Gau-Occ: Geometry-Completed Gaussians for Multi-Modal 3D Occupancy Prediction
Authors: Chengxin Lv, Yihui Li, Hongyu Yang, YunHong Wang
Organizations: State Key Laboratory of Virtual Reality Technology and Systems, Beihang University, Beijing, China · School of Computer Science and Engineering, Beihang University, Beijing, China · School of Artificial Intelligence, Beihang University, Beijing, China
3D semantic occupancy prediction is crucial for autonomous driving. While multi-modal fusion improves accuracy over vision-only methods, it typically relies on computationally expensive dense voxel or BEV tensors. We present Gau-Occ, a multi-modal framework that bypasses dense volumetric processing by modeling the scene as a compact collection of semantic 3D Gaussians. To ensure geometric completeness, we propose a LiDAR Completion Diffuser (LCD) that recovers missing structures from sparse LiDAR to initialize robust Gaussian anchors. Furthermore, we introduce Gaussian Anchor Fusion (GAF), which efficiently integrates multi-view image semantics via geometry-aligned 2D sampling and cross-modal alignment. By refining these compact Gaussian descriptors, Gau-Occ captures both spatial consistency and semantic discriminability. Extensive experiments across challenging benchmarks demonstrate that Gau-Occ achieves state-of-the-art performance with significant computational efficiency.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Overview of Gau-Occ . Sparse LiDAR scans are first completed by a pretrained LiDAR Completion Diffuser (LCD) to recover occluded geometry. The completed points are encoded into geometric features to initialize density-aware semantic 3D Gaussians. Each Gaussian then anchors multi-view image features via our Gaussian Anchor Fusion (GAF) , producing geometry-aligned multi-modal representations. The refined Gaussians are finally splatted into voxel space for semantic occupancy prediction.
Figure 2: Hybrid Gaussian initialization. Left: raw sparse LiDAR input. Middle: completed point cloud P′ from LCD. Right: initialized Gaussian centers derived from P′ , with density-based subset Pd (red) and random subset Pr (green).
Figure 3: Schematic of geometry-aware image token resampling and modulation.
Method
Modality
IoU ↑
mIoU ↑
barrier
bicycle
bus
car
const. veh.
motorcycle
pedestrian
traffic cone
trailer
truck
drive. surf.
other flat
sidewalk
terrain
manmade
vegetation
MonoScene [ 3 ]
C
24.0
7.3
4.0
0.4
8.0
8.0
2.9
0.3
1.2
0.7
4.0
4.4
27.7
5.2
15.1
11.3
9.0
14.9
C-CONet [ 46 ]
C
26.1
18.4
18.6
10.0
26.4
27.4
8.6
15.7
13.3
9.7
10.9
20.2
33.0
20.7
21.4
21.8
14.7
21.3
GaussianFormer [ 16 ]
C
29.8
19.1
19.5
11.3
26.1
29.8
10.5
13.8
12.6
8.7
12.7
21.6
39.6
23.3
24.5
23.0
9.6
19.1
BEVFormer [ 28 ]
C
30.5
16.8
14.2
6.6
23.5
28.3
8.7
10.8
6.6
4.1
11.2
17.8
37.3
18.0
22.9
22.2
13.8
22.2
TPVFormer [ 15 ]
C
30.9
17.1
16.0
5.3
23.9
27.3
9.8
8.7
7.1
5.2
11.0
19.2
38.9
21.3
24.3
23.2
11.7
20.8
Table 1: Quantitative comparison on SurroundOcc-nuScenes validation set. The best results are in bold , second best are underlined .
Method
mIoU ↑
Modality
others
barrier
bicycle
bus
car
const. veh.
motorcycle
pedestrian
traffic cone
trailer
truck
drive. surf.
other flat
sidewalk
terrain
manmade
vegetation
BEVDetOcc [ 12 ]
42.0
C
12.2
49.6
25.1
52.0
54.5
27.9
28.0
28.9
27.2
36.4
42.2
82.3
43.3
54.6
57.9
48.6
43.6
PanoOcc [ 47 ]
42.1
C
11.7
50.5
29.4
49.4
55.5
24.3
33.3
30.6
31.0
34.4
42.6
83.3
44.2
54.4
56.0
45.9
40.4
FB-OCC [ 29 ]
48.9
C
14.3
57.0
38.3
57.7
62.1
34.4
39.4
38.8
39.4
42.9
50.0
86.0
50.2
60.1
62.5
52.4
45.7
FlashOcc [ 53 ]
43.5
C
13.4
51.8
32.1
54.1
58.3
29.9
32.8
31.9
29.9
38.7
46.2
85.0
47.4
56.2
59.6
50.0
43.7
COTR [ 33 ]
46.2
C
14.9
53.3
35.2
50.8
57.4
34.1
33.5
31.9
33.1
39.1
45.0
84.5
48.3
57.6
61.1
51.6
46.7
Table 2: Quantitative comparison on Occ3D-nuScenes validation set. The best results are in bold , second best are underlined .
Figure 4: Qualitative results on the SurroundOcc-nuScenes validation set. Top: multi-view images (left), LiDAR input (center), and predicted image-view occupancy (right). Bottom: predicted 3D Gaussians, BEV occupancy, and front-view occupancy.
Figure 5: Qualitative results on the Occ3D-nuScenes validation set. Top: predicted occupancy. Bottom: ground-truth.
Figure 6: Qualitative comparison between Gaussianformer-2 [ 14 ] , DAOcc [ 52 ] and Gau-Occ on the SurroundOcc-nuScenes validation set.
Table 3: Ablation on the SurroundOcc-nuScenes validation set.
Figure 7: Visualization of ablations on Gaussian initialization.
Figure 8: Visualization of ablations on GAF components.
Method
Modality
Query
Lat.
Mem.
IoU ↑
mIoU ↑
Number
(ms)
(GB)
BEVFormer [ 28 ]
C
200×200
310
4.5
30.5
16.8
TPVFormer [ 15 ]
C
200×200×16
320
5.1
30.9
17.1
SurroundOcc [ 48 ]
C
200×200×16
340
5.9
31.5
16.3
GaussianFormer [ 16 ]
C
25600
195
4.8
28.7
16.0
C
144000
372
6.2
29.8
19.1
Table 4: Comparison of inference efficiency on the nuScenes validation set. All results are measured with a batch size of 1 on a single NVIDIA RTX 4090 GPU.
Method
Modality
IoU ↑
mIoU ↑
car
bicycle
motorcycle
truck
other-vehicle
person
road
parking
sidewalk
other-ground
building
fence
vegetation
terrain
pole
traffic-sign
other-structure
other-object
LMSCNet [ 39 ]
L
47.5
13.7
20.9
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
63.0
13.5
33.5
0.2
43.7
0.3
40.0
26.8
0.0
0.0
3.6
0.0
SSCNet [ 41 ]
L
53.6
17.0
32.0
0.0
0.2
10.3
0.6
0.1
65.7
17.3
41.2
3.2
44.4
6.8
43.7
28.9
0.8
0.8
8.6
0.7
L2COcc-L [ 45 ]
L
57.6
25.2
40.4
4.1
4.2
26.2
10.3
10.0
70.0
22.6
46.2
8.8
51.0
14.3
47.6
31.3
24.9
21.6
14.0
6.4
MonoScene [ 3 ]
C
37.9
12.3
19.3
0.4
0.6
8.0
2.0
0.9
48.4
11.4
28.1
3.2
32.9
3.5
26.2
16.8
6.9
5.7
4.2
3.1
VoxFormer [ 26 ]
C
38.8
11.9
17.8
1.2
0.9
4.6
2.1
1.6
47.0
9.7
27.2
2.8
31.2
5.0
29.0
14.7
6.5
6.9
3.8
2.4
Table 5: Quantitative comparison on the KITTI-360 validation set. The best results are in bold , second best are underlined .
Figure 9: Qualitative results on KITTI-360.
Figure 10: Additional qualitative results on the SurroundOcc-nuScenes validation set under adverse weather scenarios. Top shows multi-view images (left), raw LiDAR input (center), and predicted image-view occupancy (right); Bottom presents predicted 3D Gaussians, BEV occupancy, and front-view occupancy.
Figure 11: Additional qualitative results on the Occ3D-nuScenes validation set under adverse weather scenarios. Top-left : multi-view images; top-right : predicted image-view occupancy; bottom-left : predicted 3D Gaussians; bottom-right : front-view occupancy; inset: LiDAR input.
Figure 12: Additional qualitative results on the SurroundOcc-nuScenes validation set under dense traffic scenarios.
Figure 13: Additional qualitative results on the Occ3D-nuScenes validation set under dense traffic scenarios.
This paper introduces VLMFusionOcc3D, a robust multimodal framework for dense 3D semantic occupancy prediction in autonomous driving. Current voxel-based occupancy models often struggle with semantic ambiguity in sparse geometric grids and performance degradation under adverse weather conditions. To address these challenges, we leverage the rich linguistic priors of Vision-Language Models (VLMs) to anchor ambiguous voxel features to stable semantic concepts. Our framework initiates with a dual-branch feature extraction pipeline that projects multi-view images and LiDAR point clouds into a unified voxel space. We propose Instance-driven VLM Attention (InstVLM), which utilizes gated cross-attention and LoRA-adapted CLIP embeddings to inject high-level semantic and geographic priors directly into the 3D voxels. Furthermore, we introduce Weather-Aware Adaptive Fusion (WeathFusion), a dynamic gating mechanism that utilizes vehicle metadata and weather-conditioned prompts to re-weight sensor contributions based on real-time environmental reliability. To ensure structural consistency, a Depth-Aware Geometric Alignment (DAGA) loss is employed to align dense camera-derived geometry with sparse, spatially accurate LiDAR returns. Extensive experiments on the nuScenes and SemanticKITTI datasets demonstrate that our plug-and-play modules consistently enhance the performance of state-of-the-art voxel-based baselines. Notably, our approach achieves significant improvements in challenging weather scenarios, offering a scalable and robust solution for complex urban navigation.
Vision-based 3D semantic occupancy prediction is essential for autonomous driving, yet dense voxel representations waste computation on largely empty space, while BEV and TPV projections compromise fine-grained 3D structure. Fully sparse representations offer an attractive alternative, but existing methods, including SparseOcc, entangle scene completion with semantic prediction by indiscriminately propagating high-dimensional features into empty regions and applying voxel-wise classification. This creates excessive activations, computational overhead, and geometric ambiguity. We present SparseOcc++, a geometry-aware sparse framework that explicitly decouples scene completion from semantic segmentation. SparseOcc++ reformulates completion as signed-distance regression on sparse anchor voxels through a scene completion field (SCF). To model complex outdoor geometry robustly, it combines orthogonal decomposition with discretized distance learning. A geometry-guided propagation module then converts the SCF into a complete volumetric scene and restricts semantic segmentation to geometrically verified regions. Experiments establish new state of the art: SparseOcc++ improves IoU by 2.3 points and is 3.9x faster than SparseOcc on nuScenes, while achieving a 5.9x speedup over OccFormer on SemanticKITTI.
Pin Tang, Zhongdao Wang, Guoqing Wang +2
MoE Key Lab of Artificial Intelligence, AI Institute, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China · Huawei Noah’s Ark Lab, China
Vision-only occupancy prediction requires recovering a semantic 3D occupancy field from calibrated surround-view images, where each view provides observations with ambiguous depth along camera rays. Existing methods have progressed from dense structured representations to sparse Gaussian primitives, improving the efficiency of 3D scene representation. However, Gaussian learning still relies primarily on image domain features, which provide limited explicit geometric information for volumetric reasoning. Our key observation is that effective Gaussian occupancy modeling requires not only sparse primitives, but also richer geometric and semantic learning cues. In this paper, we propose VGOcc, which learns visual and geometric cues from foundation models for Gaussian modeling. VGOcc incorporates these cues into primitive initialization and refinement, yielding a representation termed Visual-Geometric Gaussians tailored to semantic occupancy prediction. Specifically, we propose Visual-Geometric Gaussian Birth to form spatially balanced Gaussian centers from ray depth hypotheses, while visual semantic features initialize primitive attributes. Next, we design Pose-Aware Feature Learning to combine foundation tokens with camera embeddings and calibrated ray information. Features from neighboring views are then aggregated at projected 3D locations for each Gaussian refinement stage. Finally, Gaussian decoder refines birth Gaussians with pose-aware features and renders them into semantic occupancy. Experiments on nuScenes demonstrate that VGOcc achieves state-of-the-art performance in vision-only 3D occupancy prediction. Codes will be available at https://github.com/JHLin42in/VGOcc.
Junhong Lin, Xianda Guo, Kangli Wang +4
1SECE, Peking University · School of Computer Science, Wuhan University · 3Great Wall Motor