The Spillover Effects of Peer AI Rinsing on Corporate Green Innovation

As artificial intelligence and generative large language models drive industrial upgrading, capital markets increasingly focus on AI-themed listed firms. Information asymmetry and technological opacity lower the cost of exaggerating AI capabilities relative to genuine R&D, spurring widespread AI Washing. Using China's A-share market from 2018Q1 to 2025Q2, we advance literature in measurement and mechanism testing. We construct a multimodal AI Washing Risk Score (AWRS) via Qwen-VL to assess text-image consistency in annual reports and roadshows, and a Material Real-Investment Matching Index (MRMI) from patent quality, AI intangible asset capitalization, and technical personnel compensation using PCA. Four findings emerge: (1) AWRS lacks predictive power for future MRMI, with a wider rhetoric-action gap among financially constrained firms; (2) substantive AI investment boosts high-quality patents, while empty rhetoric crowds out industry innovation; (3) long-horizon institutional investors detect AI Washing through site visits and reduce holdings; (4) such divestment triggers analyst downgrades, retail selling, and sharp valuation corrections within 180 days. Results are robust to IV-2SLS and staggered DID using the ChatGPT shock. This study enhances disclosure and pricing-efficiency research and supports RegTech for curbing thematic speculation.

In the context of the rapid development of digital finance, some financial technology companies exhibit the phenomenon of "AI washing," where they overstate their AI capabilities while underinvesting in actual AI resources. This paper constructs a corporate-level AI washing index based on CHFS2019 data and AI investment data from 15-20 financial technology companies, analyzing and testing its impact on farmers' digital financial behavior response. The study finds that AI washing significantly suppresses farmers' digital financial behavior; the higher the degree of AI washing, the lower the response level of farmers' digital financial behavior. Moreover, AI washing indirectly inhibits farmers' behavioral responses by exacerbating knowledge exclusion and risk exclusion. Social capital can positively moderate the negative impact of AI washing; among farmer groups with high social capital, the suppressive effect of AI washing on digital financial behavior is significantly weaker than that among groups with low social capital. In response, this paper suggests that regulatory authorities establish a strict information disclosure system for AI technology, conduct differentiated digital financial education to enhance the identification capabilities of vulnerable groups, promote digital financial mutual aid groups to leverage the protective effects of social capital, improve the consumer protection mechanism for farmers in digital finance, and set up pilot "Digital Inclusive Finance Demonstration Counties," etc.

Corporate AI-washing-the strategic misrepresentation of AI capabilities via exaggerated or fabricated cross-channel disclosures-has emerged as a systemic threat to capital market information integrity with the widespread adoption of generative AI. Existing detection methods rely on single-modal text frequency analysis, suffering from vulnerability to adversarial reformulation and cross-channel obfuscation. This paper presents AWASH, a multimodal framework that redefines AI-washing detection as cross-modal claim-evidence reasoning (instead of surface-level similarity measurement), built on AW-Bench-the first large-scale trimodal benchmark for this task, including 88412 aligned annual report text, disclosure image, and earnings call video triplets from 4892 A-share listed firms during 2019Q1-2025Q2. We propose the Cross-Modal Inconsistency Detection (CMID) network, integrating a tri-modal encoder, a structured natural language inference module for claim-evidence entailment reasoning, and an operational grounding layer that cross-validates AI claims against verifiable physical evidence (patent filing trajectories, AI-specific talent recruitment, compute infrastructure proxies). Evaluated against six competitive baselines, CMID achieves an F1 score of 0.882 and an AUC-ROC of 0.921, outperforming the strongest text-only baseline by 17.4 percentage points and the latest multimodal competitor by 11.3 percentage points. A pre-registered user study with 14 regulatory analysts verifies that CMID-generated evidence reports cut case review time by 43% while increasing true positive detection rates by 28%. These findings confirm the technical superiority and practical applicability of structured multimodal reasoning for large-scale corporate disclosure surveillance.