MedCL-Bench: Benchmarking stability-efficiency trade-offs and scaling in biomedical continual learning

Continual learning (CL) is essential for deploying medical image segmentation models in clinical environments where imaging domains, anatomical targets, and diagnostic tasks evolve over time. However, continual segmentation still faces three main challenges. First, the scenarios for this task remain insufficiently standardized for real-world clinical settings. Second, existing research has been primarily focused on mitigating forgetting, overlooking the other essential properties such as plasticity. Third, a benchmark work with comprehensive evaluation on existing methods is stll desirable. To address these gaps, we present such benchmark study of continual medical image segmentation. We first define three clinically motivated scenarios, namely Domain-CL, Class-CL, and Organ-CL, to respectively capture the cross-center domain shift, the incremental anatomical structure segmentation, and the cross-organ segmentation. We then introduce an evaluation framework that measures not only general performance and forgetting, but also plasticity, forward generalizability, parameter efficiency, and replay burden. The results, from extensive experiments with representative CL methods, showed that it was still challenging to develop a model that could satisfy all the requirements simultaneously. Nevertheless, these studies also suggested that the replay-based methods achieve the best overall balance between stability and plasticity, the parameter-isolation methods should be effective at reducing forgetting, though at the cost of increased model size, and the forward generalizability remain a significantly understudied aspect of this research field. Finally, we discuss related learning paradigms and outline future directions for continual medical image segmentation.

Deploying medical visual question answering (MedVQA) systems in real-world clinical settings requires models that adapt to new clinical tasks without forgetting previously acquired knowledge. Continual learning (CL) provides a practical framework for this setting. Despite rapid progress in medical vision-language models, the behavior of CL methods when training these models across heterogeneous MedVQA tasks remains underexplored. This work presents a systematic evaluation of CL for MedVQA across diverse clinical objectives, including classification, multi-label classification, detection, cell counting, and report generation. Specifically, we explore (1) the ability of existing CL methods to mitigate catastrophic forgetting; (2) their sensitivity to task ordering, analyzing how different task sequences influence performance retention and forgetting; and (3) the evolution of low-rank adaptation parameters as new tasks are learned, revealing patterns of weight drift under different CL methods. Our findings suggest that existing CL methods struggle to maintain stability-plasticity balance when tasks with different objectives and supervision formats are interleaved. Code and full experimental setup will be publicly available.

Medical vision-language models (VLMs) such as BiomedCLIP generalize broadly, but adapting them to a clinical service is as much a safety problem as an accuracy one. Updating a deployed model for a new imaging modality can fail silently in two ways that harm patients: it can forget modalities it already handled (catastrophic forgetting), and it can drift from its trustworthy pretrained prior toward modality-specific shortcuts. We study parameter-efficient continual adaptation through these two properties rather than leaderboard accuracy, presenting CADRE: a frozen-backbone framework combining low-rank adaptation (LoRA) with an online, self-scaling, similarity-aware elastic weight consolidation term that bounds retained-competence loss, and an anchor-to-prior penalty bounding embedding drift from the frozen prior. Two short guarantees, a bound on total consolidation mass and a scale-invariance property, remove the scale-related sources of vanilla EWC's order fragility. Using breast cancer across three maximally dissimilar modalities (histopathology, ultrasound, chest radiography) as a controlled cross-modality stress test, under a multi-seed, multi-order protocol with paired significance testing and training approximately 0.23% of parameters, CADRE attains the highest accuracy, SPQ, and backward transfer and the lowest forgetting among adapting methods, reducing forgetting roughly sevenfold versus the strongest regularized baseline (0.075 to 0.011; paired p=0.023) and achieving positive backward transfer where every baseline is negative. We frame these as stability properties aligned with clinical-safety desiderata, not a deployment guarantee; robustness to distribution shift and adversarial inputs is out of scope.