Eyla: Toward an Identity-Anchored LLM Architecture with Integrated Biological Priors -- Vision, Implementation Attempt, and Lessons from AI-Assisted Development
Organizations: Independent Researcher, Dhaka, Bangladesh
Abstract
We present the design rationale, implementation attempt, and failure analysis of Eyla, a proposed identity-anchored LLM architecture that integrates biologically-inspired subsystems -- including HiPPO-initialized state-space models, zero-initialized adapters, episodic memory retrieval, and calibrated uncertainty training -- into a unified agent operating system running on consumer hardware. Unlike existing approaches that optimize models for generic helpfulness, Eyla targets identity consistency: the ability to maintain a coherent self-model under adversarial pressure, admit uncertainty, and resist manipulation. We propose the Identity Consistency Score (ICS), a novel benchmark for evaluating this property across LLMs. We then present an honest account of attempting to implement this architecture using AI coding assistants (Claude Code, Cursor) as a non-programmer, documenting a $1,000+ failure that produced a 1.27B parameter model with 86 brain subsystems contributing less than 2% to output. Our analysis identifies five systematic failure modes of AI-assisted development for novel architectures and offers concrete recommendations. To our knowledge, this is the first paper to combine an architectural vision with a documented first-person failure analysis of AI-assisted LLM development, providing lessons for both the AI systems and AI-assisted software engineering communities.
Figures & tables
| System | AI Implementation | Exists? |
|---|---|---|
| Sleep consolidation | Letta sleep-time compute | Yes |
| Experience distillation | EvolveR lifecycle | Yes |
| Episodic memory | A-MEM Zettelkasten | Yes |
| Curiosity drive | MAGELLAN exploration | Yes |
| Theory of Mind | ToM-LM probing | Partial |
| Resource limits | CogSis homeostasis | Yes |
| Component | Files | Status |
|---|---|---|
| Core model | 7 | Working, passes tests |
| Brain systems | 31 | Built, mostly unused |
| Training scripts | 12 | Partially functional |
| Memory system | 4 | Written, never wired |
| Server/inference | 3 | Deployed but disabled |
| Test suites | 10 | Pass, but test wrong things |
| Activity | Cost | Outcome |
|---|---|---|
| RunPod GPU: brain training (25,908 steps) | $16 | Gates moved 2% |
| RunPod GPU: earlier failed runs | $200–400 | No surviving logs |
| GGUF conversion attempts | $50–100 | Garbage output |
| VPS server hosting | $200+ | Ran generic 3B |
| Anthropic API / Claude Pro | $200+ | Code generation |
| Total estimated | $700–1,100 |
Language Modeling
Language modeling develops systems that learn patterns in text and other sequences to understand, predict, and generate language.
See all 519 papers