Clinical Cognition Alignment for Gastrointestinal Diagnosis with Multimodal LLMs

The development of foundation models (FMs) is crucial for advancing endoscopic image analysis. However, existing endoscopy FMs mainly rely on self-supervised learning from uni-modal images or videos, overlooking the rich semantic knowledge contained in clinical reports. Furthermore, effectively leveraging these records is hindered by a fundamental modality gap: structured anatomical descriptions are not naturally mapped to specific frames within the high-redundancy, uncurated visual streams. In this paper, we present EndoVLM, a novel vision-language FM pre-trained on over 348K endoscopic examinations, each pairing a clinical report with its corresponding image collection. An Anatomy-Guided Sparse Pooling mechanism utilizes textual descriptions as queries to drive sparse attention, efficiently aggregating semantically salient frames into anatomy-specific visual representations across redundant image-sets. Next, a Progressive Semantic-Aware Alignment strategy models clinical taxonomy (anatomy and pathological status) via structured soft targets, bridging the gap from global patient-level matching to fine-grained localized alignment. Finally, a Semantic-Concentrated Masked Autoencoder is applied exclusively to these semantic-rich frames, integrating low-level visual precision with robust high-level semantic representation. Extensive experiments across various downstream tasks demonstrate that EndoVLM outperforms existing foundation models and remains competitive with task-specific methods. Remarkably, EndoVLM also exhibits robust zero-shot generalization capabilities, highlighting its potential for broader clinical application.

Gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopic image analysis has shifted from single-label classification toward visual question answering (VQA), where a model must answer free-form clinical questions about an image. While recent vision-language models (VLMs) achieve promising answer accuracy on this task, clinical adoption also requires the model's internal representations to reflect the visual evidence behind its answers. We propose a simple multi-task fine-tuning recipe that constructs auxiliary grounding and description tasks from an existing VQA dataset with minimal additional annotation: expert-annotated polyp masks are reused directly, while a GI-domain pretrained classifier with Grad-CAM localization provides weak supervision for finding categories that lack ground-truth masks. Three small VLM backbones are fine-tuned with low-rank adaptation under matched VQA-only and multi-task recipes on Kvasir-VQA-x1, and we show consistent accuracy gains together with improved implicit alignment between answer tokens and the relevant image region, evaluated on both in-distribution and out-of-distribution data.

Vision-language models (VLMs) are prone to hallucination, which remains a major barrier to their safe deployment in clinical practice. To date, most hallucination detection methods have been evaluated on radiology benchmarks such as MIMIC-CXR and VQA-RAD, while gastrointestinal (GI) endoscopy remains largely underexplored. In this paper, we benchmark nine hallucination detection methods on the Gut-VLM dataset, a GI diagnostic Visual Question Answering (VQA) dataset with 4,392 test VQA pairs, across five VLMs (MedGemma-4B, MedGemma-27B, LLaVA-Med-7B, LLaVA-v1.6-7B, and Lingshu-32B). The methods span three categories: black-box methods (RadFlag, SelfCheckGPT-NLI), gray-box methods (AvgProb, AvgEnt, MaxProb, MaxEnt, Semantic Entropy, and VASE), and a white-box method (ReXTrust). Our results show that ReXTrust, a white-box method, achieves the highest AUC across all five models, outperforming the strongest alternative method on each VLM by a statistically significant margin (paired permutation test, p < 0.001 in all cases), reaching a peak AUC of 93.0 on MedGemma-4B. White-box hidden-state access provides a consistent advantage of 19.5 AUC points on average (range: 9.5--33.5), with ReXTrust maintaining strong performance even on LLaVA-v1.6-7B (AUC 79.9), where black-box methods and clustering-based gray-box methods collapse to near-chance performance. Among non-white-box methods, token-level gray-box statistics (MaxEnt, MaxProb) are the strongest alternatives, outperforming both clustering-based gray-box methods (Semantic Entropy, VASE) and black-box approaches on average. We further identify confident confabulation, a failure mode in which models hallucinate with high inter-sample consistency or high token-level probability, as a systemic failure for both consistency and uncertainty-based methods.