The information bottleneck (IB) trades compression of an input
X against prediction of a target
Y through a multiplier
β=1/λ, yet each operating point is usually served by training, or fully conditioning, a new encoder. For jointly Gaussian data, we show that the IB solution factorizes as
A(β)=D(β)W: the information-bearing directions
W do not depend on
β, and
β acts only through scalar gains. We ask whether this separation of
representation from
rate control survives beyond Gaussian models, treating the budget as a given operating parameter rather than a quantity to be optimized. For a budget-free representation
F(X), the
separation gap is controlled by the
sufficiency deficit εF=I(X;Y∣F(X)): We show there is at least
εF in the worst case for finite inputs, and it is bounded uniformly in
λ by a function of
εF for finite label alphabets. The same certificate extends to a new target distribution and to pooled multi-domain data, where a conditional-alignment term appears. On MNIST, SVHN, CIFAR-10 and STL-10 (10 seeds, eight prespecified budgets), a frozen CNN representation with one compressor--decoder pair per budget reduces estimated training multiply--accumulate operations (MACs) by
7.7× and wall-clock time by about
2× relative to end-to-end VIBs, and attains higher budget-averaged accuracy (
65.6% versus
57.3% per domain;
67.1% versus
57.1% pooled), with the advantage concentrated at strong compression, where the VIBs collapse. At weak compression (
λ≤0.036), VIB has higher cross-entropy and ECE; its surrogate Lagrangian is higher per domain, indistinguishable from the pooled VIB in the macro average, and lower on the pooled test set.