Parametric Knowledge in RAG-SFT for Domain-Specific Document Generation

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) mitigates knowledge obsolescence and factual hallucination in large language models by introducing external context. However, when retrieved knowledge conflicts with the model's internal parametric knowledge, the model may either blindly follow misleading context or incorrectly rely on parametric knowledge, leading to unreliable responses. To address this issue, this paper proposes TRACE (Debate-TRace and Answer-Completeness rEgularized fine-tuning), a robust fine-tuning framework for RAG under knowledge conflicts. First, we propose a fine-tuning method that leverages multi-agent debate traces to extract correct candidates, incorrect candidates, and answer-shift patterns, providing fine-grained supervision for reliable knowledge-source selection. In addition, we design an answer completeness regularization mechanism to alleviate empty, overly short, and prematurely terminated responses via answer-tail token reinforcement and premature termination suppression. The fine-tuning objective combines correct-answer supervision, incorrect-candidate suppression, answer-tail token reinforcement, and premature termination suppression, enabling the model to use reliable external context, resist misleading or irrelevant retrieved content, and fall back to parametric knowledge when retrieved evidence is unreliable. Experiments across multiple knowledge-conflict scenarios and datasets show that TRACE improves robustness against misleading retrieved knowledge and reduces incomplete answers. These results demonstrate that multi-agent debate traces and answer completeness regularization jointly enhance knowledge-source selection, conflict robustness, and answer quality in RAG models. Our code is available at https://github.com/PHD-lanyu/TRACE.

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) equips large language models with external knowledge and is central to knowledge-intensive tasks. As RAG systems enter real-world use, generators must reliably leverage retrieved evidence. Recent fine-tuning methods improve adaptation to RAG scenarios, but optimization remains challenging because retrieval may return incomplete, fragmented, noisy, or conflicting contexts. Complex tasks further require fine-grained evidence dependencies. These challenges make high-quality supervision costly and limit generalization. We present KARE-RAG (Knowledge-Aware Refinement and Enhancement for RAG), a training-time scaffolded alignment framework. It uses structured knowledge representations as temporary scaffolds to expose evidence organization, support localized factual refinement, and construct fine-grained preference pairs. In our main implementation, an expert LLM refines a lightweight graph-structured evidence sketch. The generator is optimized with token-weighted Dense Direct Preference Optimization (DDPO), which focuses learning on edited scaffold regions. Scaffolds are used only for data construction and training supervision. At inference time, the model runs as standard Vanilla RAG without graph construction, extra retrieval, or latency overhead. Experiments show that KARE improves transfer across the evaluated QA and relation extraction datasets with limited training data, while leaving general capabilities largely unchanged. KARE can also complement existing RAG training objectives as an additional alignment stage.

Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) grounds large language models in external sources, but retrieved passages often name the right entities without providing the facts needed to answer. Even when instructed to abstain, 12 generators answer 40.0-99.3% of insufficient-evidence questions. Training generators to abstain ties the decision to model weights, may reward answers recalled from parametric knowledge, and still requires a full generator call. Can sufficiency be judged from the question and evidence alone, before any answer exists? We identify pitfalls in constructing insufficient-evidence tests: removing relevant evidence or pairing evidence with unrelated questions can reveal labels through lexical overlap or evidence position. We build a paired benchmark using substitution, deletion, and question-swap constructions that vary answer support while controlling selected surface features, such as word use. Sufficiency can be judged without generating an answer, but no single signal works across all datasets. We introduce RINSE (Relevance Is Not Sufficient Evidence), which combines three signals: whether every part of the question is covered, whether any passage offers an answer, and whether a small language model reading the passages together judges them sufficient. Across six datasets, RINSE ranks sufficient above insufficient evidence with a score of 0.837 (chance 0.5), exceeding the best of 10 prior methods (0.746) and a frontier model queried through an API (0.784). Its weakest dataset scores higher than any other method's weakest (0.684 vs. 0.676). RINSE runs locally before generation, taking 36.5 ms per question on a single GPU.