VLAgeBench: Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models for Zero-Shot Human Age Estimation
Organizations: Department of Computer Science and Engineering, Begum Rokeya University, Rangpur, Rangpur, Bangladesh · EliteLab.AI, Queens, New York, United States · Department of Computer Science, American International University - Bangladesh, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Abstract
Human age estimation from facial images represents a challenging computer vision task with significant applications in biometrics, healthcare, and human-computer interaction. While traditional deep learning approaches require extensive labeled datasets and domain-specific training, recent advances in large vision-language models (LVLMs) offer the potential for zero-shot age estimation. This study presents a comprehensive zero-shot evaluation of state-of-the-art Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) for facial age estimation, a task traditionally dominated by domain-specific convolutional networks and supervised learning. We assess the performance of GPT-4o, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, and LLaMA 3.2 Vision on two benchmark datasets, UTKFace and FG-NET, without any fine-tuning or task-specific adaptation. Using eight evaluation metrics, including MAE, MSE, RMSE, MAPE, MBE, , CCC, and 5-year accuracy, we demonstrate that general-purpose LVLMs can deliver competitive performance in zero-shot settings. Our findings highlight the emergent capabilities of LVLMs for accurate biometric age estimation and position these models as promising tools for real-world applications. Additionally, we highlight performance disparities linked to image quality and demographic subgroups, underscoring the need for fairness-aware multimodal inference. This work introduces a reproducible benchmark and positions LVLMs as promising tools for real-world applications in forensic science, healthcare monitoring, and human-computer interaction. The benchmark focuses on strict zero-shot inference without fine-tuning and highlights remaining challenges related to prompt sensitivity, interpretability, computational cost, and demographic fairness.
Figures & tables
| Dataset | Model | MAE | MSE | RMSE | MAPE | MBE | CCC | ACC. ±5yrs(%) | |
| UTKFace | LLaMA 3.2 Vision | 7.58 | 109.82 | 10.48 | 67.40 | 0.01 | 0.72 | 0.86 | 51.48 |
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 5.28 | 55.13 | 7.43 | 30.28 | 0.34 | 0.86 | 0.93 | 64.14 | |
| GPT-4o | 4.93 | 47.35 | 6.88 | 18.48 | -1.36 | 0.88 | 0.94 | 66.42 | |
| FGNET | LLaMA 3.2 Vision | 4.86 | 47.34 | 6.88 | 2.22×10 9 | -3.66 | 0.71 | 0.87 | 68.02 |
| Claude 3.5 Sonnet | 3.40 | 26.61 | 5.16 | 1.28×10 9 | -1.85 | 0.84 | 0.93 | 80.97 | |
| GPT-4o | 3.73 | 29.42 | 5.42 | 3.44×10 8 | -3.27 | 0.82 | 0.92 | 74.80 |