CodecMOS-Accent: A MOS Benchmark of Resynthesized and TTS Speech from Neural Codecs Across English Accents
Authors: Wen-Chin Huang, Nicholas Sanders, Erica Cooper
Organizations: Nagoya University, Japan · University of Edinburgh, United Kingdom · National Institute Of Information And Communications Technology, Japan
We present the CodecMOS-Accent dataset, a mean opinion score (MOS) benchmark designed to evaluate neural audio codec (NAC) models and the large language model (LLM)-based text-to-speech (TTS) models trained upon them, especially across non-standard speech like accented speech. The dataset comprises 4,000 codec resynthesis and TTS samples from 24 systems, featuring 32 speakers spanning ten accents. A large-scale subjective test was conducted to collect 19,600 annotations from 25 listeners across three dimensions: naturalness, speaker similarity, and accent similarity. This dataset does not only represent an up-to-date study of recent speech synthesis system performance but reveals insights including a tight relationship between speaker and accent similarity, the predictive power of objective metrics, and a perceptual bias when listeners share the same accent with the speaker. This dataset is expected to foster research on more human-centric evaluation for NAC and accented TTS.
Figures & tables
System
S-NAT
S-SPK-SIM
S-ACC-SIM
O-WER
O-SPK-SIM
O-ACC-SIM
O-UTMOS
Ground Truth
4.045 ± 0.063
4.756 ± 0.042
4.678 ± 0.050
1.911
1.000
1.000
4.082
NanoCodec [ 23 ]
4.073 ± 0.062
4.558 ± 0.055
4.493 ± 0.062
0.640
0.872
0.907
4.116
FACodec [ 19 ]
4.070 ± 0.061
4.671 ± 0.048
4.609 ± 0.053
0.650
0.861
0.908
4.100
NeuCodec [ 24 ]
4.048 ± 0.064
4.116 ± 0.077
4.207 ± 0.074
3.847
0.774
0.847
3.945
SNAC [ 21 ]
3.367 ± 0.080
4.268 ± 0.069
4.252 ± 0.071
4.318
0.697
0.802
3.567
Mimi 4.4kbps [ 20 ]
3.261 ± 0.074
4.302 ± 0.066
4.276 ± 0.069
1.700
0.695
0.796
3.534
Table 1: System-level evaluation results comparing Ground Truth, resynthesis, and TTS models. The table reports subjective scores (S-NAT, S-SPK-SIM, S-ACC-SIM) as mean values ±95% confidence intervals, and objective metrics (O-WER, O-SPK-SIM, O-ACC-SIM, O-UTMOS) as mean values. Background color intensity indicates relative performance within each column, where darker blue denotes better performance (higher scores for all metrics except O-WER, for which lower is better). Systems are grouped by category and sorted by S-NAT score.
Metric
S-NAT
S-SPK-SIM
S-ACC-SIM
Utterance-level
S-NAT
1.00
S-SPK-SIM
0.31
1.00
S-ACC-SIM
0.26
0.75
1.00
O-WER
-0.15
-0.04
-0.03
O-SPK-SIM
0.31
0.39
0.34
Table 2: Pearson correlation coefficients of all metrics with respect to the subjective scores (S-NAT, S-SPK-SIM, S-ACC-SIM) in the utterance-level (top) and system-level (bottom). Color intensity denotes the magnitude.
Metric
Same Accent
Diff. Accent
p -value
Ground truth only
S-NAT
4.145
4.026
0.160
S-SPK-SIM
4.855
4.737
0.011
S-ACC-SIM
4.831
4.650
< 0.001
All
S-NAT
3.616
3.489
< 0.001
Table 3: Mean subjective scores from listeners sharing the speaker’s accent (Same Accent) and listeners with a different accent (Diff. Accent). Results are reported separately for ground truth only and the full dataset (“All”). p -values are derived from Welch’s t-test.
S-NAT
S-SPK-SIM
S-ACC-SIM
Speaker Accent
Avg
Min
Avg
Min
Avg
Min
South African
0.90
0.88
0.77
0.65
0.78
0.64
Australian
0.86
0.84
0.71
0.59
0.68
0.61
English
0.86
0.84
0.72
0.59
0.75
0.71
Northern Irish
0.85
0.76
0.79
0.72
0.74
0.62
American
0.79
0.75
0.68
0.44
0.75
0.72
Table 4: Spearman’s ρ broken down by test sample accent, with average and minimum values across all valid pairs of listener accent groups evaluating the same subset of systems. Only pairs with a statistically significant correlation ( p -value <0.05 ) are included.
Existing mean opinion score (MOS) prediction models typically predict utterance-level naturalness MOS and can be insensitive to localized pitch-accent errors. We propose Pitch-Accent-focused Speech Quality Assessment (PASQA), which explicitly targets pitch-accent correctness. To train our model, we construct a controlled Japanese accent-error dataset by changing accent patterns using an accent-controllable text-to-speech system, and compute a pseudo accent-quality score from the accent-error rate. PASQA builds on self-supervised representations and employs mora-conditioned fusion, ranking loss, an auxiliary accent-error localization task, and speaker-invariant training. Experiments show that conventional models fail to preserve the ordering by accent-error severity, whereas PASQA achieves high ordering accuracy on both seen and unseen speakers. Further, PASQA shows stronger agreement with human accent-correctness judgments. The code is available at https://github.com/lycorp-jp/PASQA.
Accent text-to-speech (TTS) aims to synthesize speech with a target accent while preserving speaker identity, but faces two key challenges: disentangling accent from speaker characteristics and effectively conditioning speech generation on the two disentangled factors. In this paper, we propose Joycent, a diffusion-based accent TTS framework that addresses both challenges. Our key idea is to separate accent and speaker information in both representation learning and TTS conditioning. Joycent uses WhisAID, a Whisper-based accent encoder with gradient reversal to learn speaker-disentangled accent representations, and introduces layer-specific conditional layer normalization to inject accent and speaker information at different stages of the text encoder. We evaluate Joycent on the Mandarin Regional Accent Corpus (MRAC) with seen and unseen speakers, including a challenging cross-accent setting where the speaker and accent prompts come from different accents. Experimental results show that Joycent improves accent similarity over existing methods while maintaining strong speaker similarity, with consistent gains under the challenging cross-accent setting. Subjective evaluation further confirms improved naturalness, accent similarity, and speaker preservation. The audio samples are available at https://oshindow.github.io/joycent/.
Xintong Wang, Junchuan Zhao, Ye Wang
School of Computing, National University of Singapore, Singapore
Automated Text-to-Speech (TTS) evaluation methods (Mean Opinion Score (MOS) predictors and Audio Large Language Model (Audio-LLM) judges) are expected to reflect human perception, yet it is unclear how well they capture the distinct aspects of speech that listeners actually perceive. We deconstruct "naturalness" into a linguistically grounded annotation schema spanning 10 distinct perceptual dimensions, and use it to construct the first dimension-level meta-evaluation benchmark for TTS, comprising 860 utterances annotated by trained linguist raters. Results from benchmarking four MOS predictors and four Audio-LLM judges reveal that MOS predictors are more sensitive to acoustic signal-level properties at the prosodic and paralinguistic levels, while Audio-LLM judges show selective, prompt-dependent detection that favors word-level errors and does not generalize across all dimensions. Neither class reliably captures a breadth of linguistically structured, human-perceptible speech errors. Our dataset, annotation schema, and evaluation code are publicly released to support more targeted and interpretable TTS evaluation.