cs.CRMar 19, 2026

Automated Membership Inference Attacks (AutoMIA): Discovering MIA Signal Computations using LLM Agents

Authors: Toan TranOlivera KotevskaLi Xiong

Abstract

Membership inference attacks (MIAs), which enable adversaries to determine whether specific data points were part of a model's training dataset, have emerged as an important framework to understand, assess, and quantify the potential information leakage associated with machine learning systems. Designing effective MIAs is a challenging task that usually requires extensive manual exploration of model behaviors to identify potential vulnerabilities. In this paper, we introduce AutoMIA -- a novel framework that leverages large language model (LLM) agents to automate the design and implementation of new MIA signal computations. By utilizing LLM agents, we can systematically explore a vast space of potential attack strategies, enabling the discovery of novel strategies. Our experiments demonstrate AutoMIA can successfully discover new MIAs that are specifically tailored to user-configured target model and dataset, resulting in improvements of up to 0.18 in absolute AUC over existing MIAs. This work provides the first demonstration that LLM agents can serve as an effective and scalable paradigm for designing and implementing MIAs with SOTA performance, opening up new avenues for future exploration.

Explore similar work

Jun 16, 2026cs.LG

CheckMIABench: Firm Foundations For Membership Inference Attacks on Language Models

Membership inference attacks (MIAs) are a canonical way to assess a machine learning model's privacy properties. Although several attempts have been made to evaluate MIAs on language models, the extant literature has suffered numerous difficulties in constructing clean evaluations to test new techniques. In particular, subtle distribution shifts between member and non-member sets can undermine the statistical validity of MIAs; recent work has underscored this by showing that "blind" methods with no access to the underlying model can perform far better than published methods on the same benchmarks. This paper constructs a benchmark for principled evaluation of MIAs against LLMs, by leveraging the insight that training data before and after a fixed point during training are drawn from the same distribution. Therefore, all open-source models with intermediate checkpoints and public training data can be converted into MIA testbeds. We apply our framework to a half-dozen published attacks on the Pythia and OLMo family of models, from 70M to 7B parameters. To facilitate further privacy research, we open-source a modular library for designing and implementing attacks in this setting: https://github.com/safr-ai-lab/pandora_llm.
Jeffrey G. Wang, Jason Wang, Marvin Li +1
May 27, 2026cs.CR

MRMMIA: Membership Inference Attacks on Memory in Chat Agents

Membership inference attacks (MIAs) test whether a target data record belongs to a system's private data, and have become a standard tool to measure privacy leakage in machine learning systems. Prior work has primarily focused on training corpora or retrieval databases. However, MIAs against agent memory have received less attention, even though such memory can contain sensitive user-agent interactions, retrieved facts, and user preferences. Therefore, in this work, we focus on chat agent memory MIAs, where an adversary infers whether a candidate memory unit belongs to the chat agent's memory store. We propose Multi-Recall Memory MIA (MRMMIA), a unified attack that utilizes multiple recall probes to the agent to extract the membership signal across black-box, gray-box, and white-box settings. Our experiments demonstrate that MRMMIA consistently outperforms baselines. Our results expose the privacy risk in agents and provide an initial evaluation framework for membership leakage in chat-agent memory systems.
Kai Chen, Yan Pang, Tianhao Wang
Feb 21, 2026cs.LG

LoMime: Query-Efficient Membership Inference using Model Extraction in Label-Only Settings

Membership inference attacks (MIAs) threaten the privacy of machine learning models by revealing whether a data point was used during training. Existing MIAs often assume access to public datasets, shadow models, confidence scores or the training distribution, which makes them vulnerable to defenses like confidence masking. Label-only MIAs avoid these assumptions but require thousands of queries per sample. We propose a cost-effective label-only MIA framework based on transferability and model extraction. Querying the target MM with active sampling, perturbation-based selection and synthetic data, we extract a surrogate SS on which membership inference is performed offline. This shifts query overhead to a one-time extraction phase. It also removes the restriction that defines the label-only setting: the attacker controls SS and can read its posteriors and training trajectory, so attacks that cannot be run against MM can be run against SS. On Location, Purchase and Texas, the strongest attack on SS improves AUC over the direct attack on MM by 0.90.9, 5.65.6 and 5.05.0 percentage points, and improves the true positive rate at 1%1\% false positive rate by 2.8×2.8\times to 6.3×6.3\times. We characterize how leakage transfer depends on surrogate fidelity, evaluate standard defenses, and report preliminary results on image datasets.
Abdullah Caglar Oksuz, Anisa Halimi, Erman Ayday