cs.ROMar 30, 2026

On-Demand Human Assistance for Task Continuation under Physical Action Failures in LLM-based Planning

Authors: Shoichi Hasegawa, Akira Taniguchi, Lotfi El Hafi, Gustavo Alfonso Garcia Ricardez, Tadahiro Taniguchi

Organizations: Shoichi Hasegawa and Akira Taniguchi are with Ritsumeikan University; 2-150 Iwakura, Ibaraki, Osaka 567-8570, Japan. · Akira Taniguchi is with Kyushu Institute of Technology; 680-4 Kawadu, Iizuka, Fukuoka 820-0067, Japan. · Lotfi El Hafi is with Coarobo GK; 2-2-2 Hikaridai, Seika, Soura, Kyoto 619-0237, Japan. · Lotfi El Hafi and Tadahiro Taniguchi are with Ritsumeikan University Research Organization of Science and Technology; 1-1-1 Nojihigashi, Kusatsu, Shiga 525-8527, Japan. · Gustavo Alfonso Garcia Ricardez is with The University of Osaka; 1-3 Machikaneyama, Toyonaka, Osaka 560-8531, Japan. · Gustavo Alfonso Garcia Ricardez is with Ritsumeikan Global Innovation Research Organization; 1-1-1 Nojihigashi, Kusatsu, Shiga 525-8527, Japan. · Tadahiro Taniguchi is with Kyoto University; Yoshida Honmachi, Sakyo, Kyoto, Kyoto 606-8317, Japan.

Abstract

While robot action planning based on large language models (LLMs) has advanced remarkably, continuing a task after a physical action failure during execution remains a key challenge. For example, after failing to grasp an object, the robot may not notice that it has fallen off the table and keep trying to detect and pick it up, stalling the task. Existing approaches either rely on closed-loop autonomous re-planning, which fails when errors exceed the robot's capabilities, or on human intervention without updating the LLM's plan, hindering subsequent planning. We present a system for LLM-based robot action planning that integrates remote human intervention with feedback-based replanning. When the LLM detects an action failure, the robot requests remote assistance; an operator resolves the failure through teleoperation and reports the outcome in natural language, which is fed back to the LLM to update its plan so that the task can continue. We evaluated the proposed system on a real-world trash-collection task, comparing it with a fully autonomous method and a teleoperation-only baseline. The proposed system improves task progress over the autonomous method in this case study. For easy-to-retrieve trash, the gap from the teleoperation reference was small, while a larger gap remained for harder-to-retrieve trash. These results suggest that, in this case study, combining remote human intervention with feedback-based replanning was associated with continued task execution even in the face of otherwise unrecoverable failures. The project website is https://emergentsystemlabstudent.github.io/REPAIR/.

Figures & tables

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. Anticipate, Adapt, Act: A Hybrid Framework for Task Planning

    Feb 23, 2026Nabanita Dash, Ayush Kaura, Shivam Singh +4Robot Task PlanningHuman-Robot Collaboration

  2. HEART: Coordination of Heterogeneous Expert Agents for Physically Grounded Robotic Task Planning

    Jun 24, 2026Junho Lee, Seabin Lee, Wonjong Lee +3Large Language Model-Based Robot PlanningRobot Task Planning

  3. Design and Evaluation of LLM Chaining-Based Task Planning for General Purpose Service Robots

    Sep 24, 2026Lucas Da Mota Bruno, Jiahao Sim, Yoshinobu HagiwaraLarge Language Model-Based Robot PlanningRobotics