SuperGrasp: Single-View Object Grasping via Superquadric Similarity Matching, Evaluation, and Refinement
Abstract
Robotic grasping from single-view observations remains a critical challenge in manipulation. However, existing methods still struggle to generate reliable grasp candidates and stably evaluate grasp feasibility under incomplete geometric information. To address these limitations, we present SuperGrasp, a new two-stage framework for single-view parallel-jaw grasping. In the first stage, we introduce a Similarity Matching Module that efficiently retrieves valid and diverse grasp candidates by matching the input single-view point cloud with a precomputed primitive dataset based on superquadric coefficients. In the second stage, we propose E-RNet, an end-to-end network that expands the grasp-aware region and takes the initial grasp closure region as a local anchor region, capturing the contextual relationship between the local region and its surrounding spatial neighborhood, thereby enabling more accurate and reliable grasp evaluation and introducing small-range local refinement to improve grasp adaptability. To enhance generalization, we construct a primitive dataset containing 1.2k standard geometric primitives for similarity matching and collect a point cloud dataset of 100k samples from 124 objects, annotated with stable grasp labels for network training. Extensive experiments in both simulation and real-world environments demonstrate that our method achieves stable grasping performance and good generalization across novel objects and clutter scenes.
Figures & tables
| Method | Seen(obj=10, scene=30) | Seen(obj=20, scene=30) | Unseen(obj=10, scene=30) | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSR | TSR | GA | GSR | TSR | GA | GSR | TSR | GA | |
| PointNetGPD [ 7 ] | 78.76% | 29.67% | 113 | 59.43% | 34.67% | 350 | 33.90% | 6.67% | 59 |
| Contact-GraspNet [ 16 ] | 78.25% | 80.33% | 308 | 75.42% | 82.83% | 659 | 63.91% | 69.67% | 327 |
| Chen et al. [ 5 ] | – | – | – | – | – | – | 58.14% | 83.33% | 430 |
| Ours (S1) + PointNetGPD [ 7 ] | 63.34% | 72.00% | 341 | 38.42% | 47.83% | 747 | 31.62% | 37.00% | 351 |
| PointNetGPD [ 7 ] + Ours (S2) | 93.60% | 53.67% | 172 | 79.02% | 48.33% | 367 | 87.85% | 31.33% | 107 |
| Method | Similar (obj=10, scene=10) | Novel (obj=10, scene=10) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| GSR | TSR | GSR | TSR | |
| PointNetGPD [ 7 ] | 58.82% | 20.00% | 52.38% | 11.00% |
| Contact-GraspNet [ 16 ] | 78.95% | 60.00% | 74.65% | 53.00% |
| Chen et al. [ 5 ] | – | – | 69.23% | 90.00% |
| Ours | 98.00% | 98.00% | 94.12% | 96.00% |
| Method | Stage-1 (s) | Stage-2 (s) | Total (s) |
|---|---|---|---|
| PointNetGPD [ 7 ] | 9.276 | 0.732 | 10.008 |
| Contact-GraspNet [ 16 ] | – | – | 0.333 |
| Chen et al. [ 5 ] | 0.509 | 1.484 | 1.993 |
| Ours | 0.346 | 0.367 | 0.713 |