Robust Building Damage Detection in Cross-Disaster Settings Using Domain Adaptation

Reliable post-disaster building damage assessment (BDA) from satellite imagery is hindered by severe class imbalance, background clutter, and domain shift across disaster types and geographies. In this work, we address these problems and explore ways to improve the MambaBDA, the BDA network of ChangeMamba architecture, one of the most successful BDA models. The approach enhances the MambaBDA with three modular components: (i) Focal Loss to mitigate class imbalance damage classification, (ii) lightweight Attention Gates to suppress irrelevant context, and (iii) a compact Alignment Module to spatially warp pre-event features toward post-event content before decoding. We experiment on multiple satellite imagery datasets, including xBD, Pakistan Flooding, Turkey Earthquake, and Ida Hurricane, and conduct in-domain and crossdataset tests. The proposed modular enhancements yield consistent improvements over the baseline model, with 0.8% to 5% performance gains in-domain, and up to 27% on unseen disasters. This indicates that the proposed enhancements are especially beneficial for the generalization capability of the system.

Timely and accurate disaster damage assessment is crucial for effective emergency response, resource allocation, and recovery. Traditional methods, which often rely on manual inspections or sparse data, are typically slow and error-prone. This paper introduces a novel framework leveraging remote sensing imagery and deep learning to automate building damage classification. Using pre- and post-disaster satellite imagery, our model categorizes buildings into four damage levels: no damage, minor damage, major damage, and destroyed. The core innovation is a multi-modal attention mechanism that fuses bi-temporal features to explicitly detect and assess structural changes. We employ a lightweight ConvNeXT-Tiny backbone to ensure efficient processing without compromising performance. Key contributions include: (1) a cross-attention module for multi-modal data fusion, (2) an optimized preprocessing pipeline for large-scale datasets, and (3) robust data augmentation techniques. Experiments on a large-scale disaster dataset demonstrate an overall classification accuracy of 94.90%. The model effectively discriminates between damage categories and remains resilient to incomplete data. This system significantly improves assessment speed and accuracy, aiding emergency responders in prioritizing interventions. This work advances automated disaster damage detection by integrating multi-temporal imagery with deep learning, offering a scalable solution for real-time response.

Natural disasters such as earthquakes, tropical storms, and floods cause extensive damage to buildings, and rapid, reliable damage maps are essential to guide emergency response. Automating this task, referred to as building damage assessment (BDA), from satellite imagery, has become an active research topic at the intersection of remote sensing, computer vision, and machine learning, particularly since supervised deep learning methods were shown to outperform earlier handcrafted approaches. Yet, despite a decade of intense activity and the release of several large-scale datasets, the field lacks a shared foundation. This chapter revisits the task of BDA from first principles, organized around three pillars: data, evaluation, and methods. We first clarify the candidate task for- mulations and argue for a sensor-agnostic, instance-based definition that tolerates missing pre-event imagery. We then review existing datasets along the axes of sensing modality, temporal configuration, and geographic coverage. On the evaluation side, we show that prevailing practices, largely based on a single aggregate score, are theoretically fragile, and we lay the foundations of a more informative, ranking-based, multi-score protocol. We further review methods ranging from task-specific deep networks to recent Earth observation foundation models, noticing that generalization to unseen events and regions remains an open difficulty. Finally, we discuss how these elements can inform the organization of a BDA challenge, including cross-validation, challenge, and private data-sharing setups designed to build trust between developers and users.