Cost-Sensitive Neighborhood Aggregation for Heterophilous Graphs: When Does Per-Edge Routing Help?

Many real-world heterogeneous graphs exhibit pronounced heterophily, where connected nodes often have dissimilar labels or play different semantic roles. In such settings, standard heterogeneous graph neural networks that aggregate messages along metapaths or meta-relations primarily based on feature similarity can propagate misleading information, since feature similarity may be misaligned with underlying relational semantics. In this paper, we propose HeterSEED, a semantics-structure decoupling framework for heterogeneous graph learning under heterophily. HeterSEED decouples representation learning into a heterogeneous semantic channel that captures type- and relation-aware local semantics and a structure-aware heterophily channel that separates homophilic and heterophilic neighborhoods via pseudo-label-guided partitioning and aggregates them using metapath-based structural weights. A node-level adaptive fusion mechanism then combines the two channels to produce context-dependent node representations. Theoretically, we establish that, on heterogeneous graphs under heterophily, HeterSEED is strictly more expressive than standard heterogeneous graph neural networks that rely primarily on feature similarity and provably reduces the prediction bias introduced by heterophilic neighbors. Experiments on five real-world heterogeneous graphs, including two large-scale networks at the million-node and hundred-million-edge scale, demonstrate that HeterSEED consistently outperforms representative heterogeneous graph neural networks and recent heterophily-aware baselines, especially in strongly heterophilic regimes.

Are heterophilic nodes in a graph harder to classify because they are heterophilic or because they are rare? Some existing work frames classification of such nodes as a subgroup generalisation problem, where a model performs well on the majority group at the expense of the rare group. Others explain this as a problem of neighbourhood aggregation in graph neural networks (GNNs). We assess these two viewpoints through a detailed evaluation of six GNNs on five datasets of varying homophily, and find that homophilic nodes tend to be easier to classify, even when they are rare---challenging the subgroup framing. However, our findings also nuance existing beliefs about how GNNs misrepresent heterophilic nodes. We demonstrate that the information needed to classify heterophilic nodes correctly is often recoverable by retraining the classification head of a model, or even just the final linear classification layer.

Over the past decade, Graph Neural Networks (GNNs) have achieved great success on machine learning tasks with relational data. However, recent studies have found that heterophily can cause significant performance degradation of GNNs, especially on node-level tasks. Numerous heterophilic benchmark datasets have been put forward to validate the efficacy of heterophily-specific GNNs, and various homophily metrics have been designed to help recognize these challenging datasets. Nevertheless, there still exist multiple pitfalls that severely hinder the proper evaluation of new models and metrics: 1) lack of hyperparameter tuning; 2) insufficient evaluation on the truly challenging heterophilic datasets; 3) missing quantitative evaluation for homophily metrics on synthetic graphs. To overcome these challenges, we first train and fine-tune baseline models on $27$ most widely used benchmark datasets, and categorize them into three distinct groups: malignant, benign and ambiguous heterophilic datasets. We identify malignant and ambiguous heterophily as the truly challenging subsets of tasks, and to our best knowledge, we are the first to propose such taxonomy. Then, we re-evaluate $11$ state-of-the-arts (SOTA) GNNs, covering six popular methods, with fine-tuned hyperparameters on different groups of heterophilic datasets. Based on the model performance, we comprehensively reassess the effectiveness of different methods on heterophily. At last, we evaluate $11$ popular homophily metrics on synthetic graphs with three different graph generation approaches. To overcome the unreliability of observation-based comparison and evaluation, we conduct the first quantitative evaluation and provide detailed analysis.