SLVMEval: Synthetic Meta Evaluation Benchmark for Text-to-Long Video Generation

Existing text-to-video (T2V) evaluation benchmarks, such as VBench and EvalCrafter, predominantly contain either subject-centric prompts or static camera scenes, overlooking the importance of camera motion, essential for producing cinematic shots with realistic scenes. Due to this, the metrics developed in these works often produce incorrect results in the presence of camera motion. To fill this gap, we introduce DynamicEval, a benchmark comprising of systematically curated prompts that emphasize dynamic camera motion, paired with 45k human annotations on video pairs. DynamicEval evaluates two key dimensions of video quality: the consistency of the foreground subjects and the consistency of the background scene. To address the shortcomings of existing metrics under camera motion, we introduce two novel metrics: 1) Tracker-FG, which evaluates subject consistency by assessing the keypoint tracks of the subject. 2) Debiased Motion Smoothness, for background consistency, devoid from issues of occlusions/disocclusions arising from camera and foreground subject movements. Extensive experiments on the large-scale DynamicEval benchmark demonstrate that our proposed metrics achieve stronger correlations with human preferences at both the video level, and the model level with an increase of 0.32 in average Pearson Linear Correlation.

Long-form video generation is rapidly moving from short, single-scene synthesis toward minute-long, multi-shot creation with narrative structure, cinematic control, audio, and cross-modal synchronization. However, evaluating such videos remains challenging, since existing benchmarks largely focus on local visual quality, short-horizon temporal consistency, or generic prompt alignment, and provide limited diagnosis of workflow failures and user-dependent preferences. We introduce DirectorBench, a personalized multi-agent diagnostic benchmark for long-form video generation. DirectorBench evaluates generated videos with respect to 80 structured metadata entries, 7 user profiles, and 40 checkpoint criteria across 5 dimensions: script, visual, audio, cross-modal, and stability. Instead of reducing quality to a single aggregate score, DirectorBench localizes checkpoint-level bottlenecks and supports profile-aware evaluation. We evaluate 4 long-form video generation workflows, 6 base LLMs, and 7 user profiles. Across workflows, DirectorBench reveals a between-unit bottleneck: transition quality averages only 0.256 and reaches 0.356 for the best workflow, while prompt-level user demand fulfillment averages 0.71. We further conduct human evaluation with 14 annotators to validate the alignment between DirectorBench and human judgment. The results show that DirectorBench captures human-perceptible quality differences and reveals workflow- and profile-dependent failure modes that are hidden by aggregate scoring. These findings highlight the importance of diagnostic and profile-aware benchmarking for long-form video generation.

Modern video generators can synthesize convincing scenes while rendering a few characters incorrectly, omitting requested text, or changing it across frames. Measuring these failures is harder than applying OCR independently to each frame: when a scene contains multiple text targets and multiple noisy OCR regions, the evaluator must first determine which observation belongs to which intended text. We introduce TextVBench, a benchmark and evaluation framework that formulates visual-text evaluation as a multi-target, multi-instance spatiotemporal correspondence problem. TextVBench contains two complementary tracks: TextVBench-T2V measures the creation and maintenance of prompt-specified text, while TextVBench-Ref2V measures preservation of text from reference images. Both tracks use target-conditioned candidate selection rather than unconstrained VLM transcription, support one target mapping to multiple OCR regions, and separate frame-level spatial fidelity from cross-frame temporal fidelity. A length-weighted harmonic score summarizes these factors, while extra-text diagnostics expose failure modes hidden by a single OCR score. The benchmark is organized around controlled text, layout, carrier, and motion attributes so that aggregate scores can be traced back to specific capability limits. Across the evaluated model runs, MiniMax-H3 reaches a T2V TextVScore of 68.32, while the strongest Ref2V score is 56.51; attribute slices reveal a pronounced drop as the number of simultaneous reference text regions increases.