PoiCGAN: A Targeted Poisoning Based on Feature-Label Joint Perturbation in Federated Learning

In a federated learning setup for GANs, several adversarial attacks are possible. One such attack is label flipping, in which malicious clients deliberately alter label information during local training in order to manipulate the global generator. The objective of this attack is to skew the learned generation distribution so that samples conditioned on a target label are instead mapped to a source class. In this work, we investigate the effectiveness of label flipping attacks in federated GANs through both theoretical analysis and empirical evaluation. We further consider an oversampling based variant, in which malicious clients upweight poisoned samples during local training to amplify their influence on the aggregated global model. We quantify the resulting distributional shift by computing the Kullback Leibler divergence between the clean and poisoned class conditional distributions, and show both analytically and on FEMNIST, MNIST, and CIFAR10 that the semantic damage of the attack grows linearly in the effective poisoning strength while deviation from the true target distribution grows only quadratically, making the attack effective yet difficult to detect from label agnostic metrics.

Model poisoning attacks pose a significant security threat to Federated Learning (FL). Most existing model poisoning attacks rely on collusion, requiring adversarial clients to coordinate by exchanging local benign models and synchronizing the generation of their poisoned updates. However, sustaining such coordination is increasingly impractical in real-world FL deployments, as it effectively requires botnet-like control over many devices. This approach is costly to maintain and highly vulnerable to detection. This context raises a fundamental question: Can model poisoning attacks remain effective without any communication between attackers? To address this challenge, we introduce and formalize the non-collusive attack model, in which all compromised clients share a common adversarial objective but operate independently. Under this model, each attacker generates its malicious update without communicating with other adversaries, accessing other clients' updates, or relying on any knowledge of server-side defenses. To demonstrate the feasibility of this threat model, we propose XFED, the first aggregation-agnostic, non-collusive model poisoning attack. Our empirical evaluation across six benchmark datasets shows that XFED bypasses eight state-of-the-art defenses and outperforms six existing model poisoning attacks. These findings indicate that FL systems are substantially less secure than previously believed and underscore the urgent need for more robust and practical defense mechanisms.

Data poisoning attacks pose serious security threats to Federated Learning (FL) systems in Computer Vision. Despite growing research attention, two key challenges remain for existing defense techniques: (1) accurately distinguishing between benign and malicious model updates and (2) effectively mitigating the influence of poisoned model updates during model aggregation. To address these challenges, we propose a novel defense framework against targeted poisoning attacks with Spatial-Temporal Analysis and Robust aggregation for FL (STAR-FL). First, we employ spatial-temporal clustering to identify and remove potentially malicious updates from the FL training process. Second, we adjust the learning rate during aggregation to mitigate the impact of any malicious updates that evade detection. Third, we conduct extensive experiments across multiple benchmark datasets to evaluate the spatial-temporal analysis and robust aggregation in STAR-FL. Experimental results demonstrate their synergistic effect in enabling STAR-FL to effectively protect FL and consistently outperform state-of-the-art defenses against targeted poisoning attacks, significantly reducing Attack Success Rates (ASRs). The source code is available at https://github.com/mlsysx/STAR-FL.