Facial Movement Dynamics Reveal Workload During Complex Multitasking
Authors: Carter Sale, Melissa N. Stolar, Gaurav Patil, Michael J. Gostelow, Julia Wallier, Margaret C. Macpherson, Jan-Louis Kruger, Mark Dras, Simon G. Hosking, Rachel W. Kallen, Michael J. Richardson
Organizations: School of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia. · Performance and Expertise Research Centre, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia. · Defence Science and Technology Group, Australian Department of Defence, Melbourne, VIC, Australia. · Department of Linguistics, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia. · School of Computing, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Real-time cognitive workload monitoring is crucial in safety-critical environments, yet established measures are intrusive, expensive, or lack temporal resolution. We tested whether facial movement dynamics from a standard webcam could provide a low-cost alternative. Seventy-two participants completed a multitasking simulation (OpenMATB) under varied load while facial keypoints were tracked via OpenPose. Linear kinematics (velocity, acceleration, displacement) and recurrence quantification features were extracted. Increasing load altered dynamics across timescales: movement magnitudes rose, temporal organisation fragmented then reorganised into complex patterns, and eye-head coordination weakened. Random forest classifiers trained on pose kinematics outperformed task performance metrics (85% vs. 55% accuracy) but generalised poorly across participants (43% vs. 33% chance). Participant-specific models reached 50% accuracy with minimal calibration (2 minutes per condition), improving continuously to 73% without plateau. Facial movement dynamics sensitively track workload with brief calibration, enabling adaptive interfaces using commodity cameras, though individual differences limit cross-participant generalisation.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Overview of the OpenMATB experimental setup. (A) Screenshot of the OpenMATB interface, displaying the four concurrent tasks: System Monitoring, Tracking, Communications, and Resource Management. (B) A participant performing the task using a joystick and monitor setup, with simultaneous recording from a webcam.
Figure 2: Top: Mean accuracy (%) and reaction time (ms) across OpenMATB subtasks and load levels for baseline (top row) and experimental (bottom row) blocks. Subtasks include Tracking, Resource Management (ResMan), System Monitoring (SysMon), and Communications (Comms), with average reaction time (Avg RT) shown in the rightmost column. Bars represent means; error bars indicate ±1 SEM. Load conditions are colour-coded: Low (blue), Moderate (yellow), and High (red). Bottom: Pairwise Pearson correlations between subtask performance metrics across load conditions. Red asterisks indicate significant correlations ( p<.05 ). Warm colours represent stronger positive correlations.
Figure 3: Bar plots show mean values across load conditions (Low, Moderate, High) for four key facial movement features. Top-left: Pupil Velocity (RMS) increased progressively, particularly from moderate to high load, reflecting increased vertical visual scanning. Top right: Mouth aperture (mean) increased steadily across both load transitions, consistent with greater communication task demands. Bottom left: Blink aperture (mean) decreased progressively, indicating narrowed eye opening under load. Bottom right: Head rotation velocity (mean) showed a threshold effect, increasing only at high load. Error bars represent ±1 SEM.
Figure 4: Head and mouth dynamics show opposite trajectories in recurrence (%REC) and determinism (%DET) across load levels. From low to moderate load, head motion became less repetitive and predictable, reflecting fragmentation of movement patterns. At high load, head motion determinism rebounds, indicating reorganisation into more structured dynamics. In contrast, mouth aperture becomes increasingly repetitive and structured with rising load. Bars represent means ± SEM.
Figure 5: Cross-recurrence between head position and gaze decreases with cognitive load. Left panel: Mean percentage of recurrent points (%REC) in cross-recurrence quantification analysis (CRQA) between horizontal head movement (head translation X) and horizontal pupil displacement across low, moderate, and high workload conditions. Error bars represent standard error of the mean. Right panels: Representative cross-recurrence plots from a single participant showing the same time window under low (middle) and high (right) cognitive load conditions. Each red point indicates a moment when head and gaze movements exhibited similar dynamical patterns (recurrent states). The denser recurrence structure in the low condition reflects more consistent coordination between head and gaze movements, while the sparser structure in the high condition indicates reduced coupling as task demands increase. Axes show time-delayed embedded dimensions of the respective time series.
Figure 6: Balanced accuracy (left) for models trained with different feature sets (Linear, Nonlinear, Combined, Task Performance, and their combinations) under Cross-Task and Cross-Participant validation. Percentages above bars indicate mean accuracy across 15 random seeds; error bars show standard deviation. Confusion matrices (right) for the Random Forest model trained on linear kinematic pose features (top) and task performance features (bottom) under Cross-Task (left) and Cross-Participant (right) validation. Cell values indicate class-wise prediction percentages, averaged over 15 seeds.
Figure 7: Participant-specific models were trained with increasing amounts of experimental data (2-11 60-second windows per condition, bottom x-axis) and evaluated on held-out test windows (top x-axis, grey). Thin lines show individual participants; thick lines show population means with shaded ±1 SD. (Left) Task performance metrics (accuracy and reaction time across MATB subtasks) showed minimal improvement with additional training data, plateauing around 45-51% balanced accuracy. (Right) Pose kinematics (facial and head movement velocity, acceleration, displacement) improved continuously throughout the tested range, reaching 73% accuracy at 11 windows per condition with no evidence of plateau. Individual variability was considerable (SD > 20% at later training sizes), with some participants achieving > 80% accuracy early while others required more extensive calibration. Numbers above points indicate population mean accuracy.
DV
Definition / Computation
Recurrence Rate (RR)
% of points in the recurrence matrix with distance ≤ϵ
Determinism (DET)
% of recurrent points forming diagonal lines ≥lmin
Mean Line Length
Mean length of diagonal lines ≥lmin
SD Line Length
Standard deviation of diagonal line lengths ≥lmin
Entropy
Shannon entropy of the diagonal line length distribution
Complexity
Residual information: max entropy minus observed entropy
Cognitive workload monitoring is important for adaptive rehabilitation and assistive interfaces, where task difficulty, pacing, and feedback should be adjusted according to the user's cognitive state to avoid overload and under-challenge. Emerging extended reality and robot-assisted rehabilitation environments provide controllable training tasks, but they require unobtrusive sensing methods that can capture rapid ocular dynamics during interaction. Existing eye-movement-based cognitive workload recognition methods mainly rely on frame-based eye trackers, which often suffer from limited temporal resolution and degraded robustness under rapid eye movements. In contrast, event cameras provide microsecond-level temporal resolution, high dynamic range and low latency, making them suitable for capturing fine-grained ocular dynamics. Many previous studies rely on free-viewing or similar paradigms, where gaze locations can vary across tasks. As a result, models may learn associations between gaze-location distributions and cognitive workload, rather than workload-related eye movement characteristics themselves. In this work, we introduce EveLoad, which, to the best of our knowledge, is the first event-based eye-movement dataset with graded cognitive workload annotations, collected from 20 healthy participants under spatially constrained and task-driven conditions using a controlled N-back-guided fixation paradigm. Based on this dataset, we establish a benchmark for cognitive workload recognition with six workload levels and propose a learning framework that encodes spatiotemporal event representations. Experimental results show that our approach achieves an average subject-specific accuracy of 96.36% and 96.13% under mixed random split evaluation. These results suggest that event-based eye movements may provide a useful sensing pathway for future workload-aware rehabilitation.
Accurate and generalizable estimation of cognitive workload from electroencephalography (EEG) is critical for human-centered and safety-critical systems. Although EEG is widely used for workload assessment, the consistency of region-level EEG contributions across tasks, datasets, and subjects remains unclear. This paper presents a region-level evaluation framework for EEG-based workload prediction in which models are trained and evaluated using features extracted exclusively from electrodes belonging to anatomically defined scalp regions. We perform a large-scale analysis across four publicly available EEG workload datasets spanning diverse task demands, recording hardware, and electrode montages. Region importance is quantified using a model-agnostic, performance-based approach under both mixed-subject and subject-independent evaluation protocols, with results aggregated using a rank-based strategy to ensure robustness across experimental configurations. Across all datasets and subject-independent evaluations, frontal electrode groups outperform the full-scalp baseline by approximately 15-20% in relative rank position while using substantially fewer electrodes. Fronto-central regions exhibit the most stable predictive utility, whereas posterior and occipital regions contribute less consistently across experimental conditions. These findings indicate that workload-relevant EEG information is most consistently retained within frontal and fronto-central electrode groups, supporting the design of efficient and generalizable EEG-based workload monitoring systems.
Jacob Wong, Sohan Singh, Prannaya Gupta +3
School of InfoComm Technology, Ngee Ann Polytechnic · Engineering Product Development Pillar, Singapore University of Technology and Design · NUS High School of Math and Science
Humans recognize movements effortlessly, even from noisy and complex visual input. But what information in the stimulus allows humans to rapidly classify movements? No framework has systematically compared different strategies of movement analysis to address this question. Here, we used videos of 16 daily activities from the MoVi dataset and compared three strategies: Temporal Movement Primitives (TMPs), which decompose movements into weighted sums of temporally smooth basis functions; Legendre polynomial coefficients, which project joint-coordinate trajectories onto an orthogonal polynomial basis; and Autoencoder latent embeddings. Legendre coefficients and TMPs achieved the highest classifier accuracy, followed by autoencoders. We found two discriminative features for movement classification. The most informative is the general posture of the body, the average spatial configuration that distinguishes one activity from another. Additionally, we identified 9 critical joints that are most predictive for movement classification. Interestingly, good classification accuracy did not automatically lead to good movement generation: when we reconstructed movements for each activity, TMPs preserved the temporal dynamics and produced perceptually natural motion, whereas reconstructions from Legendre coefficients retained only the average posture and appeared frozen. These results reveal a dissociation in how movement information is organized: the static configuration of the body suffices to classify what activity is performed, but the temporal dynamics of movement are required to reconstruct how it unfolds. This distinction clarifies which features the visual system may rely upon for rapid action recognition, and suggests that postural features could enable efficient movement screening in clinical applications, while dynamic information remain essential wherever movement generation is the goal.
Arefeh Farahmandi, Gunnar Blohm
Centre for Neuroscience Studies Queen’s University Kingson, Ontario, Canada