cond-mat.mes-hallMar 17, 2026

3D tomography of exchange phase in a Si/SiGe quantum dot device

Authors: Dylan Albrecht, Sarah Thompson, N. Tobias Jacobson, Ryan Jock

Organizations: Sandia National Laboratories, Albuquerque NM, USA

Abstract

The exchange interaction is a foundational building block for the operation of spin-based quantum processors. Extracting the exchange interaction coefficient J(V)J(\mathbf{V}), as a function of gate electrode voltages, is important for understanding disorder, faithfully simulating device performance, and operating spin qubits with high fidelity. Typical coherent measurements of exchange in spin qubit devices yield a modulated cosine of an accumulated phase, which in turn is the time integral of exchange. As such, extracting J(V)J(\mathbf{V}) from experimental data is difficult due to the ambiguity of inverting a cosine, the sensitivity to noise when unwrapping phase, as well as the problem of inverting the integral. As a step toward obtaining J(V)J(\mathbf{V}), we tackle the first two challenges to reveal the accumulated phase, φ(V)φ(\mathbf{V}). We incorporate techniques from a wide range of fields to robustly extract and model a 3D phase volume for spin qubit devices from a sequence of 2D measurements. In particular, we present a measurement technique to obtain the wrapped phase, as done in phase-shifting digital holography, and utilize the max-flow/min-cut phase unwrapping method (PUMA) to unwrap the phase in 3D voltage space. We show this method is robust to the minimal observed drift in the device, which we confirm by increasing scan resolution. Upon building a model of the extracted phase, we optimize over the model to locate a minimal-gradient ππ exchange pulse point in voltage space. Our measurement protocol may provide detailed information useful for understanding the origins of device variability governing device yield, enable calibrating device models to specific devices during operation for more sophisticated error attribution, and enable a systematic optimization of qubit control. We anticipate that the methods presented here may be applicable to other qubit platforms.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables2 assets

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. Reconstructing Quantum Dot Charge Stability Diagrams with Diffusion Models

    Mar 27, 2026Vinicius Hernandes, Joseph Rogers, Rouven Koch +5Image Reconstruction

  2. Unsupervised Deep Learning for Limited-Angle STEM-EDX Tomography -- Application to 3D Chemical Analysis of Phase-Change Memory Devices

    Jun 9, 2026Daniel del Pozo Bueno, Serge Brosset, Theo Monniez +3Deep Image PriorImage Reconstruction

  3. Automatic Charge State Tuning of 300 mm FDSOI Quantum Dots Using Neural Network Segmentation of Charge Stability Diagram

    Apr 15, 2026Peter Samaha, Amine Torki, Ysaline Renaud +4