What Tracks Hard-Negative Transfer? A Study of Lexical and Semantic Signals

Retrieval-augmented language models can fail to respect negative constraints when the retriever supplies evidence about concepts the user explicitly excluded. Beyond explicit negation, queries may ask for answers that include one concept while excluding another, or for entities that belong to a category but differ from a closely related instance. Because the excluded concept still appears in the query text, dense retrievers may assign high similarity to documents about that concept even when the user asks to avoid it. We introduce E-SENS, a training-free reranking method for negation-sensitive retrieval. E-SENS extracts a compact trap query for the excluded side and subtracts trap-query similarity from the original-query retrieval score. On ExcluIR, E-SENS shows a clear recall-violation trade-off across four embedding models and reduces trap retrieval at recall-preserving settings.

Hard negative mining has become the dominant strategy for training retrievers, yet it faces intrinsic limitations: negatives are bounded by corpus availability, selected by retriever score rather than diagnostic value, and increasingly contaminated by false positives as the retriever improves. LLM-based synthesis offers a principled alternative, where negatives that are unconstrained, targeted, and free from false positive risk. But we show that naively incorporating generated negatives into contrastive learning often degrades retrieval performance. We identify and formalize the root cause as a generative-discriminative gap: LLM generation optimizes for fluent, plausible text, while contrastive learning demands strategic violations of relevance at the decision boundary. Our analysis reveals two compounding failure modes: discriminative-agnostic generation, where the LLM lacks an explicit model of query information needs and defaults to generic or topic-drifted text that provides no contrastive signal; and source-dependent shortcuts, where distributional artifacts enable the model to distinguish negatives by origin rather than relevance, causing gradient drift that actively corrupts optimization. To close this gap, we propose CausalNeg consisting of two main modules: (1) CoT-guided counterfactual perturbation for data construction: decomposes why a document satisfies a query into explicit information requirements, then surgically violates individual requirements to construct negatives with controlled, interpretable hardness. (2) Query-view entropy maximization during training: disperses generated negatives across the similarity spectrum, minimizing the mutual information between source identity and similarity scores to suppress shortcut exploitation. We make our code publicly available at https://github.com/mzhangzhicheng/CausalNeg.

Instruction-following information retrieval (IFIR) requires retrievers to rank documents by both a query and its instance-specific instructions, yet instruction-conditioned contrastive supervision remains scarce. Existing synthetic methods typically fix a positive passage and generate additional negatives, overlooking the hard-negative potential of the original positive. We propose Natural Hard-Negative Mining (NHNM), which promotes convertible negatives under query-compatible instructions and repurposes original positives as natural instruction hard negatives. Its automated Candidate Cleaning, Reversal Construction, and Geometry Filtering pipeline produces compact, high-contrast supervision aligned with the pretrained retrieval space. Applied to MSMARCO, NHNM yields NHNM-MARCO, an IFIR training set of nearly 7K instances. On InstructIR and FollowIR, models with 568M to 4B parameters fine-tuned on NHNM-MARCO achieve strong instruction-following performance and match or surpass substantially larger retrievers in several settings. Controlled analyses and ablations attribute these gains to natural hard-negative supervision rather than model scale or training-data volume.