Symmetrizing Bregman Divergence on the Cone of Positive Definite Matrices: Which Mean to Use and Why

Low-rank matrix optimization is often carried out via the Burer-Monteiro (BM) formulation, but choosing the factorization rank $r$ is delicate and can substantially slow optimization. We propose a unified framework, termed direction-magnitude decomposition (DMD), that decomposes the optimization variable to improve optimization efficiency even when the target rank is unknown. We develop two DMD-based approaches and establish their theoretical advantages on the canonical problem of matrix factorization. The first, overparameterized DMD, uses a rank $r$ larger than necessary and enjoys faster convergence as $r$ increases. The second, recursive DMD, is motivated by the incremental eigenpair learning, or saddle-to-saddle, behavior of overparameterized DMD. It achieves lower memory and computational costs, complementing overparameterized DMD. Both approaches are exponentially faster than gradient descent applied to the BM formulation. Numerical experiments on matrix factorization, sensing, and completion corroborate our theoretical findings and demonstrate the practical effectiveness of DMD.

The choice of Riemannian metric can strongly influence the convergence of gradient-based optimization over covariance matrices. Euclidean, Bures-Wasserstein and affine-invariant metrics are common choices, but their relative effectiveness depends on the objective. We introduce a two-parameter family defined by $X^{p}LX^{q}+X^{q}LX^{p}=U$, solved for $L$ at each tangent vector $U$, that contains all three as exact members, at $(0,0)$, $(1,0)$ and $(1,1)$, and extends past them. We treat the choice of member as a particular way of preconditioning for a given problem. To this end, we analyze the conditioning of the Riemannian Hessian at the solution. We show that it obeys a lower bound that depends on $(p,q)$ only through the exponent $r=p+q$. When the Euclidean Hessian is a pure power that mixes no eigendirections, the member $p=q=r/2$ attains that bound, and a closed-form criterion identifies the other members that do. We discuss ways to tune $r$ for a given problem. Experiments on real covariance data confirm the predicted conditioning and the benefit of tuning $r$. A task covariance example shows a further gain from tuning the shape.

The computation of the Bures-Wasserstein (BW) barycenter of an ensemble of positive definite matrices arises throughout machine learning, optimal transport, and quantum information. Riemannian gradient descent (RGD) at unit step size -- the fixed-point iteration used in practice -- converges rapidly, yet existing analyses present a dichotomy: unit-step guarantees carry worst-case exponential dependence on the dimension, while dimension-independent guarantees require small step sizes that forfeit the empirical speed. We resolve this dichotomy, not by improving the guarantees for unit-step RGD, but by proposing a Projected RGD algorithm that achieves dimension-independent linear convergence at unit step size. The achieved rate, $(1 - κ^{-3/2})$, where $κ$ is the condition number of the ensemble, also polynomially improves on the best small-step guarantee ($κ^{3/2}$ versus $κ^{5/2}$ iteration complexity). The crux is a novel Projection Lemma: clipping the eigenvalues of a positive matrix to an interval $[α, β]$ is the closed-form, non-expansive (1-Lipschitz) BW-metric projection onto the set $\{S : αI \leq S \leq βI\}$ -- a statement which, unlike its known one-sided counterpart, does not follow from convexity. The projection is moreover free: it reuses an eigendecomposition the next iteration must perform in any case, so the projected and unprojected iterations cost the same per step. The same analysis covers the invariant matrix projection problem of Brahmachari et al. (2025), whose fixed-point algorithm we identify as unit-step RGD on a totally geodesic submanifold, thereby extending the dimension-independent guarantee to that setting verbatim.