cs.CVMar 17, 2026

Mix-and-Match Pruning: Globally Guided Layer-Wise Sparsification of DNNs

Authors: Danial Monachan, Samira Nazari, Mahdi Taheri, Ali Azarpeyvand, Milos Krstic, Michael Huebner, Christian Herglotz

Organizations: Brandenburg Technical University, Cottbus, Germany · University of Zanjan, Iran · Tallinn University of Technology, Estonia · Leibniz Institute for High Performance Microelectronics, Frankfurt Oder, Germany

Abstract

Deploying deep neural networks (DNNs) on edge devices requires strong compression with minimal accuracy loss. This paper introduces Mix-and-Match Pruning, a globally guided, layer-wise sparsification framework that leverages sensitivity scores and simple architectural rules to generate diverse, high-quality pruning configurations. The framework addresses a key limitation that different layers and architectures respond differently to pruning, making single-strategy approaches suboptimal. Mix-and-Match derives architecture-aware sparsity ranges, e.g., preserving normalization layers while pruning classifiers more aggressively, and systematically samples these ranges to produce ten strategies per sensitivity signal (magnitude, gradient, or their combination). This eliminates repeated pruning runs while offering deployment-ready accuracy-sparsity trade-offs. Experiments on CNNs and Vision Transformers demonstrate Pareto-optimal results, with Mix-and-Match reducing accuracy degradation on Swin-Tiny by 40% relative to standard single-criterion pruning. These findings show that coordinating existing pruning signals enables more reliable and efficient compressed models than introducing new criteria.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

May 23, 2026

Pruning Deep Neural Networks via the Marchenko--Pastur Distribution

We study a Marchenko--Pastur (MP) random-matrix approach to pruning deep neural networks with very small post-pruning fine-tuning budgets. The main practical contribution is accuracy retention under short calibration and fine-tuning schedules, rather than a long post-pruning reoptimization pipeline. The theory gives deterministic data-path certificates: if the removed component RR has small propagated logit effect Ls∥Rψ1(s)∥∞L_s \| R ψ_1(s) \|_\infty, pruning decreases an elastic-net objective and preserves samples whose dense margin exceeds twice the perturbation. The zero-budget case gives perfect pruning; a prune--restore extension models weight restoration inside a fixed sparse-execution pattern; and an additive L2L_2-regularized model shows admissible random-like components vanish at the training limit, with persistent spikes stabilizing as the MP bulk collapses. Under iid-Gaussian sufficient conditions, the fitted MP edge σ+σ_+ gives a high-probability layerwise budget signal. On ImageNet-1k, after only three distillation epochs, ViT-B/16 2:4+2{:}4{+}ToMe reaches 83.41%83.41\% top-1 (−1.70-1.70 pp from dense) at 59.81%59.81\% sparse-execution MAC reduction, with 1.388×1.388\times best-observed A40 native-2:42{:}4 backend speedup for the same checkpoint and ToMe graph; a separate no-ToMe A100 endpoint gives 2.705×2.705\times. At structured sparsity, ViT-B/16 6:126{:}12 reaches 83.74%83.74\%, ViT-L/16 8:168{:}16 dense+permutation reaches 85.33%85.33\% (−0.51-0.51 pp), and ConvNeXtV2-Base 12:1612{:}16 reaches 86.35%86.35\% (−0.37-0.37 pp). For CNNs, ResNet50 8:168{:}16 dense+permutation reaches 75.87%75.87\% (−0.26-0.26 pp), and ResNet152d CAST-conv+permutation reaches 81.33%81.33\% (−1.53-1.53 pp) at ∼50%{\sim}50\% MAC accounting with a 1.62×1.62\times A40 im2col+2:4+2{:}4 sparse-GEMM audit.
Jun 22, 2026

Hybrid Compression: Integrating Pruning and Quantization for Optimized Neural Networks

Deep neural networks have witnessed remarkable advancements in recent years and have become integral to various applications. However, alongside these developments, training and deployment of neural network models on embedding and edge devices face significant challenges due to limited memory and computational resources. These problems can be addressed with deep neural network compression, which involves a trade-off between model size and performance. In this paper, we propose a novel method for model compression through two phases. First, we utilize model compression techniques, such as pruning and quantization, to significantly reduce the model size. Then, we use Mixture of Experts to route the previously compressed models to enhance performance while maintaining a balance in inference efficiency. MoEs consist of multiple expert models (i.e., compressed models) that are moderately sized and deliver stable performance. Experimental results on several benchmark datasets show that our method successfully compresses CNN models which achieves substantial reductions in FLOPs and parameters with a negligible accuracy drop.
Oct 8, 2026

DADP: Dynamic Activity-Dependent Pruning, A Reverse Hebbian-Inspired Structural Pruning Method

Modern neural networks are heavily over-parameterized. This redundancy incurs substantial compute and memory overhead during training and inference. Existing pruning methods rely on post-hoc magnitude thresholds or static initialization heuristics. Consequently, they often require manual per-layer sparsity targets or expensive retraining cycles. We propose Dynamic Activity-Dependent Pruning (DADP), a biologically inspired structural plasticity mechanism. During training, DADP measures connection importance via the accumulated product of pre-synaptic activations and post-synaptic error gradients. Using a single global threshold instead of fixed layer budgets, DADP dynamically allocates sparsity across network depth while naturally inducing neuron- and channel-level pruning. Across MLP, VGG-16, ResNet-18, BiLSTM-CRF, and MiniBERT architectures, DADP matches or outperforms Magnitude, SNIP and RigL, retaining 73.67% accuracy (dense baseline: 76.06%) at 99% sparsity on ResNet-18. Finally, matrix-based Shannon entropy and effective rank measurements confirm that DADP preserves latent feature diversity at extreme sparsities without representation collapse.