Shift-Invariant Feature Attribution in the Application of Wireless Electrocardiograms

Electrocardiography (ECG) is a cornerstone of cardiac diagnosis, yet most machine learning methods for ECG analysis lack interpretability, limiting their clinical adoption. We present IECG, a weakly-supervised ECG foundation model that jointly performs diagnostic classification and abnormality localization without requiring manual abnormal region annotations, overcoming a long-standing bottleneck in interpretable ECG learning. Central to IECG is a weakly-supervised attention strategy that explicitly incorporates clinical priors by deriving abnormality heatmap pseudo-labels from established ECG clinical knowledge. These pseudo-labels guide the model's CLS-token attention through a KL-divergence loss, encouraging it to focus on diagnostically relevant waveform regions. During pretraining, IECG is jointly optimized with clinically guided attention supervision, ECG-text contrastive alignment, and report captioning objectives, enabling it to learn rich multimodal representations while producing localized waveform evidence. By explicitly aggregating features from clinically guided attention regions, IECG grounds its diagnostic predictions in interpretable waveform evidence without sacrificing classification performance. Extensive experiments demonstrate that IECG achieves state-of-the-art abnormal region localization while maintaining strong classification performance, advancing trustworthy foundation models for ECG analysis.

Foundation models for 12-lead electrocardiograms (ECGs) transfer well across clinical tasks, but the physiological knowledge encoded in their representations remains opaque. We present CADENCE, a framework that decomposes an ECG foundation model into a human-interpretable, queryable dictionary of physiological concepts. Using a BatchTopK sparse autoencoder, CADENCE factorizes Layer-6 embeddings from more than nine million ECG tokens into 8,192 sparse cardiac atoms. These atoms align better than individual dense embedding dimensions with clinical phenotypes and waveform morphology, recovering arrhythmias, conduction abnormalities, infarction and repolarization patterns, chamber and axis findings, and lead- and beat-phase-specific waveform primitives. At Layer 6, the best atoms achieve mean AUROCs of 0.88 for clinical phenotypes and 0.90 for morphology, versus 0.78 and 0.83 for the best dense dimensions. Sparse atom probes match or outperform dense probes for phenotype, morphology, and age prediction while attributing each prediction to a small set of interpretable atoms; phenotype AUROC improves from 0.93 to 0.95. Atom-space geometry recovers physiologically coherent relationships, and targeted atom ablation selectively changes frozen downstream outputs. An automated LLM pipeline generates and quantitatively validates atom descriptions by predicting held-out activations. On independent external ECG datasets, CADENCE recovers overlapping concepts and maintains consistent phenotype-prediction performance. CADENCE provides a scalable framework for discovering and auditing the physiological knowledge encoded by ECG foundation models.

Explainable AI (XAI) is used to assess whether artificial intelligence models rely on meaningful patterns, yet explanations that appear plausible for individual predictions may systematically misrepresent model behavior. This is particularly problematic in medicine, where models may rely on irrelevant signal characteristics rather than disease-specific patterns without being recognizable. We address this challenge using electrocardiogram (ECG) data, for which clinical guidelines provide explicit knowledge about diagnostically relevant signal regions. We introduce a global, guideline-grounded framework that aggregates explanations across heartbeats to evaluate them against clinically defined regions of interest. Using four binary classifiers trained on PTB-XL, we assess 13 gradient-based methods across two categories of patterns: low-amplitude segments and high-amplitude QRS morphology. Our results reveal a systematic failure of methods transferred from computer vision. Their explanations often follow signal amplitude rather than clinical relevance, with mean Spearman correlations up to 0.69, leading them to overlook diagnostically decisive low-amplitude regions. For ischemia, LRP-$ε$ assigns only 4.6% of relevance to the ST segment, compared with 63.8% for LRP-SIGN. Nine of 13 methods fall below chance for at least one condition, indicating inconsistent reliability across patterns. These findings show that global, domain-grounded evaluation can uncover systematic explanation failures not obvious from sample-level heatmaps.