MOOZY: A Patient-First Foundation Model for Computational Pathology
Authors: Yousef Kotp, Vincent Quoc-Huy Trinh, Christopher Pal, Mahdi S. Hosseini
Organizations: CSSE, Concordia University, Montréal, Canada · Mila – Québec AI Institute, Montréal, Canada · CHUM, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada · IRIC, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada · Université de Montréal, Montréal, Canada · Canada CIFAR Chair, Polytechnique Montréal, Montréal, Canada · Dept. of Pathology, McGill University, Montréal, Canada
Abstract
Computational pathology needs whole-slide image (WSI) foundation models that transfer across diverse clinical tasks, yet current approaches remain largely slide-centric, often depend on private data and expensive paired-report supervision, and do not explicitly model relationships among multiple slides from the same patient. We present MOOZY, a patient-first pathology foundation model in which the patient case, not the individual slide, is the core unit of representation. MOOZY explicitly models dependencies across all slides from the same patient via a case transformer during pretraining, combining multi-stage self-supervision with scaled low-cost task supervision. In Stage 1, we pretrain a vision-only slide encoder on 77,134 public slide feature grids using masked self-distillation. In Stage 2, we align these representations with clinical semantics using a case transformer and multi-task supervision over 333 tasks from 56 public datasets, including 205 classification and 128 survival tasks across four endpoints. Across sixteen held-out tasks, MOOZY improves macro weighted F1, balanced accuracy, and macro weighted ROC-AUC relative to PRISM by +4.19%, +7.93%, and +6.95%, respectively. MOOZY is also parameter efficient with 85.77M parameters, 14× smaller than GigaPath. These results suggest that patient-level pretraining yields transferable embeddings, providing a path toward scalable patient-first histopathology foundation models.
Foundation models are reshaping computational pathology, yet their capabilities remain shaped by pretraining objectives, data sources, and spatial scales, fragmenting complementary expertise across separate backbones. Here we present ALICE, a unified foundation model trained through multi-stage agglomerative distillation that sequentially distills eight vision-only, vision-language, and slide-level teacher models into dedicated modules of a single backbone. ALICE is pretrained on 24,985,184 tile-level pathology images and 155,604 high-resolution images, and evaluated across 21 task scenarios, 96 downstream tasks, and 48 data sources, spanning region-of-interest tissue analysis, vision-language multimodal evaluation, and whole-slide clinical assessment. In all three evaluation settings, ALICE achieved the best average rank among task-matched pathology foundation models. These results demonstrate that agglomerative distillation can consolidate complementary capabilities from specialized models into a unified backbone for broad computational pathology applications. The model is available at https://github.com/WonderLandxD/ALICE.
Pathology foundation models are pretrained on large streams of WSI-derived patches, while supervision during data construction is often slide-level, sparse, or heterogeneous. This mismatch makes it difficult to understand and control which biological patterns enter the pretraining data. We propose SlideCheck, a lightweight pretraining data guidance tool built on frozen pathology foundation model patch features. Rather than serving as a standalone patch diagnostic model, SlideCheck provides explicit abnormality and malignancy scores for organizing, filtering, and auditing pathology pretraining data. SlideCheck uses a dual-head MLP to separately model broad abnormal morphology and malignant evidence. A regularized feature-space scorer provides a supervised anchor for patch-level evidence estimation, while score-attention agreement combines patch scores with WSI-level MIL attention to mine high-confidence pseudo labels. The same scores are then used to construct broad-positive ViT pretraining subsets, where a patch is selected if either abnormality or malignancy evidence exceeds a threshold. Experiments show that SlideCheck-defined data distributions influence the downstream behavior of self-supervised ViT pretraining, indicating that biological composition is an important controllable factor in pathology foundation model development. Curated subsets can approach full-data performance, suggesting that explicitly scored patch pools may support more efficient and auditable pretraining data construction. These findings position SlideCheck as a data guidance and auditing layer for transforming large, undifferentiated patch pools into controllable and reusable pretraining datasets.
Foundation Models (FMs) have recently redefined the state-of-the-art in histopathology by providing robust representations for whole-slide image (WSI) analysis. However, selecting the optimal foundation model (FM) for a specific clinical cohort currently requires multiple preprocessing steps, followed by computationally expensive feature extraction and the training of a Multiple Instance Learning (MIL) aggregator for every model. In this work, we investigate whether efficient tile-level linear probing can serve as a reliable proxy for slide-level performance, reducing the need to run full slide-level pipelines for every candidate encoder. We benchmark 19 state-of-the-art FMs on 42 slide-level and 16 tile-level tasks, comparing tile probing metrics against slide-level outcomes using ABMIL and Mean Pooling aggregations. We observe a high correlation between tile and slide performance across varying task difficulties, indicating that encoder representation quality is the primary determinant of WSI success. Sensitivity analyses show that transferability is stable across models and is more influenced by cohort sizes and numbers of tiles per slide than by average task difficulty. We also measure the agreement in best performing models between tile and slide-level tasks, showing tile benchmarks reliably shortlist strong candidates. Overall, our study indicates that tile-level benchmarking provides an efficient and practical first step for narrowing down candidate models, while slide-level evaluation remains essential for final validation on clinical tasks.
Sofiène Boutaj, Leo Fillioux, Maria Vakalopoulou +2