Formalisms for Robotic Mission Specification and Execution: A Comparative Analysis

Designing multi-agent robotic systems requires reasoning across tightly coupled decisions spanning heterogeneous domains, including robot design, fleet composition, and planning. Much effort has been devoted to isolated improvements in these domains, whereas system-level co-design considering trade-offs and task requirements remains underexplored. In this work, we present a formal and compositional framework for the task-driven co-design of heterogeneous multi-robot systems. Building on a monotone co-design theory, we introduce general abstractions of robots, fleets, planners, executors, and evaluators as interconnected design problems with well-defined interfaces that are agnostic to both implementations and tasks. This structure enables efficient joint optimization of robot design, fleet composition, and planning under task-specific performance constraints. A series of case studies demonstrates the capabilities of the framework. Various component models can be seamlessly incorporated, including new robot types, task profiles, and probabilistic sensing objectives, while non-obvious design alternatives are systematically uncovered with optimality guarantees. The results highlight the flexibility, scalability, and interpretability of the proposed approach, and illustrate how formal co-design enables principled reasoning about complex heterogeneous multi-robot systems.

Over the recent years, the field of robotics has been undergoing a transformative paradigm shift from fixed, single-task, domain-specific solutions towards adaptive, multi-function, general-purpose agents, capable of operating in complex, open-world, and dynamic environments. This tremendous advancement is primarily driven by the emergence of Foundation Models (FMs), i.e., large-scale neural-network architectures trained on massive, heterogeneous datasets that provide unprecedented capabilities in multi-modal understanding and reasoning, long-horizon planning, and cross-embodiment generalization. In this context, the current study provides a holistic, systematic, and in-depth review of the research landscape of FMs in robotics. In particular, the evolution of the field is initially delineated through five distinct research phases, spanning from the early incorporation of Natural Language Processing (NLP) and Computer Vision (CV) models to the current frontier of multi-sensory generalization and real-world deployment. Subsequently, a highly-granular taxonomic investigation of the literature is performed, examining the following key aspects: a) the employed FM types, including LLMs, VFMs, VLMs, and VLAs, b) the underlying neural-network architectures, c) the adopted learning paradigms, d) the different learning stages of knowledge incorporation, e) the major robotic tasks, and f) the main real-world application domains. For each aspect, comparative analysis and critical insights are provided. Moreover, a report on the publicly available datasets used for model training and evaluation across the considered robotic tasks is included. Furthermore, a hierarchical discussion on the current open challenges and promising future research directions in the field is incorporated.

Over the last decade, behavior trees (BT) have become one of the dominant behavior models for coordinating missions of robotic systems. Yet empirical evidence on BT adoption in real-world contexts remains limited, especially regarding practitioners experiences and practices. Without practitioner-grounded evidence from both academic and industrial settings, the research community risks developing guidelines and tools that are plausible in principle but only partly aligned with real challenges. This scarcity of evidence leads to ad-hoc practices, impeding software reuse, maintenance, and evolution. This paper reports a mixed-methods study combining a technical action research investigation at an automotive company with a survey of 34 robotics practitioners. Our results indicate that BTs improve team communication and the understandability of robotic decision-making logic, reflecting BTs practical value beyond mission coordination. At the same time, practitioners face multiple non-trivial design and integration decisions, complicated by the lack of adequate guidelines and tool support. These decisions span architectural and language choices when implementing BTs and integrating them within ROS, for which we report observed patterns. Additionally, practitioners faced multi-factor granularity decisions and mixed experiences with current libraries. For the most used BT libraries, they reported implementation challenges and documentation gaps. Regarding planning algorithms, practitioners find deciding optimal BT node ordering challenging. Views on scalability remained inconclusive, and limitations in current libraries and practices hinder broader adoption. We conclude with cross-cutting observations and implications for both practitioners adopting BTs in robotic systems and researchers aiming to advance empirical understanding of BT adoption.