08 | |||||
| + Neuronal Assurance | 1.02 | |||||
| + Synaptic Assurance | 0.94 |
| Attack Type | Parameter | Baseline | Full Defense |
|---|---|---|---|
| PGD | |||
| ( Norm) | |||
| Temporal Jitter | ms | ||
| (Max Shift) | ms | ||
| ms |
| Configuration | Device | Overhead | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | |||
| + Input Assurance | |||
| + Neuronal Assurance | |||
| + Synaptic Assurance |
Adversarial Robustness
Adversarial robustness studies how well AI systems withstand deliberately crafted inputs, training-data corruption, and other attacks.
See all 479 papers