ASTRA: Mapping Art-Technology Institutions via Conceptual Axes, Text Embeddings, and Unsupervised Clustering

Implicit artistic influence, although visually plausible, is often undocumented and thus poses a historically constrained attribution problem: resemblance is necessary but not sufficient evidence. Most prior systems reduce influence discovery to embedding similarity or label-driven graph completion, while recent multimodal large language models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to temporal inconsistency and unverified attributions. This paper introduces M-ArtAgent, an evidence-based multimodal agent that reframes implicit influence discovery as probabilistic adjudication. It follows a four-phase protocol consisting of Investigation, Corroboration, Falsification, and Verdict governed by a Reasoning and Acting (ReAct)-style controller that assembles verifiable evidence chains from images and biographies, enforces art-historical axioms, and subjects each hypothesis to adversarial falsification via a prompt-isolated critic. Two theory-grounded operators, StyleComparator for Wolfflin formal analysis and ConceptRetriever for ICONCLASS-based iconographic grounding, ensure that intermediate claims are formally auditable. On the balanced WikiArt Influence Benchmark-100 (WIB-100) of 100 artists and 2,000 directed pairs, M-ArtAgent achieves 83.7% positive-class F1, 0.666 Matthews correlation coefficient (MCC), and 0.910 area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC-AUC), with leakage-control and robustness checks confirming that the gains persist when explicit influence phrases are masked. By coupling multimodal perception with domain-constrained falsification, M-ArtAgent demonstrates that implicit influence analysis benefits from historically grounded adjudication rather than pattern matching alone.

We present a proof-of-concept system that automates iconographic classification and content-based recommendation of digitized artworks using the Iconclass vocabulary and selected artificial intelligence methods. The prototype implements a four-stage workflow for classification and recommendation, which integrates YOLOv8 object detection with algorithmic mappings to Iconclass codes, rule-based inference for abstract meanings, and three complementary recommenders (hierarchical proximity, IDF-weighted overlap, and Jaccard similarity). Although more engineering is still needed, the evaluation demonstrates the potential of this solution: Iconclass-aware computer vision and recommendation methods can accelerate cataloging and enhance navigation in large heritage repositories. The key insight is to let computer vision propose visible elements and to use symbolic structures (Iconclass hierarchy) to reach meaning.

Analyzing digitized artworks requires both visual interpretation and deep artistic, contextual, and historical knowledge. We introduce ArtSeek, a multimodal framework for art analysis that combines multimodal large language models with retrieval-augmented generation. Unlike prior work, our pipeline relies only on image input, so it applies to artworks without links to Wikidata or Wikipedia, common in most digitized collections. ArtSeek integrates three components: a late-interaction multimodal retrieval module, a contrastive multitask network predicting artist, genre, style, media, and tags, and an agentic reasoning strategy enabled through in-context examples. Central to this approach is WikiFragments, a dataset of image-text fragments extracted from the entire English Wikipedia to support knowledge-grounded multimodal reasoning. Our multimodal query encoding raises retrieval NDCG@5 from 33.9 to 44.9 over encoding the full image-text query, and fixed-budget token pooling keeps late-interaction search practical over millions of fragments at under 7% of the cost of full multi-vector retrieval. ArtSeek sets a new state of the art in artwork attribute classification, with +8.4% F1 in style classification over GraphCLIP, and gains +7.1 BLEU@1 on ArtPedia captioning. On five knowledge-grounded question answering benchmarks graded by an LLM judge from a different model family, retrieval helps where the answer is documented in our index or lies inside the classifier's label space (+0.19 mean correctness on two of them) and is neutral where it is not; what separates the two regimes is how much of a benchmark our knowledge base covers. The gain transfers to two non-Qwen backbones (+0.22 to +0.28). A blind human study and a qualitative analysis of successes and failures corroborate this picture and expose where retrieval still misleads. Data and code: https://cilab.di.uniba.it/artseek/