Adversarial Attacks on Locally Private Graph Neural Networks

Built upon local differential privacy (LDP), locally private graph learning protocols have emerged as an important paradigm for decentralized graph learning, balancing privacy protection and learning utility. Under such protocols, each user locally perturbs their node features and adjacency information before transmission, ensuring formal privacy guarantees without original data leaving the device. However, the inherently open participation nature renders these protocols critically vulnerable to data poisoning attacks, where adversaries inject carefully crafted malicious nodes to corrupt neighborhood aggregation and degrade downstream utility. Despite the severity of this threat, effective defenses in this setting remain largely unexplored. In this paper, we propose VERITAS, a poisoning-resilient locally private graph learning protocol built on a trust-but-verify paradigm. By introducing a verification list encoding graded peer trust levels, VERITAS jointly privatizes node features and graph structure on the user side, while exploiting bilateral attestation asymmetry on the server side to identify and prune malicious nodes. Concretely, VERITAS comprises four synergistic stages: (1) local data perturbation, (2) attestation-driven malicious node pruning, (3) utility restoration via dual denoising, and (4) robust private graph learning. Extensive experiments on four real-world benchmark datasets across multiple LDP mechanisms and GNN architectures demonstrate that VERITAS effectively defends against data poisoning attacks and significantly improves downstream graph learning utility under rigorous privacy guarantees.

Graph-structured data is increasingly generated and stored in decentralized environments, such as social platforms, mobile applications, and edge networks, where users maintain control over their local graph data. However, collecting and analyzing such decentralized graph data for downstream learning tasks raises significant privacy concerns, as nodes and their attributes often contain sensitive personal information. Local Differential Privacy (LDP) has emerged as a promising solution for privacy-preserving data collection without relying on trusted servers. Nevertheless, existing LDP-based graph learning methods typically assume uniform privacy requirements across users, ignoring the heterogeneous and personalized privacy preferences commonly observed in real-world systems. This uniform treatment leads to inflexible noise injection at the data collection stage, resulting in substantial distortion of graph data and degraded utility in subsequent analysis. To address this limitation, we propose PPGNN, a personalized differentially private framework for decentralized graph data. PPGNN enables user-specific privacy budgets during local perturbation while preserving analytical utility. To handle heterogeneous privacy levels and noise distortion, we design a two-stage solution consisting of a Personalized Perturbation Mechanism (PPM) and a weighted calibration strategy, FlexProp. Extensive experiments on six real-world graph datasets demonstrate that PPGNN effectively balances personalized privacy protection and data utility in decentralized graph learning scenarios.

Large language models (LLMs) have recently advanced graph neural networks (GNNs) by enriching node representations with semantic information, giving rise to LLM-enhanced GNNs that achieve substantial performance gains. However, how such semantic enhancement affects privacy risks remains largely underexplored. To bridge this gap, we systematically audit the privacy risks of LLM-enhanced GNNs through a unified framework consisting of five stages: (1) dataset preparation, (2) victim model training, (3) privacy attack, (4) risk assessment, and (5) defense analysis. Specifically, our evaluation spans ten text-attributed graph datasets across diverse domains, six privacy attacks, 42 LLM-enhanced GNN configurations, and three more recent language-model backbones. Extensive experiments show that, despite their utility improvements, LLM-enhanced GNNs consistently exhibit greater empirical privacy vulnerability than shallow text representation baselines under the evaluated attacks across diverse models and datasets. Further analysis shows that LLM-enhanced representations exhibit more distinguishable link-, label-, and membership-related signals in the embedding space, making them more exploitable by inference attacks. Finally, we evaluate representative defenses and examine their effectiveness in mitigating these privacy risks. Overall, this work provides a systematic audit of privacy risks in LLM-enhanced GNNs and offers insights for developing more secure and trustworthy graph learning systems.