cs.LGApr 1, 2026

G-Drift MIA: Membership Inference via Gradient-Induced Feature Drift in LLMs

Authors: Ravi Ranjan, Utkarsh Grover, Xiaomin Lin, Agoritsa Polyzou

Organizations: Florida International University, Miami, USA · University of South Florida, Tampa, USA

Abstract

Large language models (LLMs) are trained on massive web-scale corpora, raising growing concerns about privacy and copyright. Membership inference attacks (MIAs) aim to determine whether a given example was used during training. Existing LLM MIAs largely rely on output probabilities or loss values and often perform only marginally better than random guessing when members and non-members are drawn from the same distribution. We introduce G-Drift MIA, a white-box membership inference method based on gradient-induced feature drift. Given a candidate (x,y), we apply a single targeted gradient-ascent step that increases its loss and measure the resulting changes in internal representations, including logits, hidden-layer activations, and projections onto fixed feature directions, before and after the update. These drift signals are used to train a lightweight logistic classifier that effectively separates members from non-members. Across multiple transformer-based LLMs and datasets derived from realistic MIA benchmarks, G-Drift substantially outperforms confidence-based, perplexity-based, and reference-based attacks. We further show that memorized training samples systematically exhibit smaller and more structured feature drift than non-members, providing a mechanistic link between gradient geometry, representation stability, and memorization. In general, our results demonstrate that small, controlled gradient interventions offer a practical tool for auditing the membership of training-data and assessing privacy risks in LLMs.

Figures & tables

Appendix figures & tables1 asset

Supplementary material from the paper’s appendix.

Appendix

Explore similar work

CardsList
  1. CheckMIABench: Firm Foundations For Membership Inference Attacks on Language Models

    Jun 16, 2026Jeffrey G. Wang, Jason Wang, Marvin Li +1LLM EvaluationMembership Inference Attacks

  2. Detecting Data Contamination in Large Language Models

    Apr 21, 2026Juliusz Janicki, Savvas Chamezopoulos, Evangelos Kanoulas +1Membership Inference AttacksLLM Auditing

  3. Black-Box Membership Inference via Word-Level Probability Estimation

    Sep 8, 2026Shengjie Niu, Yeheng Ge, Jian HuangMembership Inference AttacksPrivacy Leakage in Language Models