Current no-reference image quality assessment (NR-IQA) models for enhanced images often struggle to generalize, as they tend to overfit to the distinct patterns of specific enhancement algorithms rather than evaluating genuine perceptual quality. To address this issue, we propose a preference-guided debiasing framework for no-reference enhancement image quality assessment (EIQA). Specifically, we first learn a continuous enhancement-preference embedding space using supervised contrastive learning, where images generated by similar enhancement styles are encouraged to have closer representations. Based on this, we further estimate the enhancement-induced nuisance component contained in the raw quality representation and remove it before quality regression. In this way, the model is guided to focus on algorithm-invariant perceptual quality cues instead of enhancement-specific visual fingerprints. To facilitate stable optimization, we adopt a two-stage training strategy that first learns the enhancement-preference space and then performs debiased quality prediction. Extensive experiments on public EIQA benchmarks demonstrate that the proposed method effectively mitigates algorithm-induced representation bias and achieves superior robustness and cross-algorithm generalization compared with existing approaches.
Figures & tables
Fig. 1: Different enhancement algorithms may produce distinct visual styles, causing algorithm-dependent bias in quality representation. The proposed preference-guided debiasing framework explicitly models enhancement preference and removes its interference, leading to more reliable perceptual quality prediction.
Fig. 2: Overall framework of the proposed method. First, a preference encoder is pretrained with supervised contrastive learning to capture enhancement-preference representations. Second, the learned preference cue is fed into a bias predictor to estimate the bias vector, which is then subtracted from the raw quality feature to obtain a debiased representation for MOS regression.
Fig. 3: Illustration of the proposed preference-guided debiasing method for enhancement image quality assessment. The model first learns a preference embedding from enhanced images to characterize algorithm-dependent enhancement styles, then predicts the corresponding bias term and removes it from the raw quality feature, yielding an algorithm-invariant quality representation for more reliable MOS prediction.
Methods
Type
SRCC
PLCC
KRCC
NIQE [ 10 ]
Handcrafted
0.0200
0.0040
0.0240
BRISQUE [ 9 ]
Handcrafted
0.0302
0.0463
0.0271
ILNIQE [ 16 ]
Handcrafted
0.0956
0.0972
0.0565
IS [ 45 ]
Handcrafted
0.0869
0.0898
0.0483
DBCNN [ 21 ]
Deep-learning
0.4631
0.5131
0.3640
HyperIQA [ 11 ]
Deep-learning
0.6158
0.6702
0.4828
TABLE I: Comparison with state-of-the-art no-reference IQA methods on the RLIE dataset.
Methods
Type
SRCC
PLCC
KRCC
NIQE [ 10 ]
Handcrafted
0.1378
0.1572
0.0550
BRISQUE [ 9 ]
Handcrafted
0.1532
0.1813
0.0593
ILNIQE [ 16 ]
Handcrafted
0.1807
0.1975
0.0610
IS [ 45 ]
Handcrafted
0.1631
0.1760
0.0574
DBCNN [ 21 ]
Deep-learning
0.7934
0.8056
0.6373
HyperIQA [ 11 ]
Deep-learning
0.7419
0.7676
0.5769
TABLE II: Comparison with state-of-the-art no-reference IQA methods on the SQUARE-LOL dataset.
SRCC ↑
PLCC ↑
Methods
Standard
Unseen
Drop ↓
Standard
Unseen
Drop ↓
DBCNN [ 21 ]
0.7934
0.7406
0.0528
0.8056
0.7626
0.0430
HyperIQA [ 11 ]
0.7419
0.6911
0.0508
0.7676
0.7132
0.0544
MUSIQ [ 12 ]
0.7729
0.7424
0.0305
0.7942
0.7644
0.0298
UNIQUE [ 46 ]
0.7766
0.7309
0.0457
0.7899
0.7597
0.0302
TReS [ 23 ]
0.7803
0.7106
0.0697
0.8002
0.7271
0.0731
TABLE III: Cross-algorithm generalization evaluation on the SQUARE-LOL dataset under the algorithm-disjoint protocol. “Standard” denotes the result under the default evaluation protocol, “Unseen” denotes the result on unseen enhancement algorithms, and “Drop” is the performance decrease from Standard to Unseen. The best results are highlighted in bold.
Method
SRCC ↑
PLCC ↑
KRCC ↑
w/o Preference
0.8557
0.8689
0.6802
+ Preference Concat
0.8616
0.8773
0.6834
+ Preference-Guided Debiasing
0.8726
0.8913
0.6904
TABLE IV: Effect of preference-guided debiasing on the SQUARE-LOL dataset. The best results are highlighted in bold.
Method
SRCC ↑
PLCC ↑
KRCC ↑
w/o Preference
0.8557
0.8689
0.6802
Cls-based Preference
0.8701
0.8865
0.6892
SupCon-based Preference (Ours)
0.8726
0.8913
0.6904
TABLE V: Effect of preference representation learning on the SQUARE-LOL dataset. The best results are highlighted in bold.
Training Strategy
SRCC ↑
PLCC ↑
KRCC ↑
Joint Training
0.8510
0.8645
0.6809
Two-Stage w/o Freezing
0.8673
0.8792
0.6864
Two-Stage w/ Freezing (Ours)
0.8726
0.8913
0.6904
TABLE VI: Effect of different training strategies on the SQUARE-LOL dataset. The best results are highlighted in bold.
Sampling Strategy
SRCC ↑
PLCC ↑
KRCC ↑
Random Sampling
0.8527
0.8656
0.6868
Algorithm-Balanced Sampling
0.8578
0.8690
0.6863
Content-Controlled Sampling (Ours)
0.8726
0.8913
0.6904
TABLE VII: Effect of different sampling strategies for preference learning on the SQUARE-LOL dataset. The best results are highlighted in bold.
Fig. 4: Qualitative comparison on images enhanced by different algorithms. Images in each row share the same source content but exhibit different enhancement styles. Although their MOS values are relatively similar, the model without preference guidance produces inconsistent predictions, while the proposed method yields predictions that are more stable and closer to the ground-truth MOS. Red numbers indicate relatively large prediction errors.
No-Reference Image Quality Assessment (NR-IQA) aims to estimate perceptual quality without access to a reference image of pristine quality. Learning an NR-IQA model faces a fundamental bottleneck: its need for a large number of costly human perceptual labels. We propose SHAMISA, a non-contrastive self-supervised framework that learns from unlabeled distorted images by leveraging explicitly structured relational supervision. Unlike prior methods that impose rigid, binary similarity constraints, SHAMISA introduces implicit structural associations, defined as soft, controllable relations that are both distortion-aware and content-sensitive, inferred from synthetic metadata and intrinsic feature structure. A key innovation is our compositional distortion engine, which generates an uncountable family of degradations from continuous parameter spaces, grouped so that only one distortion factor varies at a time. This enables fine-grained control over representational similarity during training: images with shared distortion patterns are pulled together in the embedding space, while severity variations produce structured, predictable shifts. We integrate these insights via dual-source relation graphs that encode both known degradation profiles and emergent structural affinities to guide the learning process throughout training. A convolutional encoder is trained under this supervision and then frozen for inference, with quality prediction performed by a linear regressor on its features. Extensive experiments on synthetic, authentic, and cross-dataset NR-IQA benchmarks demonstrate that SHAMISA achieves strong overall performance with improved cross-dataset generalization and robustness, all without human quality annotations or contrastive losses.
Mahdi Naseri, Zhou Wang
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada
Existing full-reference image quality assessment (FR-IQA) methods achieve high-precision evaluation by analysing feature differences between reference and distorted images. However, their performance is constrained by the quality of the reference image, which limits real-world applications where ideal reference sources are unavailable. Notably, the human visual system has the ability to accumulate visual memory, allowing image quality assessment on the basis of long-term memory storage. Inspired by this biological memory mechanism, we propose a memory-driven quality-aware framework (MQAF), which establishes a memory bank for storing distortion patterns and dynamically switches between dual-mode quality assessment strategies to reduce reliance on high-quality reference images. When reference images are available, MQAF obtains reference-guided quality scores by adaptively weighting reference information and comparing the distorted image with stored distortion patterns in the memory bank. When the reference image is absent, the framework relies on distortion patterns in the memory bank to infer image quality, enabling no-reference quality assessment (NR-IQA). The experimental results show that our method outperforms state-of-the-art approaches across multiple datasets while adapting to both no-reference and full-reference tasks.
Low-light image enhancement algorithms (LIEAs) aim to improve the visibility of images captured under poor illumination. However, the enhancement process often introduces artifacts such as noise amplification, color shift, structural damage, and over-exposure, which degrade the perceptual quality of the enhanced images. Therefore, a reliable image quality assessment (IQA) metric for evaluating enhancement effects is of great importance for both the development of LIEAs and their practical applications. In this paper, we present LEIQ-Assessor, a multi-dimensional quality assessment model for low-light image enhancement based on multi-task learning, developed for the QoMEX 2026 Grand Challenge on Low-light Enhanced Image Quality Assessment. Specifically, our method leverages a pre-trained SigLIP2 Vision Transformer as the backbone and simultaneously predicts the overall Mean Opinion Score (MOS) together with six perceptual sub-attributes: lightness, color fidelity, noise level, exposure quality, naturalness, and content recovery. By jointly optimizing these correlated objectives via the PLCC loss, the shared representation captures richer quality-aware features than its single-task counterpart. Experiments on the MLE benchmark demonstrate that LEIQ-Assessor significantly outperforms existing no-reference IQA models and hand-crafted quality descriptors. Our method achieved second place in the QoMEX 2026 Grand Challenge on Low-light Enhanced Image Quality Assessment. The code is available at https://github.com/sunwei925/LEIQ-Assessor.
Wei Sun, Yanwei Jiang, Dandan Zhu +4
East China Normal University · Shanghai Jiao Tong University