Triangulating Temporal Dynamics in Multilingual Swiss Online News

Today most media content is consumed based on algorithmic recommendations. Evidence suggests that this can lead to politically biased media consumption patterns. Automated extraction of political agendas from texts can reveal and analyze political biases in online media -- and thus help fostering politically unbiased media consumption. Here we employ modern political text analysis methods demonstrating the potential of automated fine-grained political bias analysis in online media. We conduct an analysis of political content in German language online media during the period 2019--2022, encompassing several million articles and tweets covering events with profound societal impact globally and nationally, the COVID-19 pandemic and the beginning of the war in Ukraine. Our analysis identifies thematic similarity between national (German and Swiss) reporting, particularly for categories driven by international events. We also find divergences emerging in domestically influenced categories, reflecting differences in national policies and institutional structures. A comparison of newspaper and Twitter discourse reveals that both media converge around a shared core during the pandemic, yet differ in intensity and temporal dynamics. Newspapers exhibit more stable political content, while Twitter reacts through short-lived event-driven spikes. These findings indicate that international crises act as a powerful synchronizing force on political content in classical media, temporarily overriding both national and media-form differences. Our automated political analysis empowers citizens by rendering political agendas in online media transparent. This transparency also enables media outlets to bridge the gap between algorithm-driven echo chambers and a more informed, balanced public discourse.

Policymakers enact and revise privacy laws expecting meaningful benefits for their people in practice. While scholarship has measured the real-world impact of some privacy regulations-the EU and California most notably-limited empirical evidence exists for many of the more than 140 countries that have implemented some form of privacy legislation. Switzerland, a multilingual country bordered almost entirely by EU states, is one such example. This paper analyzes the extent to which a 2023 alignment of Swiss privacy law with EU privacy regulation affected website privacy policies in Switzerland. To address Switzerland's unique multilingual culture, we develop an LLM-based pipeline that extracts legally relevant information as document-level labels in a single inference without requiring translation. On a benchmark of 120 expert-annotated privacy policies in German, French, Italian, and English, our pipeline achieves F1 scores above 0.90 for most pairs of languages and legally relevant disclosures. Applying this pipeline to privacy policies we collected from more than 35,000 Swiss- and EU-facing websites before and after the 2023 privacy law revision, we find significant increases in both mandatory and voluntary disclosures of data subject rights among Swiss privacy policies. In exploring the mechanisms driving increased disclosure rates, we discover heavy use of automated privacy policy generators and find that generated policies are associated with up to 15 percentage points higher disclosure rates. These results provide large-scale empirical evidence of how regulatory change and novel drafting technologies impact the content of privacy policies in a unique multilingual environment.

We present Swiss4Arg, a multilingual dataset for argument mining based on official Swiss voting brochures, covering all four national languages: German, French, Italian, and Romansh (a Romance minority language exclusively spoken in Switzerland). The brochures contain explicitly formulated arguments systematically organized into pro and con sections, resulting in a cross-lingually aligned resource with balanced argumentative stance. We create a dataset that comprises 53 federal voting issues collected between 2019 and 2025, annotated for argument components (major claims, claims, premises, and non-argumentative units) and relations (support and attack) by three native speakers per language. Inter-annotator agreement (Krippendorff's alpha) reaches 0.548 for component classification and 0.623 for relation and target classification, computed jointly across all annotators on the parallel data. We release both adjudicated labels and individual annotator annotations, enabling analyses of disagreement and cross-linguistic variation, and provide baseline results using GPT-5.4 and SwissBERT. Swiss4Arg establishes a novel benchmark for multilingual argument mining, with a particular focus on cross-lingual comparability and low-resource settings such as Romansh. The dataset and code are publicly available at https://anonymous-hf.up.railway.app/a/gozw0nion72y/ (HuggingFace) and https://anonymous.4open.science/r/MultiVote-03BD/ (GitHub).