Multi-modal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have significantly advanced video reasoning, yet Video Question Answering (VideoQA) remains challenging due to its demand for temporal causal reasoning and evidence-grounded answer generation. Prevailing end-to-end MLLM frameworks lack explicit structured reasoning between visual perception and answer derivation, causing severe hallucinations and poor interpretability. Existing methods also fail to address three core gaps: faithful visual clue extraction, utility-aware clue filtering, and end-to-end clue-answer alignment. Inspired by hierarchical human visual cognition, we propose ClueNet, a clue-aware video reasoning framework with a two-stage supervised fine-tuning paradigm without extensive base model modifications. Decoupled supervision aligns clue extraction and chain-based reasoning, while inference supervision with an adaptive clue filter refines high-order reasoning, alongside lightweight modules for efficient inference. Experiments on NExT-QA, STAR, and MVBench show that ClueNet outperforms state-of-the-art methods by ≥ 1.1%, with superior generalization, hallucination mitigation, inference efficiency, and cross-backbone compatibility. This work bridges the perception-to-generation gap in MLLM video understanding, providing an interpretable, faithful reasoning paradigm for high-stakes VideoQA applications.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Overall framework of the proposed ClueNet, which mimics the hierarchical human visual cognitive process to enable explicit clue-aware video reasoning.
Figure 2: MLLM attention heatmaps and paired VideoQA results: misaligned attention strongly correlates with incorrect answers, confirming visual perception bias.
Figure 3: Intermediate layers top-probability output token visualization: erroneous visual clue semantic interpretation in intermediate layers propagates to hallucinated reasoning and incorrect final answers, confirming clue cognition bias.
Figure 5: Overview of our two-stage training scheme.
Figure 6: Refining clues and visual information during the training and inference stages.
Model
STAR
NExT-QA
Int
Seq
Pred
Feas
Tot
Cau
Tem
Des
Tot
Closed-source MLLMs
GPT-4o
66.5
75.3
70.2
67.1
71.1
80.1
73.8
84.7
78.9
Qwen-VL-Max
67.6
74.5
67.3
65.8
70.7
79.7
74.1
84.3
78.7
Open-source MLLMs
LongVA [ 53 ]
50.2
54.5
57.2
54.3
53.3
56.9
62.8
65.8
60.2
Table 1: SOTA method comparison on STAR and NExT-QA: multiple-choice task accuracy ( % ). Best and second-best results are bolded and underlined . Total (Tot) denotes the overall accuracy over all test samples.
Table 2: Evaluation on the NExT-OE generative task using WUPS. Best and second-best results are bolded and underlined .
Model
Avg
AS
AP
AA
FA
UA
OE
OI
OS
MD
AL
ST
AC
MC
MA
SC
FP
CO
EN
ER
CI
Closed-source MLLMs
GPT-4o
60.8
65.5
75.5
82.5
48.5
83.5
69.5
72.0
37.5
46.0
41.5
90.0
49.0
46.0
70.5
57.5
47.5
72.0
41.0
59.5
61.0
Qwen-VL-Max
61.4
64.5
77.0
82.0
50.0
85.5
74.0
75.5
36.0
52.0
33.5
91.0
47.0
54.5
64.5
61.0
46.5
74.0
45.0
62.5
51.5
Open-source MLLMs
Cos
49.6
57.5
58.0
57.0
44.0
69.0
50.5
61.0
32.0
37.5
35.0
86.5
48.5
27.5
58.0
47.5
44.5
58.5
39.5
57.0
42.0
LongVA
49.4
53.5
59.0
67.0
43.5
67.5
50.0
59.0
33.0
35.0
33.0
85.5
50.5
30.0
58.5
49.5
43.5
59.0
39.0
51.0
41.0
Table 3: Evaluation on the MVBench benchmark. Best and second-best results are bolded and underlined , respectively. ClueNet achieves the highest average score, excelling particularly in fine-grained temporal and object interaction tasks.
Components
Benchmarks
Inference
Stage 1
Stage 2
KS
ACF
VC
STAR
NExT-QA
Time (s)
GFLOPs
-
-
-
-
-
72.1
81.3
-
-
✓
-
-
-
-
70.8 (-1.3)
80.6 (-0.7)
6.5060
54,197.96
✓
✓
-
-
-
75.1 (+3.0)
83.3 (+2.0)
5.9963
54,026.85
✓
✓
✓
-
-
75.4 (+3.3)
83.4 (+2.1)
6.0443
54,075.02
✓
✓
✓
✓
-
77.6 (+5.5)
84.3 (+3.0)
4.9963
51,355.89
Table 4: ClueNet ablation on STAR and NExT-QA; deltas relative to Row 1 (VideoLLaMA3 [ 51 ] ) baseline. Row 1 inference time omitted (different pipeline).
Figure 7: Oracle experiment results on STAR. Striped and gridded bars denote standard and oracle inference.
Existing Video Large Language Models (Video LLMs) struggle with complex video understanding, exhibiting limited reasoning capabilities and potential hallucinations. In particular, these methods tend to perform reasoning solely relying on the pretrained inherent reasoning rationales whilst lacking perception-aware adaptation to the input video content. To address this, we propose Video-ToC, a novel video reasoning framework that enhances video understanding through tree-of-cue reasoning. Specifically, our approach introduces three key innovations: (1) A tree-guided visual cue localization mechanism, which endows the model with enhanced fine-grained perceptual capabilities through structured reasoning patterns; (2) A reasoning-demand reward mechanism, which dynamically adjusts the reward value for reinforcement learning (RL) based on the estimation of reasoning demands, enabling on-demand incentives for more effective reasoning strategies; and (3) An automated annotation pipeline that constructs the Video-ToC-SFT-1k and Video-ToC-RL-2k datasets for supervised fine-tuning (SFT) and RL training, respectively. Extensive evaluations on six video understanding benchmarks and a video hallucination benchmark demonstrate the superiority of Video-ToC over baselines and recent methods. Code is available at https://github.com/qizhongtan/Video-ToC.
Recent advancements in chain-of-thought (CoT) reasoning have shown promise in enhancing video understanding and reasoning capabilities of multimodal large language models (MLLMs). However, existing CoT-based MLLMs require labor-intensive CoT annotations and incur substantial training and inference overhead. While visual latent reasoning has emerged as a more efficient alternative, existing methods primarily focus on image tasks and heavily rely on additional supervision signals for visual latent generation (e.g., CoT traces, auxiliary images, or fine-grained annotations), limiting their scalability and transferability to video tasks. To bridge this gap, we introduce VideoLatent, a novel MLLM equipped with a latent injection module tailored for video understanding and reasoning. Specifically, VideoLatent learns to perform visual latent reasoning using a new latent self-forcing training paradigm, which comprises latent alignment and latent diversity objectives, and relies solely on standard video-question-answer triplets. Extensive experiments across 14 benchmarks demonstrate that our model consistently outperforms existing standard and latent MLLMs on general video understanding and complex video reasoning. Compared with Video-R1, our VideoLatent achieves superior computational efficiency, reducing training/inference overhead by ∼6×/∼68×. Moreover, experiments demonstrate that our method has strong generalizability to different MLLM backbones and different model scales.
Video reasoning requires Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) to remain grounded in dense evidence, yet existing systems largely adopt "read-once, generate-many" paradigm, in which visual grounding weakens during generation. This phenomenon has been widely observed and is known as Visual Anchoring Decay. To fill this gap, we introduce Latent Video Cache (Latent-VC), a recurrent latent visual cache inserted into the decoder to preserve compact visual memories throughout reasoning. The cache is trained with supervised contrastive cache alignment and vision-grounded GRPO with a latent grounding reward, while maintaining strict train-inference alignment through native decoder hidden states. Built on Qwen3.5-9B, Latent-VC consistently outperforms strong CoT and SFT+GRPO baselines across six video benchmarks, with especially clear gains on grounding-intensive and long-video tasks. In addition, it also achieves higher accuracy with substantially shorter responses, suggesting that latent visual caching improves video reasoning by preserving visual evidence rather than relying on longer textual chains.
Yongheng Zhang, Zhipeng Xu, Hao Wu +4
1Tencent Youtu Lab · 2Tsinghua University · University of Illinois at Chicago