TED: Training-Free Experience Distillation for Multimodal Reasoning
Authors: Shuozhi Yuan, Jinqing Wang, Zihao Liu, Miaomiao Yuan, Haoran Peng, Jin Zhao, Bingwen Wang, Haoyi Wang
Organizations: China Telecom Digital Intelligence Technology Co.,Ltd., Beijing, China · Institute of Computing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China
Knowledge distillation is typically realized by transferring a teacher model's knowledge into a student's parameters through supervised or reinforcement-based optimization. While effective, such approaches require repeated parameter updates and large-scale training data, limiting their applicability in resource-constrained environments. In this work, we propose TED, a training-free, context-based distillation framework that shifts the update target of distillation from model parameters to an in-context experience injected into the student's prompt. For each input, the student generates multiple reasoning trajectories, while a teacher independently produces its own solution. The teacher then compares the student trajectories with its reasoning and the ground-truth answer, extracting generalized experiences that capture effective reasoning patterns. These experiences are continuously refined and updated over time. A key challenge of context-based distillation is unbounded experience growth and noise accumulation. TED addresses this with an experience compression mechanism that tracks usage statistics and selectively merges, rewrites, or removes low-utility experiences. Experiments on multimodal reasoning benchmarks MathVision and VisualPuzzles show that TED consistently improves performance. On MathVision, TED raises the performance of Qwen3-VL-8B from 0.627 to 0.702, and on VisualPuzzles from 0.517 to 0.561 with just 100 training samples. Under this low-data, no-update setting, TED achieves performance competitive with fully trained parameter-based distillation while reducing training cost by over 5x, demonstrating that meaningful knowledge transfer can be achieved through contextual experience.
Figures & tables
Figure 1. TED reformulates knowledge distillation from parameter updates to contextual experience reuse.
Figure 2. Overview of TED. Our proposed method includes three stages: trajectory generation, experience generation, and experience compression. The student first samples multiple reasoning trajectories, which the teacher critiques against its own reasoning and the ground truth to distill generalized experiences. These experiences are then compressed and injected into the system prompt for iterative, parameter-free improvement.
Figure 3. Overview of the Experience Compression module in TED. When the experience exceeds the context budget, TED estimates each experience’s utility and tracks its usage frequency. The teacher then compresses the experience by merging, rewriting, deleting, or retaining experiences, producing a compact system prompt that preserves high-utility knowledge for efficient, parameter-free iterative improvement.
Method
Train Set
Student
MathVision
Direct
–
Qwen3-VL-8B
0.627
Direct
–
Qwen3-VL-235B
0.746
RAG ( Rubin et al., 2022 )
–
Qwen3-VL-8B
0.639
RAG
–
Qwen3-VL-235B
0.751
Few-shot
–
Qwen3-VL-8B
0.631
Few-shot
–
Qwen3-VL-235B
0.744
Table 1. Results on the MathVision benchmark.
Method
100
500
1000
3000
TED
0.702
0.707
0.710
0.725
Naive-KD
0.629
0.714
0.722
0.764
Table 2. Comparison of different training data size
Method
Train Set
Student
VisualPuzzles
Direct
–
Qwen3-VL-8B
0.517
Direct
–
Qwen3-VL-235B
0.572
Naive-KD
LogicVista
Qwen3-VL-8B
0.566
Naive-KD
LogicVista
Qwen3-VL-235B
0.582
Reflexion ( Shinn et al., 2023 )
LogicVista
Qwen3-VL-8B
0.524
Reflexion
LogicVista
Qwen3-VL-235B
0.574
Table 3. Results on the VisualPuzzles benchmark.
Method
Train Set
Student
Teacher
AIME25
Direct
–
Qwen3-8B
–
0.673
Direct
–
Qwen3-235B
–
0.815
Naive-KD
DAPO-Math
Qwen3-8B
Kimi-K2.5
0.792
Naive-KD
DAPO-Math
Qwen3-235B
Kimi-K2.5
0.861
TED
DAPO-Math
Qwen3-8B
Kimi-K2.5
0.733
TED
DAPO-Math
Qwen3-235B
Kimi-K2.5
0.846
Table 4. Results on the textual AIME25 benchmark.
Method
GPU Hours
Monetary Cost ($)
Reduction
Naive-KD
576
288.0
-
TED
–
12.6
22.9 ×
Table 5. Training cost comparison on MathVerse under the same training budget (100 samples, N=5 ).
Figure 4. Hyperparameter ablation of TED on MathVision. Performance is affected by the number of experience items, the number of sampled trajectories, and the choice of teacher model. TED performs best with a moderate experience size, more diverse trajectories, and stronger teachers.
Method
Train Set
Teacher
MathVision
Direct
–
–
0.627
Successful few-shot
MathVerse
-
0.631
TED
MathVerse
Qwen3-VL-8B
0.656
TED
MathVerse
Kimi-K2.5
0.702
Table 6. Ablation Study of Teacher-Guided Experience
Method
Teacher
MathVision
Direct
–
0.627
TED (Full)
Kimi-K2.5
0.702
TED W/o Compression
Kimi-K2.5
0.594
TED naive cut
Kimi-K2.5
0.648
TED random choose
Kimi-K2.5
0.632
Table 7. Ablation Study of Experience Compression
Experience source
MathVision (Qwen-VL)
AIME25 (Qwen)
Direct
0.627
0.673
MathVerse
0.702
0.686
DAPO-Math
0.692
0.733
Table 8. Cross-modal generalization of experience.
Context distillation transfers information from extra prompts, histories, or teacher guidance into model parameters or compact memories, reducing reliance on long inputs.