LLM Enhanced Action Recognition via Hierarchical Global-Local Skeleton-Language Model
Authors: Ruosi Wang, Fangwei Zuo, Lei Li, Zhaoqiang Xia
Organizations: Northwestern Polytechnical University, No.1 Dongxiang Road, Chang’an District , Xi’an, 710129, Shaanxi, China · Shandong University of Finance and Economics, No.40 Shungeng Road, Licheng District, Jinan, Jinan, Shandong, China
Skeleton-based human action recognition has achieved remarkable progress in recent years. However, most existing GCN-based methods rely on short-range motion topologies, which not only struggle to capture long-range joint dependencies and complex temporal dynamics but also limit cross-modal semantic alignment and understanding due to insufficient modeling of action semantics. To address these challenges, we propose a hierarchical global-local skeleton-language model (HocSLM), enabling the large action model be more representative of action semantics. First, we design a hierarchical global-local network (HGLNet) that consists of a composite-topology spatial module and a dual-path hierarchical temporal module. By synergistically integrating multi-level global and local modules, HGLNet achieves dynamically collaborative modeling at both global and local scales while preserving prior knowledge of human physical structure, significantly enhancing the model's representation of complex spatio-temporal relationships. Then, a large vision-language model (VLM) is employed to generate textual descriptions by passing the original RGB video sequences to this model, providing the rich action semantics for further training the skeleton-language model. Furthermore, we introduce a skeleton-language sequential fusion module by combining the features from HGLNet and the generated descriptions, which utilizes a skeleton-language model (SLM) for aligning skeletal spatio-temporal features and textual action descriptions precisely within a unified semantic space. The SLM model could significantly enhance the HGLNet's semantic discrimination capabilities and cross-modal understanding abilities. Extensive experiments demonstrate that the proposed HocSLM achieves the state-of-the-art performance on three mainstream benchmark datasets: NTU RGB+D 60, NTU RGB+D 120, and Northwestern-UCLA.
Figures & tables
Figure 1: The architecture of the proposed HocSLM, including 1) Skeleton Component, 2) Language Component, and 3) Fusion Component.
Figure 2: Overall architecture of the CTS. The leftmost module is the feature preprocessing block. The upper orange region corresponds to the GSM, and the lower green region corresponds to the LSE.
Figure 3: Overall architecture of the DHT. The yellow region on the left half corresponds to the GTA, and the purple region on the right half corresponds to the LTC.
Figure 4: The overall architecture of SSF.
Figure 5: The overall architecture of 6-stream ensemble.
Method
X-Sub Acc (%)
X-View Acc (%)
ST-GCN Yan et al. (2018)
81.5
88.3
AS-GCN Li et al. (2019)
86.8
94.2
2s-AGCN Shi et al. (2019c)
88.5
95.1
SGN Zhang et al. (2020a)
89.0
94.5
AGC-LSTM Si et al. (2019)
89.2
95.0
DGNN Shi et al. (2019b)
89.9
96.1
Table 1: Comparison of different models on the NTU-RGB+D dataset.
Method
X-Sub Acc (%)
X-View Acc (%)
ST-GCN Yan et al. (2018)
70.7
73.2
2s-AGCN Shi et al. (2019c)
82.5
84.2
SGN Zhang et al. (2020a)
79.2
81.5
ST-TR-agcn Plizzari et al. (2021)
85.1
87.1
Shift-GCN Cheng et al. (2020b)
85.9
87.6
DC-GCN + ADG Cheng et al. (2020a)
86.5
88.1
Table 2: Comparison of different models on the NTU-RGB+D120 dataset.
Method
Acc (%)
Shift-GCN Cheng et al. (2020b)
94.6
GSTLN Dai et al. (2023)
94.8
CTR-GCN Chen et al. (2021a)
96.5
Info-GCN Chi et al. (2022)
96.6
MSS-GCN Jang et al. (2024)
96.6
SAN-GCN Tian et al. (2023)
96.8
Table 3: Comparison of different models on the Northwestern-UCLA dataset.
Configuration
CTS
DHT
SSF
Top-1 (%)
Performance
(Baseline + Components)
enhancement(%)
Baseline (CTR-GCN)
-
-
-
89.96
-
Baseline + CTS
✓
-
-
90.31
0.35
Baseline + CTS + DHT
✓
✓
-
90.63
0.67
HocSLM
✓
✓
✓
90.84
0.88
Table 4: Fine-grained Ablation on Different Core Components.
Configuration
CTS Module
DHT Module
Top-1 (%)
Baseline (CTR-GCN)
-
-
89.96
Only Local
Only LSE
Only LTC
89.71
w/o GSM
Only LSE
LTC + GTA
90.20
w/o GTA
LSE + GSM
Only LTC
90.37
HGLNet
LSE + GSM
LTC + GTA
90.63
Table 5: Fine-grained ablation on HGLNet components.
Strategy
Skeleton Encoder
MLP
LLM
Training Loss
Top-1 (%)
T0 (Baseline)
Trained (HGLNet)
–
–
Lcls
90.63
T1
Frozen → Unfrozen
Trained
Frozen
Stage1: Lgen only
89.08
Stage2: Lcls only
T2
Trained
Trained
Frozen
Lgen→Lcls
90.73
T3 (Ours)
Trained
Trained
Frozen
Lgen+Lcls
90.84
T4
Trained from scratch
Trained
Frozen
Lgen+Lcls
68.23
Table 6: Ablation on training paradigms and effectiveness conditions of SSF.
Streams
Method
Top-1 (%)
1s
Joint only
90.84
Bone only
91.51
Joint Motion only
89.15
Bone Motion only
88.72
Joint 2nd-order only
91.42
Vel 2nd-order only
88.87
Table 7: Ablation on multi-stream fusion strategies.
Figure 6: Visualization of skeleton diagrams and joint-Joint attention matrices for six typical actions.
Figure 7: The generated text examples by Qwen3-4B based HocSLM.
School of Cyber Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China · School of Computer Science and Engineering, Southeast University, Nanjing, China
Suzhou Institute for Advanced Research, University of Science and Technology of China, Suzhou, China · Inria Center at Universit´e Cˆote d’Azur, Valbonne, France · Woven by Toyota, Tokyo, Japan +1