Organizations: MBZUAI, Abu Dhabi, UAE · Rajiv Gandhi University of Knowledge Technologies, India · Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark · Khalifa University, Abu Dhabi, UAE
Medical Vision-Language Models (VLMs) often hallucinate by generating responses based on language priors rather than visual evidence, posing risks in clinical applications. We propose Visual Grounding Score Guided Decoding (VGS-Decoding), a training-free method to mitigate hallucinations during inference. Our key insight is that hallucinated tokens maintain or increase their probability when visual information is degraded, while visually grounded tokens decrease in probability. We introduce the Visual Grounding Score (VGS), which measures each token's visual dependency by comparing distributions from original and distorted images. During decoding, we reweight probabilities by amplifying visually grounded tokens while suppressing hallucinations. Unlike fixed-weight contrastive methods, VGS-Decoding provides per-token adaptive control. Experiments on MIMIC-Diff-VQA and VQA-RAD across LLaVA-Med, CheXagent, and MedGemma demonstrate consistent improvements, with up to +9.12% overall gain and +8.98% in open-ended recall, while introducing only 2× inference overhead and no additional training, making it practical for clinical deployment. Upon acceptance, code will be released publicly to facilitate reproducibility.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Overview of VGS-Decoding. Both the original image V and its noise-distorted version V′ are passed through the medical VLM, producing token distributions Porig (blue) and Pdist (green). The Visual Grounding Score (VGS) is computed as their normalized probability difference and used for multiplicative reweighting: visually grounded tokens (positive VGS) are amplified, while hallucinated tokens (negative VGS, × ) are suppressed.
VQA-RAD
MIMIC-Diff-VQA
Model
Method
Open
Closed
Overall
Δ
Open
Closed
Overall
Δ
LLaVA-Med
Greedy
34.45
68.92
53.64
–
28.04
48.39
35.39
–
VCD
30.85
61.20
47.71
-5.93
25.98
46.42
33.33
-2.06
DoLA
32.76
58.96
47.34
-6.30
28.75
47.94
35.68
+0.29
OPERA
33.22
61.69
49.05
-4.59
21.18
46.02
30.14
-5.25
VGS (Ours)
38.90
72.91
57.75
+4.11
30.84
55.79
39.86
+4.47
Table 1: Performance comparison on VQA-RAD (200 open + 251 closed) and MIMIC-Diff-VQA (8,380 open + 4,741 closed). Best results in bold . VGS-Decoding is the only method that consistently improves all models.
Figure 2: Decoding method comparison on VQA-RAD. VGS-Decoding consistently outperforms baselines across all three medical VLMs.
Configuration
Open
Closed
Overall
Δ
Baseline (Greedy)
34.45
68.92
53.64
–
+ Fixed weight (VCD-style)
30.85
61.20
47.71
-5.93
+ VGS metric only
35.49
69.32
54.32
+0.68
+ VGS + Mult. reweight
38.90
72.91
57.75
+4.11
Table 2: Component ablation study of VGS-Decoding on VQA-RAD (LLaVA-Med). Each row adds one component incrementally.
LLaVA-Med
MedGemma
α
Overall
p -value
Overall
p -value
0.0
53.64
–
56.32
–
0.5
56.95
0.046
59.00
0.002
1.0
57.75
0.025
64.48
0.001
1.5
58.79
0.001
64.37
< 0.001
2.0
57.50
0.014
65.90
< 0.001
Table 3: Effect of reweighting strength α on VQA-RAD. α=0.0 corresponds to greedy decoding. Optimal values per model are in bold .
Medical vision-language models (Med-VLMs) have demonstrated strong performance on medical visual question answering, yet they remain prone to hallucination, generating clinically unsupported statements that are insufficiently grounded in image evidence. Mitigation methods applied during decoding offer a practical solution, but they typically lack anatomical awareness or rely heavily on ground truth annotations, which limits their applicability. We propose Counterfactual Anatomy-guided Spatial-Temporal decoding (CAST), a framework that operates entirely during inference and requires no manual annotations for anatomically grounded hallucination mitigation. CAST automatically discovers anatomical regions relevant to the given query through broad medical segmentation. It then selects a compact, causally informative area using counterfactual intervention based on the drop in answer likelihood under occlusion. Guided by this chosen region, CAST performs a unified contrastive decoding process, combining classifier-free guidance to correct spatial attention with stepwise temporal contrast to regulate generation dynamics. Experiments on the SLAKE and MIMIC-CXR datasets across three Med-VLMs demonstrate that CAST consistently outperforms strong baselines and surpasses decoding strategies reliant on ground truth. Our results indicate that compact, automatically selected regions provide highly effective contrastive guidance without expert annotations, offering a practical and generalizable solution for improving spatial grounding and reducing hallucinations. Code is available at https://github.com/csyifan/CAST.
Yifan Lu, Adinath Dukre, Abhijit Das +4
Mohamed bin Zayed University of Artificial Intelligence, Abu Dhabi, UAE
Large vision-language models (VLMs) frequently suffer from hallucinations, generating content that is inconsistent with visual inputs. Existing methods typically address this problem through post-hoc filtering, additional training objectives, or external verification, but they do not intervene during the decoding process when hallucinations arise. In this work, we introduce SAGE, a Sink-Aware Grounded Decoding framework that mitigates hallucinations by dynamically modulating self-attention during generation. Hallucinations are strongly correlated with attention sink tokens - punctuation or function tokens that accumulate disproportionate attention despite carrying limited semantic content. SAGE leverages these tokens as anchors to monitor grounding reliability in real time. At each sink trigger, the method extracts semantic concepts from the generated sequence, estimates their visual grounding using both self-attention maps and gradient-based attribution, and measures their spatial agreement. Based on this signal, self-attention distributions are adaptively sharpened or broadened to reinforce grounded regions or suppress unreliable ones. Extensive experiments across diverse hallucination benchmarks demonstrate that SAGE consistently outperforms existing decoding strategies, achieving substantial reductions in hallucination while preserving descriptive coverage, without requiring model retraining or architectural modifications. Our method achieves an average relative improvement of 10.65% on MSCOCO and 7.19% on AMBER across diverse VLM architectures, demonstrating consistent gains in hallucination mitigation.
While medical Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have shown promise in assisting diagnosis, they still frequently generate hallucinated responses that appear linguistically plausible but lack visual evidence. Such hallucinations pose risks to clinical decision-making and necessitate effective detection. Existing introspective detection methods primarily perform uncertainty estimation or logical verification by analyzing model responses conditioned on original or perturbed inputs. However, such external perturbations are often heuristic and context-agnostic, which overlooks the internal cross-modal dependency between generated tokens and related visual tokens during decoding. To address this issue, we propose VIHD, a Visual Intervention-based Hallucination Detection method that leverages targeted visual token masking to calibrate semantic entropy for more effective hallucination detection. VIHD locates visually dominant decoder layers via Visual Dependency Probing (VDP), executes Visual Intervention Decoding (VID) via token masking to calibrate the semantic distribution, and quantifies the resulting Calibrated Semantic Entropy (CSE) as a reliable hallucination signal. Extensive experiments on three medical VQA benchmarks with two medical MLLMs demonstrate that VIHD consistently outperforms state-of-the-art methods, underscoring the importance of fine-grained visual dependency for hallucination detection. The code will be available at https://github.com/Jiayi-Chen-AU/VIHD
Jiayi Chen, Benteng Ma, Zehui Liao +3
Department of Data Science & AI, Faculty of Information Technology, Monash University, Melbourne, VIC 3800, Australia · Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong SAR, China · Alfred Health Radiology, Alfred Health, Melbourne, VIC 3004, Australia +1