Organizations: ETIS (UMR 8051), CY Cergy Paris Univ., ENSEA, CNRS, France · Computer Engineering Dept, Sana’a Community College, Yemen · VSC Laboratory, Department of Electronics and Automation, University of Biskra, Algeria · Dept. of CS & AI, Univ. of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Spain · CNR-ISASI "E. Caianiello", Lecce, Italy
Islamic inheritance (Ilm al-Mawarith) is a multi-stage legal reasoning task requiring the identification of eligible heirs, resolution of blocking rules (hajb), assignment of fixed and residual shares, handling of adjustments such as awl and radd, and generation of a consistent final distribution. The task is further complicated by variations across legal schools and civil-law codifications, requiring models to operate under explicit legal configurations. We present a retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) pipeline for this setting, combining rule-grounded synthetic data generation, hybrid retrieval (dense and BM25) with cross-encoder reranking, and schema-constrained output validation. A symbolic inheritance calculator is used to generate a large high-quality synthetic corpus with full intermediate reasoning traces, ensuring legal and numerical consistency. The proposed system achieves a MIR-E score of 0.935 and ranks first on the official QIAS 2026 blind-test leaderboard. Results demonstrate that retrieval-grounded, schema-aware generation significantly improves reliability in high-precision Arabic legal reasoning tasks.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: Overview of the proposed RAG pipeline for QIAS.
Category
Train
Dev
Diff
Simple
5,531 (93.8%)
125 (62.5%)
-31.3%
‘Awl
288 (4.9%)
4 (2.0%)
-2.9%
Radd
81 (1.4%)
71 (35.5%)
+34.1%
Total
5,900
200
–
Table 1: QIAS 2026 dataset distribution showing train–dev imbalance.
Model
MIR-E
Missing
Qwen 3.5 9B
0.347
19
Qwen2.5-7B
0.243
0
Command-R7B
0.225
32
Llama3.2-1B
0.109
80
Gemma3-12B
0.010
193
Table 2: Off-the-shelf benchmarking on the 200-case QIAS dev set.
Rank
Team
MIR-E
1
CVPD (ours)
0.935
2
Simplicity Almansour (2026)
0.931
3
KMS Alkhamis (2026)
0.916
4
QU-NLP *
0.907
5
PSL Mouhoub (2026)
0.898
6
grkurdi *
0.826
Table 3: Official QIAS 2026 blind-test leaderboard. Teams marked with * did not have published system descriptions at the time of writing.
Source
Combined
Semantic
Keyword
PDF-only
0.718
0.879
0.235
PDF+Web
0.591
0.746
0.229
Web-only
0.463
0.593
0.269
Table 4: Source ablation on the 200-question QIAS dev set.