We introduce Complet4R, a novel end-to-end framework for Geometric Complete 4D Reconstruction, which aims to recover temporally coherent and geometrically complete reconstruction for dynamic scenes. Our method formalizes the task of Geometric Complete 4D Reconstruction as a unified framework of reconstruction and completion, by directly accumulating full contexts onto each frame. Unlike previous approaches that rely on pairwise reconstruction or local motion estimation, Complet4R utilizes a decoder-only transformer to operate all context globally directly from sequential video input, reconstructing a complete geometry for every single timestamp, including occluded regions visible in other frames. Our method demonstrates the state-of-the-art performance on our proposed benchmark for Geometric Complete 4D Reconstruction and the 3D Point Tracking task. Code will be released to support future research.
Figures & tables
Figure 2: Geometric 4D complete reconstruction from observations. Given input frames, Complet4R aggregates contextual information across all timestamps. Consequently, at each timestamp T , the reconstructed scene incorporates the geometry from frame T along with complementary information from all other frames.
Figure 3: Architecture Overview. By concatenating special aggregation tokens, Complet4R identifies the specific timestamp for aggregation. The Aggregation head then outputs the positions of 3D points from other views at this timestamp, aggregating 3D point maps across frames to form a complete geometric representation.
Acc. ↓
Complet. ↓
N.C. ↑
Methods
Mean
Med.
Mean
Med.
Mean
Med.
St4RTrack-seq
0.92
0.71
3.10
0.17
0.48
0.47
St4RTrack-pairs
0.94
0.77
2.67
0.14
0.46
0.44
Complet4R (Ours)
0.50
0.37
0.26
0.11
0.49
0.49
Table 1: 4D Complete Reconstruction on SAIL-VOS 3D-test. We report Accuracy (Acc.), Completion (Complet.), and Normal Consistency (N.C.) on all points; each metric is shown as Mean and Median. Best results are bold .
PO
DR
ADT
PStudio
Category
Methods
APD ↑
EPE ↓
APD ↑
EPE ↓
APD ↑
EPE ↓
APD ↑
EPE ↓
Combinational
SpaTracker+RANSAC-Procrustes
53.77
43.58
58.58
104.44
66.49
16.00
52.05
42.66
SpaTracker+MonST3R
58.61
40.85
59.21
91.36
69.94
15.11
50.16
48.37
Feed-forward
MonST3R
39.36
64.52
51.86
53.13
67.92
15.78
51.32
45.68
SpaTracker
51.20
46.95
58.65
108.28
67.65
16.28
62.59
30.94
St4RTrack
68.72
29.70
68.13
29.61
75.34
12.12
69.67
26.37
Table 2: World Coordinate 3D Point Tracking on Dynamic Points. We report both APD and EPE for four datasets: PO (Point Odyssey), DR (Dynamic Replica), ADT (Aria Digital Twin), and PStudio (Panoptic Studio). Best results are bold .
Figure 4: Qualitative Results for 4D Complete Reconstruction. The first column shows the video inputs, with red boxes indicating the target aggregation timestamp for each sequence ( Agg. : aggregation). The subsequent columns present the outputs of different models. Our method successfully reconstructs the complete geometry at the target timestamp highlighted by the red ellipses, whereas other methods produce incomplete or geometrically inconsistent reconstructions.
Figure 5: Qualitative Results for 3D Dynamic Point Tracking. The first column shows the input images; the second and third columns display the tracking trajectories produced by our method at successive time steps. The smooth trajectories demonstrate strong spatiotemporal geometric consistency.
Acc. ↓
Complet. ↓
N.C. ↑
Variants
Loss
Agg. Repre.
Agg. Token
Mean
Med.
Mean
Med.
Mean
Med.
(1)
Dynamic
-
-
0.50
0.47
0.26
0.20
0.48
0.47
(2)
-
Offset
-
0.63
0.42
0.50
0.11
0.44
0.40
(3)
-
-
Add
0.57
0.38
0.32
0.12
0.50
0.49
Complet4R (Ours)
Focal
Endpoint
Concatenate
0.50
0.37
0.26
0.11
0.49
0.49
Table 3: Ablation Study on 4D Complete Reconstruction on SAIL-VOS 3D-test. Accuracy (Acc.), Completion (Complet.), and Normal Consistency (N.C.) are reported over all points; each metric includes Mean and Median. Agg. Repre. means the aggregation representation, Agg. Token means aggregation tokens. Best results are bold . The symbol “-” indicates the default setting same as Complet4R.
PO
DR
ADT
PStudio
Category
Methods
APD ↑
EPE ↓
APD ↑
EPE ↓
APD ↑
EPE ↓
APD ↑
EPE ↓
Combinational
SpaTracker+RANSAC-Procrustes
61.00
33,38
61.65
37.20
88.65
5.96
67.82
26.60
SpaTracker+MonST3R
61.78
32.90
61.88
36.81
87.32
4.85
64.32
29.71
Feed-forward
MonST3R
48.95
47.68
55.36
38.72
84.73
7.20
64.11
30.15
SpaTracker
60.49
33.74
61.32
37.50
87.68
6.16
80.76
16.50
St4RTrack
67.43
28.70
67.90
26.27
85.34
6.88
76.97
19.69
Table 4: World Coordinate 3D Point Tracking on Dynamic Points with Global SIM(3) Alignment.
Sintel
BONN
KITTI
Method
Abs Rel ↓
δ < 1.25↑
Abs Rel ↓
δ < 1.25↑
Abs Rel ↓
δ < 1.25↑
VGGT
0.298
68.1
0.057
96.8
0.061
97.0
CUT3R
0.421
47.9
0.078
93.7
0.118
88.1
Ours
0.353
63.9
0.066
95.9
0.079
94.9
Table 5: Evaluation on Video Depth Estimation.
Sintel
ScanNet
Method
ATE ↓
RPE trans ↓
RPE rot ↓
ATE ↓
RPE trans ↓
RPE rot ↓
VGGT
0.168
0.065
0.477
0.035
0.015
0.380
CUT3R
0.213
0.066
0.621
0.099
0.022
0.600
Ours
0.215
0.089
1.081
0.050
0.023
0.549
Table 6: Evaluation on Camera Pose Estimation.
Frames
2
4
8
16
32
64
128
256
Time (s)
0.10
0.15
0.26
0.51
1.16
2.95
8.53
27.86
Mem. (GB)
7.0
7.6
9.0
10.2
12.6
15.1
18.0
28.6
Table 7: Runtime and GPU memory consumption for different sequence lengths. Runtime is measured in seconds, and GPU memory usage is reported in gigabytes.
Figure 6: More Qualitative Results for 4D Complete Reconstruction. The first column shows the video inputs, with red boxes indicating the target aggregation timestamp for each sequence ( Agg. : aggregation). The subsequent columns present the outputs of different models. Our method successfully reconstructs the complete geometry at the target timestamp highlighted by the red ellipses, whereas other methods produce incomplete or geometrically inconsistent reconstructions.
Figure 7: Comparison with DreamScene4D. The left shows the video inputs, while the right presents the reconstruction results: (a) from DreamScene4D, and (b) from our method. Our approach demonstrates higher reconstruction quality.
Figure 8: More Qualitative Results for 3D Dynamic Point Tracking. The first column shows the input images; the second and third columns display the tracking trajectories produced by our method at successive time steps. The smooth trajectories demonstrate strong spatiotemporal geometric consistency.
We address 4D reconstruction from partial point cloud sequences, where depth-sensor observations are incomplete, unordered, and lack explicit temporal correspondences. This geometry-only setting is challenging due to missing observations and ambiguous dynamics. While recent progress has largely relied on image-based methods, existing point-based approaches typically focus on single objects, assume relatively complete inputs, or require explicit correspondences. To address these limitations, we propose DynaTok, a point-based framework for correspondence-free 4D reconstruction from partial point cloud sequences without images. DynaTok encodes frames into compact latent tokens, aggregates incomplete observations over time with a Transformer-based spatiotemporal encoder, and decouples geometry and motion through residual tokens in a unified model. A flow-matching decoder then reconstructs complete, temporally consistent 4D point-cloud sequences conditioned on the latent tokens. Experiments on object- and scene-level benchmarks demonstrate improved reconstruction quality and temporal coherence from partial point cloud observations. Project page: https://wrchen530.github.io/dynatok/.
Weirong Chen, Keisuke Tateno, Hidenobu Matsuki +3
TU Munich · Google · Munich Center for Machine Learning
Geometry Foundation Models (GFMs) have substantially advanced monocular 3D reconstruction, yet extending this capability to 4D dynamic understanding remains a fundamental challenge. Most existing motion perception methods (e.g., sparse tracking, dense point-wise flow) treat motion as independent point-wise displacements, ignoring the structured nature of physical motion. However, real-world objects usually obey rigid-body kinematics, and points thus usually move collectively, not in isolation. Motion itself possesses geometric structure: physical objects undergo a set of rigid-body transformations governed by SE(3), rather than unstructured point-wise displacements. Building on this insight, we propose SM4RT, a Structured Motion 4D Reconstruction Transformer for end-to-end 3D reconstruction and structured motion perception. SM4RT introduces Structure-of-Motion to represent scene dynamics, where scene motion is decomposed into a compact set of motion bases, each represented as a temporal sequence of 6D twists in SE(3). Dense scene motion is then recovered by sparse, time-shared per-pixel assignment weights over these bases, ensuring points on the same object share a common rigid-body motion trajectory. SM4RT introduces a parallel motion geometry encoder and decoder that jointly infer 3D geometry, world-coordinate motion, and scene kinematic structure in a single forward pass from monocular RGB video. SM4RT achieves strong motion reconstruction performance while preserving the geometric structure of scene motion.
Reconstructing dynamic 4D scenes is an important yet challenging task. While 3D foundation models like VGGT excel in static settings, they often struggle with dynamic sequences where motion causes significant geometric ambiguity. To address this, we present a framework designed to disentangle dynamic and static components by modeling uncertainty across different stages of the reconstruction process. Our approach introduces three synergistic mechanisms: (1) Entropy-Guided Subspace Projection, which leverages information-theoretic weighting to adaptively aggregate multi-head attention distributions, effectively isolating dynamic motion cues from semantic noise; (2) Local-Consistency Driven Geometry Purification, which enforces spatial continuity via radius-based neighborhood constraints to eliminate structural outliers; and (3) Uncertainty-Aware Cross-View Consistency, which formulates multi-view projection refinement as a heteroscedastic maximum likelihood estimation problem, utilizing depth confidence as a probabilistic weight. Experiments on dynamic benchmarks show that our approach outperforms current state-of-the-art methods, reducing Mean Accuracy error by 13.43% and improving segmentation F-measure by 10.49%. Our framework maintains the efficiency of feed-forward inference and requires no task-specific fine-tuning or per-scene optimization.
Ying Zang, Yidong Han, Chaotao Ding +8
Huzhou University · KOKONI 3D, Moxin Technology · Univeristy of Science and Technology of China +3