Recent image generation models have shown strong capabilities in generating high-fidelity and photorealistic images. However, they are fundamentally constrained by frozen internal knowledge, thus often failing on real-world scenarios that are knowledge-intensive or require up-to-date information. In this paper, we present Gen-Searcher, as the first attempt to train a search-augmented image generation agent, which performs multi-hop reasoning and search to collect the textual knowledge and reference images needed for grounded generation. To achieve this, we construct a tailored data pipeline and curate two high-quality datasets, Gen-Searcher-SFT-10k and Gen-Searcher-RL-6k, containing diverse search-intensive prompts and corresponding ground-truth synthesis images. We further introduce KnowGen, a comprehensive benchmark that explicitly requires search-grounded external knowledge for image generation and evaluates models from multiple dimensions. Based on these resources, we train Gen-Searcher with SFT followed by agentic reinforcement learning with dual reward feedback, which combines text-based and image-based rewards to provide more stable and informative learning signals for GRPO training. Experiments show that Gen-Searcher brings substantial gains, improving Qwen-Image by around 16 points on KnowGen and 15 points on WISE. We hope this work can serve as an open foundation for search agents in image generation, and we fully open-source our data, models, and code.
Figure 3: An illustration of our data curation pipeline.
Figure 4: Overview of the KnowGen benchmark.
Figure 5: An inference example of Gen-Searcher.
Models
Science & Knowledge
Pop Culture & News
Overall
Visual cor.
Text acc.
Faithfulness
Aesthetics
Visual cor.
Text acc.
Faithfulness
Aesthetics
K-Score
GPT-Image-1 OpenAI (2024)
20.92
27.89
72.79
63.95
19.43
31.98
84.64
61.60
34.19
GPT-Image-1.5 OpenAI (2025a)
29.25
40.14
81.29
77.21
29.43
46.22
89.64
71.17
44.97
Nano Banana DeepMind (2025c)
18.03
19.39
72.79
65.82
14.24
26.04
84.39
70.91
30.24
Nano Banana Pro DeepMind (2025b)
39.46
49.32
86.22
70.92
30.51
53.37
91.07
68.75
50.38
Seedream 4.0 Seedream et al. (2025)
13.10
24.66
62.93
64.97
11.90
22.19
78.72
70.24
28.21
Table 1: Performance of different models on our KnowGen benchmark. Visual cor. and Text acc. denote Visual correctness and Text accuracy, respectively. The overall K-Score is averaged over the Science & Knowledge and Pop Culture & News subsets.
Models
Cultural
Time
Space
Biology
Physics
Chemistry
Overall
FLUX.1-dev black-forest-labs (2024)
0.48
0.58
0.62
0.42
0.51
0.35
0.50
FLUX.1-schnell black-forest-labs (2024)
0.39
0.44
0.50
0.31
0.44
0.26
0.40
SD-3-Medium AI (2024a)
0.42
0.44
0.48
0.39
0.47
0.29
0.42
SD-3.5-Medium AI (2024c)
0.43
0.50
0.52
0.41
0.53
0.33
0.45
SD-3.5-Large AI (2024b)
0.44
0.50
0.58
0.44
0.52
0.31
0.46
Emu3 Wang et al. (2024)
0.34
0.45
0.48
0.41
0.45
0.27
0.39
Table 2: Performance of different models on the WISE benchmark.
Methods
KnowGen
Qwen-Image
14.98
Qwen-Image + workflow
22.91
Qwen-Image + Gen-Searcher-SFT
28.15
Qwen-Image + Gen-Searcher w.o. text reward
29.59
Qwen-Image + Gen-Searcher w.o. image reward
29.36
Qwen-Image + Gen-Searcher
31.52
Table 3: Ablation Study.
Figure 6: Examples of generated images by different methods on our KnowGen benchmark.