While Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) have advanced audio captioning, robust evaluation remains difficult. Reference-based metrics are expensive and often fail to assess acoustic fidelity, while Contrastive Language-Audio Pretraining (CLAP)-based approaches frequently overlook syntactic errors and fine-grained details. We propose CAF-Score, a reference-free metric that calibrates CLAP's coarse-grained semantic alignment with the fine-grained comprehension and syntactic awareness of LALMs. By combining contrastive audio-text embeddings with LALM reasoning, CAF-Score effectively detects syntactic inconsistencies and subtle hallucinations. Experiments on the BRACE benchmark demonstrate that our approach achieves the highest correlation with human judgments, even outperforming reference-based baselines in challenging scenarios. These results highlight the efficacy of CAF-Score for reference-free audio captioning evaluation. Code and results are available at https://github.com/inseong00/CAF-Score.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Overview of audio captioning evaluation metrics. Traditional metrics (top left) depend on ground-truth reference captions. Although CLAPScore enables reference-free evaluation, it lacks fine-grained semantic understanding and frequently overlooks syntactic errors. Inspired by FLEUR, a vision-domain approach, the proposed CAF-Score addresses these limitations by integrating the coarse-grained semantic alignment of CLAP with the fine-grained semantic reasoning and syntactic awareness of LALMs, resulting in stronger alignment with human preference judgments.
Figure 2: Overall architecture of CAF-Score. The framework comprises two parallel branches. The CLAP-based coarse-grained semantic alignment branch applies a sliding-window strategy to the input audio and computes cosine similarity with the candidate caption using CLAP encoders; Max pooling is then used to select the most salient segment score (S-CLAPScore). The LALM-based evaluation branch assesses caption fidelity using an LALM. Rather than relying on discrete text generation, it computes a FLEUR score from token probability distributions to capture fine-grained semantic and syntactic information. The final CAF-Score is obtained as a weighted combination of the two metrics. Notably, our framework operates entirely at inference time, utilizing frozen pre-trained backbones without requiring additional training or fine-tuning.
Model (Method)
BRACE-Main
BRACE-Hallucination
AudioCaps-Main
Clotho-Main
Overall
AudioCaps-Hallu
Clotho-Hallu
Overall
HH
HM
MM
Total
HH
HM
MM
Total
Reference-free
CLAPScore (CLAP-ONLY)
MS-CLAP
64.03
48.76
55.08
53.71
67.07
70.92
65.93
67.95
61.42
72.99
85.23
80.61
LAION-CLAP
63.31
77.30
65.42
69.78
59.28
75.64
65.63
68.62
69.15
87.03
84.31
85.34
Table 1: Performance comparison on the BRACE benchmark, including BRACE-Main and BRACE-Hallucination subsets. The upper section reports reference-free metrics (standalone CLAP, LALM, and the proposed CAF-Score), while the lower section reports reference-based baselines for comparison. The Overall column represents the weighted average across subsets based on sample counts. AF3 denotes AudioFlamingo3. Within the CAF-Score results, AF3 and Qwen3 correspond to AudioFlamingo3-Base and Qwen3-Omni-Instruct, respectively. The configuration combining Qwen3-Omni-Instruct with M2D-CLAP achieves the highest overall performance.
Backbone
Pool
Clotho-Main (CAF-Score)
HH
HM
MM
Total
MS-CLAP
X
68.86
78.00
67.56
71.65
Avg
66.47
78.59
69.48
72.54
Max
67.66
79.17
70.07
73.21
LAION-CLAP
X
61.08
78.59
67.85
71.06
Avg
61.68
80.35
67.70
71.72
Table 2: Comparison of pooling strategies for CAF-Score (using Qwen3-Omni-Instruct) evaluated on Clotho-Main across different CLAP backbones. The pooling methods are: no pooling (X), average pooling (Avg), and maximum pooling (Max).
Figure 3: Performance variation of CAF-Score across different weighting parameters α on BRACE-Main.
Method
MS-CLAP
LAION-CLAP
MGA-CLAP
M2D-CLAP
Best Fixed α
0.2
0.8
0.5
0.8
Fixed α
70.11
72.24
71.32
73.11
Adaptive α
70.03
71.99
71.15
69.99
Table 3: Comparison of optimal fixed α versus entropy-based adaptiveα on BRACE-Main.
Figure 4: Tie rates in raw scores for AudioFlamingo3 (AF3) and Qwen3-Omni models.
Figure 5: LALM-driven Correction on TIKTOK_1.wav .
Figure 6: CLAP-driven Stability on Cafeteria Ambience.wav .
Figure 7: Double Failure on lama2.wav .
Figure 8: Insufficient Calibration on 105166.wav .
Figure 9: Over-calibration on 108925.wav .
Model
RELATE
PAM
LCC
SRCC
KTAU
LCC
SRCC
KTAU
RELATE [ 28 ]
0.385
0.383
0.265
-
-
-
RELATE w/ CB [ 28 ]
0.377
0.374
0.259
-
-
-
CLAPScore (CLAP-ONLY)
MS-CLAP
0.256
0.224
0.153
0.345
0.312
0.215
LAION-CLAP
0.404
0.386
0.268
0.461
0.452
0.314
Table 4: Full performance comparison on TTA benchmarks including RELATE and PAM datasets. We report Pearson (LCC), Spearman (SRCC), and Kendall’s Tau (KTAU) correlations with human judgments.
Audio-language model evaluation tests whether systems understand speech, music, and environmental sound reliably, fairly, and with evidence grounded in audio.
We introduce AudioCapBench, a benchmark for evaluating audio captioning capabilities of large multimodal models. \method covers three distinct audio domains, including environmental sound, music, and speech, with 1,000 curated evaluation samples drawn from established datasets. We evaluate 13 models across two providers (OpenAI, Google Gemini) using both reference-based metrics (METEOR, BLEU, ROUGE-L) and an LLM-as-Judge framework that scores predictions on three orthogonal dimensions: accuracy (semantic correctness), completeness (coverage of reference content), and hallucination (absence of fabricated content). Our results reveal that Gemini models generally outperform OpenAI models on overall captioning quality, with Gemini3Pro achieving the highest overall score (6.00/10), while OpenAI models exhibit lower hallucination rates. All models perform best on speech captioning and worst on music captioning. We release the benchmark as well as evaluation code to facilitate reproducible audio understanding research.
Contrastively pretrained audio-language models (e.g., CLAP) excel at clip-level understanding but struggle with frame-level tasks. Existing extensions fail to exploit the varying granularity of real-world audio-text data, where massive clip-level textual descriptions coexist with limited frame-level annotations. This paper proposes Fine-grained Language-Audio Pretraining (FineLAP), a novel training paradigm that advances both clip- and frame-level alignment in CLAP with heterogeneous data. FineLAP introduces a dual-stream sigmoid loss with a cluster-based sampling strategy to jointly learn from clip- and frame-level supervision. To capture both global semantics and local details, FineLAP uses a decoupled audio projector on top of a self-supervised encoder. To alleviate the scarcity of temporally annotated data, we present FineLAP-100k, a large-scale synthetic SED dataset constructed through a scalable curation pipeline. Extensive experiments demonstrate that FineLAP achieves SOTA performance across multiple audio understanding tasks, including retrieval, classification, sound event detection, and text-to-audio grounding. Ablation studies further show that coarse- and fine-grained alignment are mutually beneficial, providing insights for building better audio-language models (ALMs).
Xiquan Li, Xuenan Xu, Ziyang Ma +4
X-LANCE Lab, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China · SJTU Paris Elite Institute of Technology, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, China · Shanghai Innovation Institute, China +1
Large Audio-Language Models show consistent performance gains across speech and audio benchmarks, yet high scores may not reflect true auditory perception. If a model can answer questions without processing the acoustic signal, the benchmark fails as a measure of auditory understanding. We present a diagnostic framework using two axes: text prior, which measures answerability from text and general knowledge alone, and audio reliance, which assesses actual dependency on the acoustic signal. Evaluating eight LALMs across three benchmarks, we find that models retain 60-72% of their full audio scores even without any audio input. Moreover, among items that require audio, only 3.0-4.2% need the complete audio clip; the majority can be resolved using localized fragments. These findings challenge the assumption that benchmark performance equals robust audio understanding, and we conclude with practical guidelines for improving evaluation reliability and benchmark design.
Leonardo Haw-Yang Foo, Chih-Kai Yang, Chen-An Li +2
National Taiwan University · NTU Artificial Intelligence Center of Research Excellence (NTU AI-CoRE)