ScrollScape: Unlocking 32K Image Generation With Video Diffusion Priors
Organizations: Harbin Institute of Technology · Li Auto, Beijing, China
Abstract
While diffusion models excel at generating images with conventional dimensions, pushing them to synthesize ultra-high-resolution imagery at extreme aspect ratios (EAR) often triggers catastrophic structural failures, such as object repetition and spatial fragmentation. This limitation fundamentally stems from a lack of robust spatial priors, as static text-to-image models are primarily trained on image distributions with conventional dimensions. To overcome this bottleneck, we present ScrollScape, a novel framework that reformulates EAR image synthesis into a continuous video generation process through two core innovations. By mapping the spatial expansion of a massive canvas to the temporal evolution of video frames, ScrollScape leverages the inherent temporal consistency of video models as a powerful global constraint to ensure long-range structural integrity. Specifically, Scanning Positional Encoding (ScanPE) distributes global coordinates across frames to act as a flexible moving camera, while Scrolling Super-Resolution (ScrollSR) leverages video super-resolution priors to circumvent memory bottlenecks, efficiently scaling outputs to an unprecedented 32K resolution. Fine-tuned on a curated 3K multi-ratio image dataset, ScrollScape effectively aligns pre-trained video priors with the EAR generation task. Extensive evaluations demonstrate that it significantly outperforms existing image-diffusion baselines by eliminating severe localized artifacts. Consequently, our method overcomes inherent structural bottlenecks to ensure exceptional global coherence and visual fidelity across diverse domains at extreme scales.
Figures & tables
| Method | FID | CLIP | KID | Style-L | GSD (LPIPS) | GSD (DINOv2) |
| FLUX-Krea | 333.7 | 20.9 | 20.4 | 6.0 | 0.174 | 0.822 |
| FLUX-Krea+Fill | 281.4 | 19.1 | 4.9 | 13.5 | 0.293 | 0.841 |
| DyPE | 248.1 | 24.6 | 4.7 | 5.5 | 0.569 | 0.682 |
| MultiDiffusion | 261.7 | 29.7 | 3.7 | 5.0 | 0.658 | 0.902 |
| SyncDiffusion | 245.2 | 26.5 | 3.2 | 4.7 | 0.618 | 0.895 |
| Tiled Diffusion | 241.2 | 27.3 | 3.0 | 4.5 | 0.591 | 0.901 |
| Method Comparison | Structural Coh. | Content Rich. | Image Qual. |
| Ours vs DyPE | 92% | 89% | 87% |
| Ours vs MultiDiffusion | 83% | 76% | 82% |
| Ours vs SyncDiffusion | 85% | 74% | 78% |
| Ours vs Tiled Diffusion | 76% | 85% | 74% |
| Method | FID | CLIP | KID | Style-L | GSD (LPIPS) | GSD (DINOv2) |
| Wan2.1 | 246.5 | 25.9 | 4.7 | 2.0 | 0.303 | 0.975 |
| w/o Training | 272.0 | 24.6 | 6.3 | 7.6 | 0.569 | 0.858 |
| w/o TAP | 231.6 | 25.6 | 3.2 | 6.0 | 0.469 | 0.730 |
| w/o ScrollSR | 218.8 | 26.5 | 2.4 | 4.9 | 0.668 | 0.671 |
| ScrollScape (Ours) | 214.7 | 30.0 | 2.0 | 4.0 | 0.674 | 0.670 |
Image Generation
Image generation studies models that create or edit images from text, examples, layouts, and other structured controls.
See all 463 papers