Automating Domain-Driven Design: Experience with a Prompting Framework

Large language models (LLMs) accelerate software development but often exhibit instability, non-determinism, and weak adherence to development discipline in unconstrained workflows. While test-driven development (TDD) provides a structured Red-Green-Refactor process, existing LLM-based approaches typically use tests as auxiliary inputs rather than enforceable process constraints. We present an AI-native TDD framework that operationalizes classical TDD principles as structured prompt-level and workflow-level governance mechanisms. Extracted principles are formalized in a machine-readable manifesto and distributed across planning, generation, repair, and validation stages within a layered architecture that separates model proposal from deterministic engine authority. The system enforces phase ordering, bounded repair loops, validation gates, and atomic mutation control to improve stability and reproducibility. We describe architecture and discuss encoding software engineering discipline directly into prompt orchestration, which we think offers a promising direction for reliable LLM-assisted development.

The rapid development of AI and LLMs has driven new methods of SDLC, in which a large portion of code, technical, and business documentation is generated automatically. However, since there is no single architectural framework that can provide consistent, repeatable transformations across different representation layers of information systems, such systems remain fragmented in their system representation. This study explores the problem of creating a unified architecture for LLM-oriented applications based on selected architectural frameworks by SMEs. A framework structure is proposed that covers some key types of architectural diagrams and supports a closed cycle of transformations, such as: "Code to Documentation to Code". The key architectural diagrams are split equally between main architectural layers: high-layer (business and domain understanding), middle-layer (system architecture), and low-layer (developer-layer architecture). Each architectural layer still contains some abstraction layers, which make it more flexible and better fit the requirements of design principles and architectural patterns. The conducted experiments demonstrated the stable quality of generated documentation and code when using a structured architectural context in the form of architectural diagrams. The results confirm that the proposed unified architecture metamodel can serve as an effective interface between humans and models, improving the accuracy, stability, and repeatability of LLM generation. However, the selected set of architectural diagrams should be optimised to avoid redundancy between some diagrams, and some diagrams should be updated to represent extra contextual orchestration. This work demonstrates measurable improvements for a new generation of intelligent tools that automate the SDLC and enable a comprehensive architecture compatible with AI-driven development.

Domain modeling plays an essential role in domain-driven design, capturing essential entities and their relationships within a specific domain. Despite advancements in automated domain modeling, the absence of standardized benchmarks has hindered the comparative assessment of existing approaches. This paper introduces a benchmark designed to address this gap. The benchmark combines the 45-record Golden UML Modelset (Verbruggen et al., 2025) on Zenodo, as distributed by the Text2UML project of Calamo, Mecella, and Snoeck (Calamo et al., 2025), with the 8-record reference archive of Chen et al. (Chen et al., 2023a,b), enabling the evaluation of automated domain modeling approaches across different levels of complexity and scale. Given a natural language description, the task is to generate a corresponding domain model. For each description, a reference domain model is provided as ground truth. A metric is used to compare the generated domain model with the corresponding ground-truth model. To demonstrate the utility of the benchmark, we evaluate multiple automated domain modeling approaches, including heuristic rule-based methods and LLM-driven strategies. In accordance with the FAIR4RS recommendations (Chue Hong et al., 2022), the benchmark is provided as a research artifact to encourage reuse and support future research on automated domain modeling.