cs.CLMar 24, 2026

Who Spoke What When? Evaluating Spoken Language Models for Conversational ASR with Semantic and Overlap-Aware Metrics

Authors: Naohiro Tawara, Samuele Cornell, Alexander Polok, Marc Delcroix, Lukáš Burget, Shinji Watanabe

Organizations: NTT, Inc., Japan · CMU, USA · BUT, Czechia

Abstract

Conversational automatic speech recognition remains challenging due to overlapping speech, far-field noise, and varying speaker counts. While recent LLM-based systems perform well on single-speaker benchmarks, their robustness in multi-speaker settings is unclear. We systematically compare LLM-based and modular pipeline approaches along four axes: overlap robustness, semantic fidelity, speaker count, and single- versus multi-channel input. To capture meaning-altering errors that conventional metrics miss, we introduce tcpSemER, which extends tcpWER by replacing Levenshtein distance with embedding-based semantic similarity. We further decompose tcpWER into overlapping and non-overlapping components for finer-grained analysis. Experiments across three datasets show that LLM-based systems are competitive in two-speaker settings but degrade as speaker count and overlap increase, whereas modular pipelines remain more robust.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

Sep 1, 2026

Soft Posterior Speaker Injection for Multi-Talker Speech Recognition

Multi-talker automatic speech recognition (MT-ASR) remains challenging in the presence of overlapping speech. Hard segmentation introduces irreversible errors, whereas serialized output training (SOT) avoids explicit segmentation but does not condition a pretrained encoder on speaker activity. We propose Soft Posterior Speaker Injection (SPSI). A Soft Posterior Head predicts per-frame speaker posteriors P^\hat{\mathbf{P}} and injects them into Whisper through Multi-layer Feature-wise Linear Modulation (MFLM) and Speaker Memory Prompts (SMP). The benefit of SPSI is largest where overlap is heaviest and under domain transfer. On controlled two-speaker LibriSpeech overlap, SPSI reduces concatenated minimum-permutation word error rate (cpWER) from 61.5%61.5\% to 60.0%60.0\% in the high-overlap bin, and from 51.9%51.9\% to 51.0%51.0\% on the full set, relative to SOT. By contrast, Speaker CE, SD-CTC, SA-DiCoW, and Pipeline (oracle/est.\ VAD) do not outperform SOT. Freeze-posterior overlap-heavy adaptation reduces held-out LibriCSS cpWER from 42.3%42.3\% to 36.8%36.8\% on sessions 88--99, a 5.55.5-point gain over SOT. The source code is available at https://github.com/HackerHyper/SPSI.
Mar 11, 2026

Speaker Verification with Speech-Aware LLMs: Evaluation and Augmentation

Speech-aware large language models (LLMs) can accept speech inputs, yet their training objectives largely emphasize linguistic content or specific fields such as emotions or the speaker's gender, leaving it unclear whether they encode speaker identity. First, we propose a model-agnostic scoring protocol that produces continuous verification scores for both API-only and open-weight models, using confidence scores or log-likelihood ratios from the Yes/No token probabilities. Using this protocol, we benchmark recent speech-aware LLMs and observe weak speaker discrimination (EERs above 20% on VoxCeleb1). Second, we introduce a lightweight augmentation that equips an LLM with ASV capability by injecting frozen ECAPA-TDNN speaker embeddings through a learned projection and training only LoRA adapters. On TinyLLaMA-1.1B, the resulting ECAPA-LLM achieves 1.03% EER on VoxCeleb1-E, approaching a dedicated speaker verification system while preserving a natural-language interface.
Jun 15, 2026

Are you speaking my languages? On spoken language adherence in multimodal LLMs

While Large Language Model (LLM) based Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) enables seamless multilingual use, models often misidentify the output language, compromising transcription fidelity and downstream application quality. To preserve flexibility and code-switching capabilities, we propose a soft prompting approach that hints at potential spoken languages without strictly constraining the output. We formally define this challenge as a lack of language adherence, introduce a novel metric to quantify violations, and evaluate three mitigation strategies: (1) zero-shot prompting for robust guidance under uncertainty, (2) supervised fine-tuning (SFT) to improve prompt adherence, and (3) Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning to enforce adherence during decoding. We present a comparative analysis of these methods across multiple languages, evaluating effectiveness in reducing the language violation while maintaining overall ASR performance. Finally, we discuss trade-offs to guide strategy selection under various compute constraints.